World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7827 7300 4206 3822 87 8170

Coren L. Apicella publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Coren L. Apicella between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Coren L. Apicella published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2023. 9 of the 108 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2023. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 6 publications
2004 2025

108 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Coren L. Apicella: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 4
2008 4
2009 2
2010 4
2011 5
2012 3
2013 0
2014 4
2015 6
2016 9
2017 11
2018 7
2019 6
2020 6
2021 6
2022 8
2023 12
2024 3
2025 6
Total 108
Download as CSV

Coren L. Apicella publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Coren L. Apicella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 87
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Coren L. Apicella D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Coren L. Apicella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Coren L. Apicella is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research output spans multiple publications primarily in psychology and social sciences, with a focus on evolutionary and social aspects of human behavior. The scientist's work is situated at the intersection of several specialized subfields, including sociology and political science, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and safety research.

The research topics covered by Coren L. Apicella concentrate on the following areas:

  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Frequent collaboration partners in their work include Kristopher M. Smith, Ara Norenzayan, Joseph Henrich, Duncan N. E. Stibbard-Hawkes, and Benjamin Grant Purzycki. These colleagues have coauthored multiple publications with Apicella, indicating ongoing research partnerships across related fields.

Coren L. Apicella regularly publishes in key academic venues, with a concentration in:

  • Evolution and Human Behavior (7 publications)
  • Religion Brain & Behavior (5 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (4 publications)
  • Scientific Reports (1 publication)
  • Nature Communications (1 publication)

Recent notable papers by this researcher include:

  • "Beyond WEIRD: A review of the last decade and a look ahead to the global laboratory of the future" (2020, Evolution and Human Behavior)
  • "Partner choice in human evolution: The role of cooperation, foraging ability, and culture in Hadza campmate preferences" (2020, Evolution and Human Behavior)
  • "The moralization bias of gods' minds: a cross-cultural test" (2022, Religion Brain & Behavior)
  • "Why hunt? Why gather? Why share? Hadza assessments of foraging and food-sharing motive" (2022, Evolution and Human Behavior)
  • "The religiosity gender gap in 14 diverse societies" (2022, Religion Brain & Behavior)

Best Publications

  • Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers

    Coren L. Apicella;Frank W. Marlowe;James H. Fowler;Nicholas A. Christakis

  • Testosterone and financial risk preferences

    Coren L. Apicella;Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber;Benjamin Campbell;Peter B. Gray

  • Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality

    Benjamin Grant Purzycki;Coren Apicella;Quentin D. Atkinson;Quentin D. Atkinson;Emma Cohen

  • Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers

    C.L Apicella;D.R Feinberg;F.W Marlowe

  • Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies

    David A. Puts;Coren L. Apicella;Rodrigo A. Cárdenas

  • The 7R polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4) is associated with financial risk taking in men

    Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber;Coren L. Apicella;Dan T.A. Eisenberg;Justin R. Garcia

  • Symmetry Is Related to Sexual Dimorphism in Faces: Data Across Culture and Species

    Anthony Charles Little;Benedict Christopher Jones;C. Waitt;Bernard Paul Tiddeman

  • Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers

    Anthony C Little;Coren L Apicella;Frank W Marlowe

  • Men's preferences for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies

    Frank Marlowe;Coren Apicella;Dorian Reed

  • Perceived mate fidelity and paternal resemblance predict men's investment in children

    Coren L. Apicella;Frank W. Marlowe

  • Evolutionary Origins of the Endowment Effect: Evidence from Hunter-Gatherers †

    Coren L. Apicella;Eduardo M. Azevedo;Nicholas A. Christakis;James H. Fowler

  • Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies.

    Martin Lang;Martin Lang;Benjamin Grant Purzycki;Coren L. Apicella;Quentin Douglas Atkinson

  • Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter–gatherers

    Coren L Apicella;David R Feinberg

  • Upper-body strength predicts hunting reputation and reproductive success in Hadza hunter–gatherers

    Coren Lee Apicella

  • Sexual selection on male vocal fundamental frequency in humans and other anthropoids.

    David A. Puts;Alexander K. Hill;Drew H. Bailey;Robert S. Walker

  • Detecting affiliation in colaughter across 24 societies

    Gregory A. Bryant;Daniel M. T. Fessler;Riccardo Fusaroli;Edward Clint

  • Testosterone exposure, dopaminergic reward, and sensation-seeking in young men.

    Benjamin C. Campbell;Anna Dreber;Coren L. Apicella;Dan T.A. Eisenberg

  • Testosterone and Economic Risk Taking: A Review

    Coren L. Apicella;Justin M. Carré;Anna Dreber

  • The evolution of human cooperation.

    Coren L. Apicella;Joan B. Silk

  • Salivary testosterone change following monetary wins and losses predicts future financial risk-taking

    Coren L. Apicella;Anna Dreber;Johanna Mollerstrom

  • No Gender Difference in Willingness to Compete When Competing against Self

    Coren L. Apicella;Elif E. Demiral;Johanna Mollerstrom

  • Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers.

    Coren L Apicella;Anthony C Little;Frank W Marlowe

Frequent Co-Authors

Anna Dreber
Anna Dreber Stockholm School of Economics
Anthony C. Little
Anthony C. Little University of Bath
Quentin D. Atkinson
Quentin D. Atkinson University of Auckland
Frank W. Marlowe
Frank W. Marlowe University of Cambridge
Benjamin Grant Purzycki
Benjamin Grant Purzycki Aarhus University
Ara Norenzayan
Ara Norenzayan University of British Columbia
David A. Puts
David A. Puts Pennsylvania State University
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Justin R. Garcia
Justin R. Garcia Indiana University
Daniel Eisenberg
Daniel Eisenberg University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens doors to various online programs and rewarding career pathways. One popular route is becoming a school counselor, which requires additional training and certification beyond a general psychology degree. Online master's programs in counseling or related fields can provide the necessary educational foundation for this career.

Certification requirements for school counselors vary by state, so it’s important to research your local guidelines. For example, to learn about Iowa school counselor certification requirements, potential candidates must review state-specific coursework and field experience mandates. Those interested in opportunities in Kansas should be aware of the Kansas school counselor certification requirements, which include completing an accredited graduate program.

In Kentucky, understanding how to become a school counselor in Kentucky is key for those aiming to serve in the state’s schools. Similarly, individuals should familiarize themselves with the requirements to be a school counselor in Louisiana if they plan to work there. Each pathway offers unique opportunities for those passionate about mental health and education.

Best Scientists Citing Coren L. Apicella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles