World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
24456
World Ranking
4694
National Ranking
502

Richard D. Morey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Morey sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard D. Morey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Morey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard D. Morey is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with notable contributions to the subfields of Social Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, and General Health Professions.

The main topics covered in Morey's work include:

  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Community Health and Development
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Morey has published in various venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Computational Brain & Behavior
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Human Reproduction

Representative recent papers include:

  • "Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy," 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE)," 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Discussion points for Bayesian inference," 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Beyond Statistical Ritual: Theory in Psychological Science," 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Principles of Model Specification in ANOVA Designs," 2022, Computational Brain & Behavior

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Morey are:

  • Joachim Vandekerckhove
  • Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
  • Jeffrey N. Rouder
  • Wolf Vanpaemel
  • Rink Hoekstra

Best Publications

  • Bayesian T Tests for Accepting and Rejecting the Null Hypothesis

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Paul L. Speckman;Dongchu Sun;Richard D. Morey

  • Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005)

    Richard D. Morey

  • Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Richard D. Morey;Paul L. Speckman;Jordan M. Province

  • Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Jonathon Love;Maarten Marsman;Tahira Jamil

  • Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications.

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Maarten Marsman;Tahira Jamil;Alexander Ly

  • Baysefactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs

    R. D. Morey;J. N. Rouder

  • JASP: Graphical Statistical Software for Common Statistical Designs

    Jonathon Love;Ravi Selker;Maarten Marsman;Tahira Jamil

  • Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results

    R. Silberzahn;E. L. Uhlmann;D. P. Martin;P. Anselmi

  • The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals

    Richard D. Morey;Rink Hoekstra;Jeffrey N. Rouder;Michael D. Lee

  • Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses

    Richard D. Morey;Jeffrey N. Rouder

  • Default Bayes Factors for Model Selection in Regression.

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Richard D. Morey

  • Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals

    Rink Hoekstra;Richard D. Morey;Jeffrey N. Rouder;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

  • An assessment, of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Richard D. Morey;Nelson Cowan;Christopher E. Zwilling

  • How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Richard D. Morey;Candice C. Morey;Nelson Cowan

  • Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results

    R Silberzahn;E L Uhlmann;D P Martin

  • Bayesian analysis of factorial designs.

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Richard D. Morey;Josine Verhagen;April R. Swagman

  • Bayesian Benefits for the Pragmatic Researcher

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Richard D. Morey;Michael D. Lee

  • The philosophy of Bayes’ factors and the quantification of statistical evidence

    Richard D. Morey;Richard D. Morey;Jan-Willem Romeijn;Jeffrey N. Rouder

  • A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem’s ESP claim

    Jeffrey N. Rouder;Richard D. Morey

  • The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review

    Richard D. Morey;Christopher D. Chambers;Peter J. Etchells;Christine R. Harris

  • The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals

    Richard Morey;E.J. Wagenmakers;J.N. Rouder;M.D. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey N. Rouder
Jeffrey N. Rouder University of California, Irvine
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Paul L. Speckman
Paul L. Speckman University of Missouri
Alexander Ly
Alexander Ly Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Andrew Heathcote
Andrew Heathcote University of Newcastle Australia
Rolf A. Zwaan
Rolf A. Zwaan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Annelieke M. Roest
Annelieke M. Roest University of Groningen
Andrew Gelman
Andrew Gelman Columbia University
Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
Peter de Jonge
Peter de Jonge University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As Psychology continues to grow as a field, students have more options than ever for online degree programs tailored to their interests and career goals. Many universities across the USA offer accessible online psychology degrees designed for aspiring professionals, career changers, and those seeking advanced study. Each region often showcases unique program strengths and areas of specialization.

For example, those seeking flexible learning can explore the most popular psychology degree programs in Delaware, which highlight programs known for both rigorous academics and student support. The most popular psychology degree programs in Fort Worth emphasize community-oriented approaches, offering pathways for counseling and social services careers.

In the Midwest, popular psychology degrees in Kent provide specializations that support diverse career outcomes in mental health, research, and education. Meanwhile, the most popular psychology degree programs in Las Vegas give students access to programs geared toward multicultural populations and unique professional settings.

Exploring accredited online options helps students align their degree choice with evolving industry needs and local workforce opportunities—setting the stage for meaningful, rewarding careers in psychology or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Richard D. Morey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles