World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 38 5832 5414 418 402 166 8969

Allyson Holbrook publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Allyson Holbrook between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Allyson Holbrook published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2006. 3 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2006. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 6 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1989 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Allyson Holbrook: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 2
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 6
2001 2
2002 7
2003 3
2004 10
2005 8
2006 11
2007 6
2008 6
2009 7
2010 5
2011 2
2012 6
2013 7
2014 9
2015 11
2016 8
2017 6
2018 6
2019 11
2020 9
2021 3
2022 2
2023 2
2024 1
2025 2
Total 172
Download as CSV

Allyson Holbrook publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allyson Holbrook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 166 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 166
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Allyson Holbrook D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allyson Holbrook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278 38
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Allyson Holbrook is affiliated with the University of Newcastle Australia. Their research spans several intersecting fields, primarily focused on Health Professions, Psychology, and Social Sciences. Within these areas, key subfields include General Health Professions, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Clinical Psychology.

The core themes in Holbrook's work center around doctoral education challenges and solutions, student assessment and feedback, healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, and studies related to perfectionism, procrastination, and anxiety. Additional research interests include innovations in medical education, career development and diversity, and science education and pedagogy.

Holbrook has contributed to a range of academic publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • Wellbeing and doctoral candidature: The background and development of the importance to doctoral wellbeing questionnaire (2022) published in Innovations in Education and Teaching International
  • Oral defence as a feedback mechanism in doctoral development and examination (2021) published in The Australian Educational Researcher
  • Supervisor perspectives on the 'end-stage' of the doctoral examination process (2020) published in Higher Education Research & Development
  • Why we should capitalise on early childhood interest in engineering: changes in students' interest over the school years (2021) published in Australasian journal of engineering education
  • Dispositions towards learning: the importance of epistemic attributes for postgraduate learners (2023) published in Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Holbrook include:

  • Hedy Fairbairn
  • Jill Scevak
  • Kylie Shaw
  • Terence Lovat
  • Kerry Dally

Holbrook's research has appeared repeatedly in several publication venues, notably Higher Education Research & Development, Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, and The Australian Educational Researcher.

Best Publications

  • Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias

    Allyson L. Holbrook;Melanie C. Green;J. O. N. A. Krosnick

  • The Impact of "No Opinion" Response Options on Data Quality: Non-Attitude Reduction or an Invitation to Satisfice?

    Jon A. Krosnick;Allyson L. Holbrook;Matthew K. Berent;Richard T. Carson

  • Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports Tests using the item count technique

    Allyson L. Holbrook;Jon A. Krosnick

  • The Origins and Consequences of democratic citizens' Policy Agendas: A Study of Popular Concern about Global Warming

    Jon A. Krosnick;Allyson L. Holbrook;Laura Lowe;Penny S. Visser

  • The Causes and Consequences of Response Rates in Surveys by the News Media and Government Contractor Survey Research Firms

    Allyson L. Holbrook;Jon A. Krosnick;Alison Pfent

  • Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory.

    Allyson L. Holbrook;Matthew K. Berent;Jon A. Krosnick;Penny S. Visser

  • The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion

    Jon A. Krosnick;Allyson L. Holbrook;Penny S. Visser

  • Attitudes toward presidential candidates and political parties: Initial optimism, inertial first impressions, and a focus on flaws

    Allyson L. Holbrook;Jon A. Krosnick;Penny S. Visser;Wendi L. Gardner

  • Response Order Effects in Dichotomous Categorical Questions Presented Orally The Impact of Question and Respondent Attributes

    Allyson L. Holbrook;Jon A. Krosnick;David Moore;Roger Tourangeau

  • The Impact of Personality on Cognitive, Behavioral, and Affective Political Processes: The Effects of Need to Evaluate

    George Y. Bizer;Jon A. Krosnick;Allyson L. Holbrook;S. Christian Wheeler

  • Measuring Voter Turnout By Using The Randomized Response Technique Evidence Calling Into Question The Method’s Validity

    Allyson L. Holbrook;Jon A. Krosnick

  • The Impact of Question and Respondent Characteristics on Comprehension and Mapping Difficulties

    Allyson Holbrook;Young Ik Cho;Timothy Johnson

  • Attrition, completion and completion times of PhD candidates

    Sid Bourke;Allyson Holbrook;Terence Lovat;Peter Farley

  • Culture Moderates the Relation Between Perceived Stress, Social Support, and Mental and Physical Health:

    Sharon Shavitt;Young Ik Cho;Timothy P. Johnson;Duo Jiang

  • Doctoral supervision in a cross-cultural context: issues affecting supervisors and candidates

    Theresa Winchester-Seeto;Judi Homewood;Jane Thogersen;Christa Jacenyik-Trawoger

  • Survey response styles across cultures

    Timothy P. Johnson;Sharon Shavitt;Allyson L. Holbrook

  • Investigating PhD thesis examination reports

    Allyson Holbrook;Sidney Bourke;Terence Lovat;Kerry Dally

  • Examiner comment on the literature review in Ph.D. theses

    Allyson Holbrook;Sid Bourke;Hedy Fairbairn;Terry Lovat

  • Using Community-Level Correlates to Evaluate Nonresponse Effects in a Telephone Survey

    Timothy P. Johnson;Young Ik Cho;Richard T. Campbell;Allyson L. Holbrook

  • Valuing the protection of ecological systems and services; a report of the EPA Science Advisory Board

    Barton H. Thompson;Robert E. Paradise;Perry L. McCarty;Kathleen Segerson

  • Knowledge and Attitudes

    Penny S. Visser;Allyson Holbrook;Jon A. Krosnick

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy P. Johnson
Timothy P. Johnson University of Illinois at Chicago
Jon A. Krosnick
Jon A. Krosnick Stanford University
Sharon Shavitt
Sharon Shavitt University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Vaughan J. Carr
Vaughan J. Carr University of New South Wales
Brian Paltridge
Brian Paltridge University of Sydney
Kristin R. Laurens
Kristin R. Laurens Queensland University of Technology
Melissa J. Green
Melissa J. Green University of New South Wales
Sally Brinkman
Sally Brinkman University of Adelaide
Roger Tourangeau
Roger Tourangeau Westat (United States)
Rhoshel K. Lenroot
Rhoshel K. Lenroot University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to diverse career paths, many of which now offer flexible online study options. For those interested in clinical and social support roles, there are affordable and cheap msw programs online that help students balance quality education with low tuition.

If behavior analysis is your focus, you can pursue bcba accredited programs online to become board certified in this growing field. Those looking to complete their degree in a shorter timeframe can choose from masters in social work accelerated programs, which are designed to fast-track your progression into the workforce.

A background in psychology offers even greater flexibility; students can look for accelerated psychology programs online to quickly gain skills in research, counseling, or clinical work. With these online pathways, you can match your learning style, professional goals, and budget while advancing in rewarding humanities and social sciences careers.

Best Scientists Citing Allyson Holbrook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles