World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
27666
World Ranking
6785
National Ranking
3675

Roxana Moreno publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roxana Moreno sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 72 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Roxana Moreno D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roxana Moreno sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roxana Moreno was affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States during their academic career. Their professional work covered research activities connected to this institution.

There is no available information regarding specific publications authored by Roxana Moreno, including formal papers or book contributions. Consequently, no details about frequent co-authors or specific publication venues have been recorded.

Similarly, no data is present about their main fields of study, subfields, or particular research topics they addressed in their scientific work.

Details about awards or recognitions received by Roxana Moreno are also not documented.

Overall, the public academic record for Roxana Moreno does not include detailed documentation of research outputs or collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning

    Richard E. Mayer;Roxana Moreno

  • Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity

    Roxana Moreno;Richard E. Mayer

  • A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory

    Richard E. Mayer;Roxana Moreno

  • Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments Special Issue on Interactive Learning Environments: Contemporary Issues and Trends

    Roxana Moreno;Richard Mayer

  • Animation as an Aid to Multimedia Learning

    Richard E. Mayer;Roxana Moreno

  • The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents?

    Roxana Moreno;Richard E. Mayer;Hiller A. Spires;James C. Lester

  • Aids to computer-based multimedia learning.

    Richard E. Mayer;Roxana Moreno

  • Cognitive load theory

    Jan L. Plass;Roxana Moreno;Roland Brünken

  • A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages.

    Roxana Moreno;Richard E. Mayer

  • Decreasing Cognitive Load for Novice Students: Effects of Explanatory versus Corrective Feedback in Discovery-Based Multimedia.

    Roxana Moreno

  • Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening

    Roxana Moreno;Richard E. Mayer

  • Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages.

    Roxana Moreno;Richard E. Mayer

  • Learning Science in Virtual Reality Multimedia Environments: Role of Methods and Media

    Roxana Moreno;Richard E. Mayer

  • Maximizing Constructivist Learning From Multimedia Communications by Minimizing Cognitive Load

    Richard E. Mayer;Roxana Moreno;Michelle Boire;Shannon Vagge

  • Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game

    Roxana Moreno;Richard E. Mayer

  • Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments

    Roxana Moreno;Richard E. Mayer

  • A Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning: Implications for Design Principles

    Richard E Mayer;Roxana Moreno

  • Cognitive Load and Learning Effects of Having Students Organize Pictures and Words in Multimedia Environments: The Role of Student Interactivity and Feedback

    Roxana Moreno;Alfred Valdez

  • Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: cognitive and affective consequences of signalling and segmentation methods

    Roxana Moreno

  • Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method‐affects‐learning hypothesis

    Unknown

  • Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study

    Babette Park;Roxana Moreno;Tina Seufert;Roland Brünken

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard E. Mayer
Richard E. Mayer University of California, Santa Barbara
Martin Reisslein
Martin Reisslein Arizona State University
Jan L. Plass
Jan L. Plass New York University
James C. Lester
James C. Lester North Carolina State University
Mary Hegarty
Mary Hegarty University of California, Santa Barbara
Stephen M. Fiore
Stephen M. Fiore University of Central Florida
Wolfgang Schnotz
Wolfgang Schnotz University of Koblenz and Landau

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open numerous doors to rewarding career pathways in mental health. Many students in the USA choose to specialize in counseling, which often requires licensure and region-specific education. Fortunately, several states offer streamlined and accelerated programs for those interested in entering the field quickly.

If you are considering becoming a counselor, researching the quickest path to becoming a counselor in New Hampshire or the quickest path to becoming a counselor in New Jersey can help you select the ideal program and understand local licensure requirements.

Those seeking intensive study might benefit from New Mexico accelerated counseling programs, which are designed for faster completion times. Similarly, understanding the quickest path to becoming a counselor in New York can streamline your professional journey.

By comparing these pathways and online degree options, students can make informed choices based on their goals, state requirements, and desired career timelines.

Best Scientists Citing Roxana Moreno

Recently Published Articles