World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 34 6867 6376 3336 3041 74 7198

Amy L. Baylor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy L. Baylor between 1997 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy L. Baylor published across 26 years, from 1997 to 2022, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2003. 1 of the 75 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2003. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1997 2022

75 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy L. Baylor: publications per year, 1997 to 2022
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 9
2002 3
2003 13
2004 4
2005 12
2006 6
2007 8
2008 3
2009 3
2010 2
2011 1
2012 1
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 75
Download as CSV

Amy L. Baylor publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy L. Baylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 74 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 74
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Amy L. Baylor D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy L. Baylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181 34
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Amy L. Baylor is affiliated with the National Science Foundation in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Psychology, with particular emphasis on Computer Science Applications and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their work focuses on topics including Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Online Learning and Analytics, and Teaching and Learning Programming. These areas reflect a concentration on educational strategies and technological integration in learning environments.

Baylor has contributed scholarly articles to journals such as Educational Technology Research and Development. A notable recent publication is titled Explicit instruction in the context of whole-tasks: the effectiveness of the task-centered instructional strategy in computer science education, published in 2022 in Educational Technology Research and Development.

  • Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima
  • Margaret Merrill
  • Tristan E. Johnson

Their collaborative network includes frequent coauthors Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima, Margaret Merrill, and Tristan E. Johnson.

  • Educational Technology Research and Development

This venue is a primary outlet for their published research.

Best Publications

  • What Factors Facilitate Teacher Skill, Teacher Morale, and Perceived Student Learning in Technology-Using Classrooms?

    Amy L Baylor;Donn Ritchie

  • Simulating Instructional Roles through Pedagogical Agents

    Amy L. Baylor;Yanghee Kim

  • A Social-Cognitive Framework for Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions

    Yanghee Kim;Amy L. Baylor

  • Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: role of visual presence and appearance

    Amy L. Baylor

  • Pedagogical agent design: The impact of agent realism, gender, ethnicity, and instructional role

    Amy L. Baylor;Yanghee Kim

  • The Effects of Image and Animation in Enhancing Pedagogical Agent Persona

    Amy L. Baylor;Jeeheon Ryu

  • Pedagogical agents as learning companions: the impact of agent emotion and gender

    Yanghee Kim;Amy L. Baylor;E. Shen

  • The design of motivational agents and avatars

    Amy L. Baylor

  • Expanding preservice teachers' metacognitive awareness of instructional planning through pedagogical agents

    Amy L. Baylor

  • Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents: When less is more

    Amy L. Baylor;Soyoung Kim

  • Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions: The Role of Agent Competency and Type of Interaction

    Yanghee Kim;Amy L. Baylor

  • A U-shaped model for the development of intuition by level of expertise

    Amy L Baylor

  • Changing middle-school students' attitudes and performance regarding engineering with computer-based social models

    E. Ashby Plant;Amy L. Baylor;Celeste E. Doerr;Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima

  • Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students' attitudes and beliefs

    Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima;Amy L. Baylor;E. Ashby Plant;Celeste E. Doerr

  • Intelligent Agents as Cognitive Tools for Education.

    Amy Baylor

  • Beyond Butlers: Intelligent Agents as Mentors:

    Amy Baylor

  • THE PSYCHOMETRIC STRUCTURE OF PEDAGOGICAL AGENT PERSONA

    Jeeheon Ryu;Amy L. Baylor

  • A Virtual Change Agent: Motivating Pre-service Teachers to Integrate Technology in Their Future Classrooms

    Chan Min Kim;Amy L. Baylor

  • The Role of Gender and Ethnicity in Pedagogical Agent Perception

    Amy Baylor;Yanghee Kim

  • Agent-Based Learning Environments as a Research Tool for Investigating Teaching and Learning:

    Amy L. Baylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Anastasia Kitsantas
Anastasia Kitsantas George Mason University
E. Ashby Plant
E. Ashby Plant Florida State University
Richard Lesh
Richard Lesh Indiana University
Manu Kapur
Manu Kapur ETH Zurich
Arthur C. Graesser
Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis
W. Lewis Johnson
W. Lewis Johnson University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Social Sciences and Humanities has never been more accessible, thanks to a range of flexible online options. From psychology to education and liberal arts, students can now explore accelerated programs tailored to their academic and professional goals. One important consideration is cost; understanding how much does a masters in psychology cost can help you budget effectively for your future.

If your aim is to fast-track your studies, options such as accelerated edd programs online allow you to earn advanced education credentials swiftly. For those looking for a quicker master’s route, the online master's programs that can be completed within a year provide both flexibility and efficiency.

At the undergraduate level, exploring an accelerated bachelor's degree can help you get started in your chosen field sooner. These diverse pathways open doors to a variety of career opportunities in education, public service, research, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Amy L. Baylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles