World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
111
Citations
54569
World Ranking
5273
National Ranking
2847

Gordon H. Williams publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon H. Williams sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 639 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gordon H. Williams D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon H. Williams sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gordon H. Williams is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with a specialization in endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism. They have contributed to subfields including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, molecular biology, nutrition and dietetics, and surgery.

The scientist's main topics of study involve hormonal regulation and hypertension, blood pressure and hypertension studies, sodium intake and health, and renin-angiotensin system studies. Further areas of interest include cardiovascular, neuropeptides, and oxidative stress research, as well as apelin-related biomedical research and birth, development, and health.

Gordon H. Williams has published extensively, with frequent contributions to journals such as Hypertension, the Journal of the Endocrine Society, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Annals of Internal Medicine, and the Journal of Endocrinology.

  • Frequent co-authors include Gail K. Adler, Luminita H. Pojoga, Jonathan S. Williams, Mahyar Heydarpour, and José R. Romero.

Their recent papers illustrate a sustained interest in cardiovascular and endocrine disorders. Selected publications include:

  • The Unrecognized Prevalence of Primary Aldosteronism, 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Aldosterone and cardiovascular diseases, 2022, Cardiovascular Research
  • The Unrecognized Prevalence of Primary Aldosteronism, 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Dietary sodium intake and cortisol measurements, 2020, Clinical Endocrinology
  • Lysine-Specific Demethylase-1 Deficiency Increases Agonist Signaling Via the Mineralocorticoid Receptor, 2020, Hypertension

Best Publications

  • New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk

    Josée Dupuis;Josée Dupuis;Claudia Langenberg;Inga Prokopenko;Richa Saxena;Richa Saxena

  • New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk (vol 42, pg 105, 2010)

    J Dupuis;C Langenberg;I Prokopenko;R Saxena

  • The Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy on the Quality of Life

    Croog Sh;Levine S;Testa Ma;Brown B

  • A genome-wide association search for type 2 diabetes genes in African Americans.

    N D Palmer;C W McDonough;P J Hicks;B H Roh

  • Concurrent morning increase in platelet aggregability and the risk of myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death.

    Geoffrey H. Tofler;Damian Brezinski;Andrew I. Schafer;Charles A. Czeisler

  • Genome-wide association of early-onset myocardial infarction with single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variants.

    Sekar Kathiresan;Benjamin F Voight;Shaun Purcell;Kiran Musunuru

  • Effects of eplerenone, enalapril, and eplerenone/enalapril in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: the 4E-left ventricular hypertrophy study.

    Bertram Pitt;Nathaniel Reichek;Roland Willenbrock;Faiez Zannad

  • Principal results of the Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular End Points (CONVINCE) trial.

    Henry R. Black;William J. Elliott;Gregory Grandits;Patricia Grambsch

  • Effect of captopril on progression to clinical proteinuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria

    G Viberti;C E Mogensen;L C Groop;J F Pauls

  • Genetic variation in GIPR influences the glucose and insulin responses to an oral glucose challenge

    Richa Saxena;Richa Saxena;Claudia Langenberg;Toshiko Tanaka;Toshiko Tanaka

  • Relation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to clinical state in congestive heart failure.

    V J Dzau;W S Colucci;N K Hollenberg;G H Williams

  • HPA axis in major depression: cortisol, clinical symptomatology and genetic variation predict cognition

    Jennifer Keller;Rowena Gomez;Rowena Gomez;Gordon Williams;Anna Lembke

  • Aldosterone: A Mediator of Myocardial Necrosis and Renal Arteriopathy

    Ricardo Rocha;Charles T. Stier;Imre Kifor;Margarita R. Ochoa-Maya

  • Prostaglandins in severe congestive heart failure. Relation to activation of the renin--angiotensin system and hyponatremia.

    Victor J. Dzau;Milton Packer;Leonard S. Lilly;Stephen L. Swartz

  • Novel Loci for Adiponectin Levels and Their Influence on Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Traits: A Multi-Ethnic Meta-Analysis of 45,891 Individuals

    Z Dastani;Hivert M-F.;Hivert M-F.;N Timpson;Perry Jrb.;Perry Jrb.

  • Stimulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor in vivo by infusion of angiotensin II. Evidence of a potential interaction between the renin-angiotensin system and fibrinolytic function.

    Paul M. Ridker;Cynthia L. Gaboury;Paul R. Conlin;Ellen W. Seely

  • Selective Aldosterone Blockade with Eplerenone Reduces Albuminuria in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

    Murray Epstein;Gordon H. Williams;Myron Weinberger;Andrew Lewin

  • Sustained Effectiveness of Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Patients with Severe Congestive Heart Failure

    Victor J. Dzau;Wilson S. Colucci;Gordon H. Williams;Gregory Curfman

  • Erratum: New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk (Nature Genetics (2010) 42 (105-116))

    Josée Dupuis;Claudia Langenberg;Inga Prokopenko;Richa Saxena

  • Principal results of the controlled onset verapamil investigation of cardiovascular end points (CONVINCE) trial

    H.R. Black;W.J. Elliott;G. Granditis;P. Grambsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Norman K. Hollenberg
Norman K. Hollenberg Brigham and Women's Hospital
Gail K. Adler
Gail K. Adler Brigham and Women's Hospital
Paul N. Hopkins
Paul N. Hopkins University of Utah
Xavier Jeunemaitre
Xavier Jeunemaitre Université Paris Cité
Nancy J. Brown
Nancy J. Brown Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Steven C. Hunt
Steven C. Hunt Cornell University
Oluf Pedersen
Oluf Pedersen University of Copenhagen
Benjamin F. Voight
Benjamin F. Voight University of Pennsylvania
Jose C. Florez
Jose C. Florez Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative career pathways in medicine and healthcare can be a smart way to widen your impact. Many students are turning to flexible, affordable options online to either start or advance their healthcare careers.

For those interested in administration, consider looking into the cheapest mha programs. These can prepare you for leadership roles in healthcare systems with a focus on management and policy.

Aspiring to advanced clinical practice? Earning your degree through one of the cheapest dnp programs online makes it easier to balance work, life, and study while qualifying for top nursing positions.

If pharmacy interests you, online pharmacy school programs provide a flexible path to becoming a pharmacist, allowing you to study from anywhere.

Alternatively, explore roles in data and technology with an online bachelor's in health information management. This field focuses on the secure handling of patient information and is growing rapidly.

Best Scientists Citing Gordon H. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles