World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 63 2789 2554 1112 986 136 12058

Rodney K. Tweten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rodney K. Tweten between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rodney K. Tweten published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2015. 4 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2015. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 7 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1981 2025

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rodney K. Tweten: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 4
1984 1
1985 2
1986 0
1987 0
1988 4
1989 0
1990 0
1991 3
1992 2
1993 3
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 7
1998 5
1999 4
2000 3
2001 4
2002 3
2003 5
2004 7
2005 9
2006 6
2007 3
2008 3
2009 4
2010 2
2011 5
2012 7
2013 2
2014 6
2015 13
2016 1
2017 1
2018 1
2019 2
2020 4
2021 4
2022 2
2023 5
2024 3
2025 1
Total 146
Download as CSV

Rodney K. Tweten publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney K. Tweten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 135–144 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 136 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288 136
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Rodney K. Tweten D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney K. Tweten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144 63
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Rodney K. Tweten is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, and Ecology.

Their work covers several main topics, including Streptococcal Infections and Treatments, Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections, Bacteriophages and microbial interactions, Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus, Bacterial Infections and Vaccines, Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research, and Neonatal and Maternal Infections.

Rodney K. Tweten has contributed to a number of scientific papers. Some of the recent publications include:

  • A proteolytically activated antimicrobial toxin encoded on a mobile plasmid of Bacteroidales induces a protective response (2022, Nature Communications)
  • A Key Motif in the Cholesterol-Dependent Cytolysins Reveals a Large Family of Related Proteins (2020, mBio)
  • Cholesterol-dependent cytolysins: The outstanding questions (2022, IUBMB Life)
  • A listeriolysin O subunit vaccine is protective against Listeria monocytogenes (2020, Vaccine)
  • Pore-forming activity of S. pneumoniae pneumolysin disrupts the paracellular localization of the epithelial adherens junction protein E-cadherin (2023, Infection and Immunity)

Frequent coauthors in Rodney K. Tweten's research include Bronte A. Johnstone, Craig J. Morton, Michelle P. Christie, Michael W. Parker, and Jordan C. Evans.

The scientist's work has been published in various venues multiple times. Notable frequent publication venues are:

  • Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances (4 publications)
  • Nature Communications (2 publications)
  • Vaccine (2 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2 publications)
  • mBio (1 publication)

Best Publications

  • Cholesterol-Dependent Cytolysins, a Family of Versatile Pore-Forming Toxins

    Rodney K. Tweten

  • Structure of a cholesterol-binding, thiol-activated cytolysin and a model of its membrane form.

    Jamie Rossjohn;Susanne C Feil;William J McKinstry;Rodney K Tweten

  • Identification of a membrane-spanning domain of the thiol-activated pore-forming toxin Clostridium perfringens perfringolysin O: an alpha-helical to beta-sheet transition identified by fluorescence spectroscopy.

    Laura A. Shepard;Alejandro P. Heuck;Brian D. Hamman;Jamie Rossjohn

  • The mechanism of membrane insertion for a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin: a novel paradigm for pore-forming toxins.

    Oleg Shatursky;Alejandro P Heuck;Laura A Shepard;Jamie Rossjohn

  • Vertical collapse of a cytolysin prepore moves its transmembrane β‐hairpins to the membrane

    Daniel M Czajkowsky;Eileen M Hotze;Zhifeng Shao;Rodney K Tweten

  • Human CD59 is a receptor for the cholesterol-dependent cytolysin intermedilysin

    Kara S Giddings;Ji Zhao;Peter J Sims;Rodney K Tweten

  • Redefining cholesterol's role in the mechanism of the cholesterol-dependent cytolysins

    Kara S. Giddings;Arthur E. Johnson;Rodney K. Tweten

  • Structural insights into the membrane-anchoring mechanism of a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin.

    Rajesh Ramachandran;Alejandro P. Heuck;Rodney K. Tweten;Arthur E. Johnson

  • Molecular basis of listeriolysin O pH dependence

    Daniel W. Schuerch;Elizabeth M. Wilson-Kubalek;Rodney K. Tweten

  • Only two amino acids are essential for cytolytic toxin recognition of cholesterol at the membrane surface

    Allison J. Farrand;Stephanie LaChapelle;Eileen M. Hotze;Arthur E. Johnson

  • Membrane assembly of the cholesterol-dependent cytolysin pore complex.

    Eileen M. Hotze;Rodney K. Tweten

  • The Mechanism of Pore Assembly for a Cholesterol-Dependent Cytolysin: Formation of a Large Prepore Complex Precedes the Insertion of the Transmembrane β-Hairpins†

    Laura A. Shepard;Oleg Shatursky;and Arthur E. Johnson;Rodney K. Tweten

  • Insights into the action of the superfamily of cholesterol-dependent cytolysins from studies of intermedilysin

    Galina Polekhina;Kara Sue Giddings;Rodney K Tweten;Michael William Parker

  • Membrane-dependent conformational changes initiate cholesterol-dependent cytolysin oligomerization and intersubunit β-strand alignment

    Rajesh Ramachandran;Rodney K Tweten;Arthur E Johnson

  • Mechanism of Membrane Insertion of a Multimeric β-Barrel Protein: Perfringolysin O Creates a Pore Using Ordered and Coupled Conformational Changes

    Alejandro P Heuck;Eileen M Hotze;Rodney K Tweten;Arthur E Johnson

  • The Cholesterol-Dependent Cytolysins

    R. K. Tweten;M. W. Parker;A. E. Johnson

  • Clostridium septicum alpha toxin uses glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein receptors.

    Valery M. Gordon;Kim L. Nelson;J. Thomas Buckley;Victoria L. Stevens

  • Beta-barrel pore-forming toxins: intriguing dimorphic proteins.

    Alejandro P. Heuck;Rodney K. Tweten;Arthur E. Johnson

  • Arresting Pore Formation of a Cholesterol-dependent Cytolysin by Disulfide Trapping Synchronizes the Insertion of the Transmembrane β-Sheet from a Prepore Intermediate

    Eileen M. Hotze;Elizabeth M. Wilson-Kubalek;Jamie Rossjohn;Michael W. Parker

  • Structural elements of the cholesterol-dependent cytolysins that are responsible for their cholesterol-sensitive membrane interactions

    Casie E. Soltani;Eileen M. Hotze;Arthur E. Johnson;Rodney K. Tweten

  • Nucleotide sequence of the gene for perfringolysin O (theta-toxin) from Clostridium perfringens: significant homology with the genes for streptolysin O and pneumolysin.

    R K Tweten

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael W. Parker
Michael W. Parker University of Melbourne
Arthur E. Johnson
Arthur E. Johnson Texas A&M University
Jamie Rossjohn
Jamie Rossjohn Monash University
Dennis L. Stevens
Dennis L. Stevens University of Washington
Peter J. Sims
Peter J. Sims University of Rochester
Amy E. Bryant
Amy E. Bryant Idaho State University
James C. Paton
James C. Paton University of Adelaide
Elaine I. Tuomanen
Elaine I. Tuomanen St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Mark R. Alderson
Mark R. Alderson Program for Appropriate Technology in Health
Julian I. Rood
Julian I. Rood Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in microbiology, expanding your skill set through related online degrees can enhance career prospects. Many students explore programs such as online health information management programs cahiim accredited, which combine healthcare knowledge with data management skills. These programs are essential as accurate health data plays a crucial role in microbiological research and public health.

Additionally, short certification options like the fast online medical billing and coding certification programs offer a quick entry into the healthcare industry. While not directly related to microbiology, these programs provide an understanding of healthcare operations, which can complement scientific expertise.

For a more focused medical background, students should explore online medical programs that cover relevant medical sciences. These programs often support careers in clinical microbiology and infectious disease research, broadening professional opportunities.

Public health knowledge is also invaluable. Many look to fastest and easiest online mph programs, which allow quicker study of population health and epidemiology—fields closely connected to microbiology. Combining these pathways can lead to diverse and rewarding careers in healthcare and research.

Best Scientists Citing Rodney K. Tweten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles