World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
76
Citations
28351
World Ranking
4956
National Ranking
93

F. Gisou van der Goot publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Gisou van der Goot sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 184 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

F. Gisou van der Goot D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Gisou van der Goot sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

F. Gisou van der Goot is a researcher affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their work is situated within the academic environment of this institution, contributing to its scientific community.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues have been documented in the available data. Similarly, there is no detailed information on book publications or patterns of published work across particular outlets.

The data does not indicate particular main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics associated with van der Goot. Likewise, there is no record of awards or recognitions attributed to this scientist.

Despite the limited publicly available dataset, the association with a major technical university implies involvement in ongoing research activities typical for such an environment.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Targeting STING with covalent small-molecule inhibitors

    Simone M. Haag;Muhammet F. Gulen;Luc Reymond;Antoine Gibelin

  • Pore-forming toxins: ancient, but never really out of fashion

    Matteo Dal Peraro;F. Gisou van der Goot

  • Anthrax toxin triggers endocytosis of its receptor via a lipid raft–mediated clathrin-dependent process

    Laurence Abrami;Shihui Liu;Pierre Cosson;Stephen H. Leppla

  • Caspase-1 Activation of Lipid Metabolic Pathways in Response to Bacterial Pore-Forming Toxins Promotes Cell Survival

    Laure Gurcel;Laurence Abrami;Stephen Girardin;Jurg Tschopp

  • Mechanisms of pathogen entry through the endosomal compartments.

    Jean Gruenberg;F. Gisou van der Goot;F. Gisou van der Goot

  • Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways defend against bacterial pore-forming toxins.

    Danielle L. Huffman;Laurence Abrami;Roman Sasik;Jacques Corbeil

  • Shigella phagocytic vacuolar membrane remnants participate in the cellular response to pathogen invasion and are regulated by autophagy.

    Nicolas Dupont;Sandra Lacas-Gervais;Sandra Lacas-Gervais;Sandra Lacas-Gervais;Julie Bertout;Julie Bertout;Julie Bertout;Irit Paz

  • Initial steps of Shigella infection depend on the cholesterol/sphingolipid raft‐mediated CD44–IpaB interaction

    Frank Lafont;Guy Tran Van Nhieu;Kentaro Hanada;Philippe Sansonetti

  • What does S-palmitoylation do to membrane proteins?

    Sanja Blaskovic;Mathieu Blanc;F. Gisou van der Goot

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Membrane insertion of anthrax protective antigen and cytoplasmic delivery of lethal factor occur at different stages of the endocytic pathway

    Laurence Abrami;Margaret Lindsay;Robert G. Parton;Stephen H. Leppla

  • Differential sorting and fate of endocytosed GPI-anchored proteins.

    Marc Fivaz;Francis Vilbois;Sarah Thurnheer;Christian Pasquali

  • Receptor palmitoylation and ubiquitination regulate anthrax toxin endocytosis

    Laurence Abrami;Stephen H. Leppla;F. Gisou van der Goot

  • A pore-forming toxin interacts with a GPI-anchored protein and causes vacuolation of the endoplasmic reticulum

    Laurence Abrami;Marc Fivaz;Pierre-Etienne Glauser;Robert G. Parton

  • Intra-endosomal membrane traffic

    F. Gisou van der Goot;Jean Gruenberg

  • Pathogenic pore-forming proteins: function and host response.

    Mirko Bischofberger;Ioan Iacovache;F. Gisou van der Goot

  • Pore formation: an ancient yet complex form of attack.

    Ioan Iacovache;F. Gisou van der Goot;Lucile Pernot

  • Regulation of the V-ATPase along the endocytic pathway occurs through reversible subunit association and membrane localization.

    Céline Lafourcade;Komla Sobo;Sylvie Kieffer-Jaquinod;Jérome Garin

Frequent Co-Authors

Matteo Dal Peraro
Matteo Dal Peraro École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Jean Gruenberg
Jean Gruenberg University of Geneva
Robert G. Parton
Robert G. Parton University of Queensland
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Jean-Laurent Casanova
Jean-Laurent Casanova The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Vassily Hatzimanikatis
Vassily Hatzimanikatis École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Franc Pattus
Franc Pattus École Normale Supérieure
Vladimir N. Uversky
Vladimir N. Uversky University of South Florida
Shazib Pervaiz
Shazib Pervaiz National University of Singapore
Stephen H. Leppla
Stephen H. Leppla National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a wide range of healthcare and science-focused careers. If you’re interested in expanding your education or advancing your career from home, online programs offer convenient pathways in specialized fields.

For those drawn to mental health, psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs online prepare graduates to deliver expert care and fill growing workforce needs. Nutrition remains another high-demand area—fast track options, like a fast track nutrition degree, let you qualify quickly for careers in wellness, dietetics, or public health.

Many roles in healthcare leadership now require an MBA. Consider the flexibility of online healthcare MBA programs if you’re aiming for management or administrative positions. Alternatively, if you appreciate detail-oriented work, pursuing credentials like certified coding specialist can lead to vital roles in medical billing and coding—with entry to a rapidly evolving industry.

Exploring these online degrees and certifications can be an ideal way to build your expertise and adapt your Biology or Biochemistry background for today’s dynamic healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing F. Gisou van der Goot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles