World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9952 9318 8 8 127 4284

Giyeon Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Giyeon Kim between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Giyeon Kim published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2019. 13 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2019. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 3 publications
2005 2025

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Giyeon Kim: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 2
2007 5
2008 2
2009 3
2010 8
2011 8
2012 13
2013 6
2014 10
2015 3
2016 9
2017 9
2018 14
2019 16
2020 13
2021 11
2022 6
2023 13
2024 10
2025 3
Total 166
Download as CSV

Giyeon Kim publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giyeon Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 127
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Giyeon Kim D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giyeon Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Giyeon Kim is affiliated with Chung-Ang University in South Korea and specializes in research primarily within the field of Social Sciences. Their scholarly output focuses on several subfields including General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Clinical Psychology, and Demography.

Their research addresses multiple core topics such as Health disparities and outcomes, Health and Wellbeing Research, Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving, Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health, Health and Well-being Studies, Technology Use by Older Adults, and Noise Effects and Management.

Giyeon Kim's recent papers include the following:

  • Digital technology use and depressive symptoms among older adults in Korea: beneficial for those who have fewer social interactions? (2020), Aging & Mental Health
  • The Role of Polygenic Score and Cognitive Activity in Cognitive Functioning Among Older Adults (2020), The Gerontologist
  • Multi-group frailty trajectories among older Koreans: Results from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (2021), Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
  • Mental Health of Asian American Older Adults: Contemporary Issues and Future Directions (2020), Innovation in Aging
  • Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Longitudinal Effects of Fear of Falling on Falls (2021), Gerontology

Some venues where Giyeon Kim frequently publishes their work include:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Aging & Mental Health
  • Korea Gerontological Society
  • Korean Journal of Research in Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and gerontology international/Geriatrics & gerontology international

The scientist has collaborated most often with:

  • Yeonsoo Shin
  • Juhyeong Lee
  • Suha You
  • Soohyun Park
  • Darren Liu

Best Publications

  • Limited English proficiency as a barrier to mental health service use: a study of Latino and Asian immigrants with psychiatric disorders.

    Giyeon Kim;Claudia X. Aguado Loi;David A. Chiriboga;Yuri Jang

  • Vulnerability of Older Latino and Asian Immigrants with Limited English Proficiency

    Giyeon Kim;Courtney B. Worley;Rebecca S. Allen;Latrice Vinson

  • Acculturation and manifestation of depressive symptoms among Korean-American older adults.

    Yuri Jang;G. Kim;D. Chiriboga

  • Race/ethnicity and measurement equivalence of the Everyday Discrimination Scale.

    Giyeon Kim;Martin Sellbom;Katy-Lauren Ford

  • A Bidimensional Model of Acculturation for Korean American Older Adults.

    Yuri Jang;Giyeon Kim;David Chiriboga;Bellinda Kallimanis

  • Race/ethnicity and the factor structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: a meta-analysis.

    Giyeon Kim;Jamie DeCoster;Chao-Hui Huang;David A. Chiriboga

  • Attitudes of Older Korean Americans Toward Mental Health Services

    Yuri Jang;Giyeon Kim;Lianne Hansen;David A. Chiriboga

  • Health, healthcare utilization, and satisfaction with service: barriers and facilitators for older Korean Americans.

    Yuri Jang;Giyeon Kim;David A. Chiriboga

  • Health status of older Asian Americans in California.

    Giyeon Kim;David A. Chiriboga;Yuri Jang;Seungah Lee

  • Knowledge of Alzheimer’s Disease, Feelings of Shame, and Awareness of Services Among Korean American Elders

    Yuri Jang;Giyeon Kim;David Chiriboga

  • PURPOSE IN LIFE PROTECTS AGAINST COGNITIVE DECLINE AMONG OLDER ADULTS

    Giyeon Kim;Su Hyun Shin;Monica Scicolone;Patricia A Parmelee

  • A meta-analysis of the factor structure of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): the effects of language.

    Giyeon Kim;Jamie DeCoster;Chao-Hui Huang;Ami N. Bryant

  • Cultural Equivalence in Depressive Symptoms in Older White, Black, and Mexican‐American Adults

    Giyeon Kim;David A. Chiriboga;Yuri Jang

  • Factors associated with mental health service use in Latino and Asian immigrant elders.

    Giyeon Kim;Yuri Jang;David A. Chiriboga;Grace X. Ma

  • Race/Ethnicity and the Factor Structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: A Meta-Analysis

    Unknown

  • Associations Between Self-Rated Mental Health and Psychiatric Disorders Among Older Adults: Do Racial/Ethnic Differences Exist?

    Giyeon Kim;Jamie DeCoster;David A. Chiriboga;Yuri Jang

  • Perceived discrimination, sense of control, and depressive symptoms among Korean American older adults.

    Yuri Jang;David A. Chiriboga;Giyeon Kim;Sunghan Rhew

  • Racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare use, delayed care, and management of diabetes mellitus in older adults in California

    Giyeon Kim;Katy L. Ford;David A. Chiriboga;Dara H. Sorkin

  • Widowhood Status as a Risk Factor for Cognitive Decline among Older Adults.

    Su Hyun Shin;Giyeon Kim;Soohyun Park

  • Digital technology use and depressive symptoms among older adults in Korea: beneficial for those who have fewer social interactions?

    Min-Ah Lee;Kenneth F Ferraro;Giyeon Kim

  • Depressive Symptoms in Four Racial and Ethnic Groups: The Survey of Older Floridians (SOF)

    Yuri Jang;David A. Chiriboga;Giyeon Kim;Karon Phillips

  • Health Perception and Depressive Symptoms Among Older Korean Americans

    Yuri Jang;Giyeon Kim;David A. Chiriboga

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Chiriboga
David A. Chiriboga University of South Florida
Yuri Jang
Yuri Jang University of Southern California
Patricia A. Parmelee
Patricia A. Parmelee University of Alabama
Jamie DeCoster
Jamie DeCoster University of Virginia
Rebecca S. Allen
Rebecca S. Allen University of Alabama
Martin Sellbom
Martin Sellbom Monash University
Benjamin G. Druss
Benjamin G. Druss Emory University
Marjorie Kleinman
Marjorie Kleinman Columbia University
Grace X. Ma
Grace X. Ma Temple University
Margarita Alegría
Margarita Alegría Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring psychologists have several exciting paths to pursue their education and career goals online. For those eager to fast-track their studies, accelerated degree programs online offer a flexible option to earn a psychology degree faster than traditional routes.

If your goal is clinical practice, it’s vital to consider clinical psychology apa accredited programs. These programs, recognized by the American Psychological Association, ensure rigorous training and are often essential for licensure.

Candidates interested in the practitioner-scholar model can explore apa accredited psyd programs. A PsyD is designed for those who want to focus more on applied practice than research.

For specialization in behavior analysis, seeking out bcba certification schools is recommended. BCBA certification can open doors to roles in education, mental health, and therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Giyeon Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles