World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
8039
World Ranking
7799
National Ranking
179

Mirjam Münch publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mirjam Münch sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 100 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mirjam Münch D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mirjam Münch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mirjam Münch is affiliated with Massey University in New Zealand and specializes in neuroscience with a focus on circadian rhythms, sleep, and the impact of light on physiology. Their research encompasses several subfields including endocrine and autonomic systems, experimental and cognitive psychology, global and planetary change, cognitive neuroscience, and physiology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Impact of Light on Environment and Health
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Dietary Effects on Health
  • Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Mirjam Münch include:

  • "Recommendations for daytime, evening, and nighttime indoor light exposure to best support physiology, sleep, and wakefulness in healthy adults" (2022), published in PLoS Biology
  • "The relevance of daylight for humans" (2020), published in Biochemical Pharmacology
  • "The Role of Daylight for Humans: Gaps in Current Knowledge" (2020), published in Clocks & Sleep
  • "Chronotype Differences in Body Composition, Dietary Intake and Eating Behavior Outcomes: A Scoping Systematic Review" (2022), published in Advances in Nutrition
  • "ENLIGHT: A consensus checklist for reporting laboratory-based studies on the non-visual effects of light in humans" (2023), published in EBioMedicine

Frequent coauthors working alongside Mirjam Münch include:

  • Christian Cajochen
  • Debra J. Skene
  • Charles A. Czeisler
  • Manuel Spitschan
  • Oliver Stefani

Their work is frequently published in journals such as:

  • Sleep Health
  • Clocks & Sleep
  • SLEEP Advances
  • PLoS Biology
  • Biochemical Pharmacology

Best Publications

  • High sensitivity of human melatonin, alertness, thermoregulation, and heart rate to short wavelength light.

    Christian Cajochen;Mirjam Münch;Szymon Kobialka;Kurt Kräuchi

  • Recommendations for daytime, evening, and nighttime indoor light exposure to best support physiology, sleep, and wakefulness in healthy adults

    Unknown

  • Sex difference in the near-24-hour intrinsic period of the human circadian timing system

    Jeanne F. Duffy;Sean W. Cain;Anne Marie Chang;Andrew J.K. Phillips

  • Age-related changes in the circadian and homeostatic regulation of human sleep.

    Christian Cajochen;Mirjam Münch;Vera Knoblauch;Katharina Blatter

  • Encoding Difficulty Promotes Postlearning Changes in Sleep Spindle Activity during Napping

    Christina Schmidt;Philippe Peigneux;Vincenzo Muto;Maja Schenkel

  • Gender and age differences in psychomotor vigilance performance under differential sleep pressure conditions

    Katharina Blatter;Peter Graw;Mirjam Münch;Vera Knoblauch

  • High-accuracy determination of internal circadian time from a single blood sample

    Nicole Wittenbrink;Bharath Ananthasubramaniam;Mirjam Münch;Barbara Koller

  • Wavelength-dependent effects of evening light exposure on sleep architecture and sleep EEG power density in men.

    Mirjam Münch;Szymon Kobialka;Roland Steiner;Peter Oelhafen

  • Effects of realistic office daylighting and electric lighting conditions on visual comfort, alertness and mood

    Apiparn Borisuit;Friedrich Linhart;Jean-Louis Scartezzini;Mirjam Münch

  • Evidence that the Lunar Cycle Influences Human Sleep

    Christian Cajochen;Songül Altanay-Ekici;Mirjam Münch;Sylvia Frey

  • Comparison of subjective and objective assessments of sleep in healthy older subjects without sleep complaints

    Deirdre O'donnell;Edward J. Silva;Mirjam Münch;Mirjam Münch;Joseph M. Ronda;Joseph M. Ronda

  • Age-related attenuation of the evening circadian arousal signal in humans

    Mirjam Münch;Vera Knoblauch;Katharina Blatter;Carmen Schröder

  • Evening exposure to blue light stimulates the expression of the clock gene PER2 in humans

    Christian Cajochen;Corinne Jud;Mirjam Münch;Szymon Kobialka

  • The relevance of daylight for humans.

    Anna Wirz-Justice;Debra J. Skene;Mirjam Münch

  • The frontal predominance in human EEG delta activity after sleep loss decreases with age

    Mirjam Münch;Vera Knoblauch;Katharina Blatter;Carmen Schröder

  • The Role of Daylight for Humans: Gaps in Current Knowledge

    Mirjam Münch;Anna Wirz-Justice;Steven A Brown;Thomas Kantermann

  • Subjective well-being is modulated by circadian phase, sleep pressure, age, and gender.

    Angelina Birchler-Pedross;Carmen M. Schröder;Mirjam Münch;Vera Knoblauch

  • Chronotype Differences in Body Composition, Dietary Intake and Eating Behavior Outcomes: A Scoping Systematic Review

    Unknown

  • Blue-Enriched Morning Light as a Countermeasure to Light at the Wrong Time: Effects on Cognition, Sleepiness, Sleep, and Circadian Phase.

    Mirjam Münch;Claudia Nowozin;Johannes Regente;Frederik Bes

  • Effects of prior light exposure on early evening performance, subjective sleepiness, and hormonal secretion

    Mirjam Münch;Friedrich Linhart;Apiparn Borisuit;Susanne M. Jaeggi

  • Circadian and wake-dependent effects on the pupil light reflex in response to narrow-bandwidth light pulses.

    Mirjam Münch;Lorette Léon;Sylvain V. Crippa;Aki Kawasaki

  • Light Modulation of Human Clocks, Wake, and Sleep.

    Abhishek S Prayag;Mirjam Münch;Daniel Aeschbach;Sarah L Chellappa

  • Light and chronobiology: implications for health and disease.

    Mirjam Münch;Vivien Bromundt

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Cajochen
Christian Cajochen University of Basel
Anna Wirz-Justice
Anna Wirz-Justice University of Basel
Charles A. Czeisler
Charles A. Czeisler Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jean-Louis Scartezzini
Jean-Louis Scartezzini École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Jeanne F. Duffy
Jeanne F. Duffy Brigham and Women's Hospital
Orfeu M. Buxton
Orfeu M. Buxton Pennsylvania State University
Dieter Kunz
Dieter Kunz Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Kenneth P. Wright
Kenneth P. Wright University of Colorado Boulder
Steven Shea
Steven Shea Columbia University
Sarah Laxhmi Chellappa
Sarah Laxhmi Chellappa University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience can open doors to a diverse set of online degrees and careers in healthcare, research, and education. For those seeking a fast track into the field or an area related to mental health, consider online certificate programs that pay well and help enhance your skillset without long-term commitment.

If you prefer a flexible and accessible learning path, opting for one of the easy online degrees can provide foundational knowledge in psychology or health sciences, making it simpler to transition into neuroscience or related roles.

Those interested in applying neuroscience concepts in social work should explore online MSW programs. These programs train professionals to integrate behavioral science and social care, broadening career pathways in community and health settings.

For specialized work with behavior analysis, such as roles in therapy or educational support, check out bcba programs online. Earning this credential can qualify you for rewarding careers and deepen your expertise in behavioral neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Mirjam Münch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles