World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
9537
World Ranking
5339
National Ranking
2379

Jonathan P. Miller publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Miller sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 199 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jonathan P. Miller D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan P. Miller is affiliated with Case Western Reserve University in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a significant focus on subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, biomedical engineering, and pathology and forensic medicine.

Their work covers several main topics, including neuroscience and neural engineering, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, muscle activation and electromyography studies, neurological disorders and treatments, trigeminal neuralgia and treatments, tactile and sensory interactions, and hospital admissions and outcomes.

Jonathan P. Miller has contributed to a number of papers published in a variety of scientific venues. Notable recent publications include:

  • Interim Safety Profile From the Feasibility Study of the BrainGate Neural Interface System, 2023, Neurology
  • Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Neurophysiology, Adaptive DBS, Virtual Reality, Neuroethics and Technology, 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Evoking stable and precise tactile sensations via multi-electrode intracortical microstimulation of the somatosensory cortex, 2024, Nature Biomedical Engineering
  • Reconnecting the Hand and Arm to the Brain: Efficacy of Neural Interfaces for Sensorimotor Restoration After Tetraplegia, 2023, Neurosurgery
  • Neural Representation of Observed, Imagined, and Attempted Grasping Force in Motor Cortex of Individuals with Chronic Tetraplegia, 2020, Scientific Reports

Their frequent coauthors reflect ongoing collaborative efforts in neural interface research and related fields. These include:

  • A. Bolu Ajiboye
  • Robert F. Kirsch
  • Jennifer A. Sweet
  • William D. Memberg
  • Emily L. Graczyk

Jonathan P. Miller's publications have appeared most often in journals such as Neurosurgery, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Spinal Cord Series and Cases, Neurology, and Nature Biomedical Engineering.

Best Publications

  • Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration

    A Bolu Ajiboye;A Bolu Ajiboye;Francis R Willett;Francis R Willett;Daniel R Young;Daniel R Young;William D Memberg;William D Memberg

  • Direct recordings of grid-like neuronal activity in human spatial navigation

    Joshua Jacobs;Christoph T Weidemann;Jonathan F Miller;Alec Solway

  • Neural Activity in Human Hippocampal Formation Reveals the Spatial Context of Retrieved Memories

    Jonathan F. Miller;Markus Neufang;Alec Solway;Armin Brandt

  • Direct Electrical Stimulation of the Human Entorhinal Region and Hippocampus Impairs Memory

    Joshua Jacobs;Jonathan Miller;Sang Ah Lee;Sang Ah Lee;Tom Coffey

  • Parameters of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Their Role in Electrical Charge Delivery: A Review

    Jonathan P. Miller;Sam Eldabe;Eric Buchser;Lisa M. Johanek

  • Functionally distinct high and low theta oscillations in the human hippocampus

    Abhinav Goyal;Jonathan Miller;Salman E. Qasim;Andrew J. Watrous

  • Cavernoma-related epilepsy: review and recommendations for management--report of the Surgical Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

    Felix Rosenow;Mario A Alonso-Vanegas;Christoph Baumgartner;Ingmar Blümcke

  • Low-frequency electrical stimulation of a fiber tract in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Mohamad Z. Koubeissi;Emine Kahriman;Tanvir U. Syed;Jonathan P. Miller

  • Oscillatory correlates of the primacy effect in episodic memory.

    Per B. Sederberg;Lynne V. Gauthier;Vitaly Terushkin;Jonathan F. Miller

  • Lateralized hippocampal oscillations underlie distinct aspects of human spatial memory and navigation.

    Jonathan F Miller;Andrew J. Watrous;Melina Eirene Tsitsiklis;Sang Ah Lee

  • The temporal contiguity effect predicts episodic memory performance

    Per B. Sederberg;Jonathan F. Miller;Marc W. Howard;Michael J. Kahana

  • Radiographic evaluation of trigeminal neurovascular compression in patients with and without trigeminal neuralgia

    Jonathan P. Miller;Feridun Acar;Bronwyn E. Hamilton;Kim J. Burchiel

  • Rapid calibration of an intracortical brain-computer interface for people with tetraplegia

    David M. Brandman;David M. Brandman;Tommy Hosman;Jad Saab;Jad Saab;Michael C. Burkhart

  • Classification of trigeminal neuralgia: clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic implications in a series of 144 patients undergoing microvascular decompression.

    Jonathan P. Miller;Feridun Acar;Kim J. Burchiel

  • Predictors of long-term success after microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: Clinical article

    Jonathan Paul Miller;Stephen T. Magill;Feridun Acar;Kim J. Burchiel

  • Implantation of Stereoelectroencephalography Electrodes: A Systematic Review.

    Francesco Cardinale;Giuseppe Casaceli;Fabio Raneri;Jonathan Paul Miller

  • Visual-spatial memory may be enhanced with theta burst deep brain stimulation of the fornix: a preliminary investigation with four cases.

    Jonathan P. Miller;Jennifer A. Sweet;Christopher M. Bailey;Charles N. Munyon

  • Preoperative visualization of neurovascular anatomy in trigeminal neuralgia

    Jonathan Paul Miller;Feridun Acar;Bronwyn Hamilton;Kim Burchiel

  • The effects of direct brain stimulation in humans depend on frequency, amplitude, and white-matter proximity.

    Uma R. Mohan;Andrew J. Watrous;Jonathan F. Miller;Bradley C. Lega

  • Phase-tuned neuronal firing encodes human contextual representations for navigational goals

    Andrew J Watrous;Andrew J Watrous;Jonathan Miller;Salman E Qasim;Itzhak Fried

  • Hippocampal Neurophysiologic Changes after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Potential Neuromodulation Treatment Approaches.

    Fady Girgis;Jonathan Pace;Jennifer A. Sweet;Jonathan Paul Miller

  • Efficacy of N-acetyl cysteine in traumatic brain injury

    Katharine Eakin;Renana Baratz-Goldstein;Chiam G. Pick;Ofra Zindel

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Lüders
Hans Lüders Case Western Reserve University
Joshua J. Jacobs
Joshua J. Jacobs Rush University Medical Center
Leigh R. Hochberg
Leigh R. Hochberg Harvard University
Michael R. Sperling
Michael R. Sperling Thomas Jefferson University
Sameer A. Sheth
Sameer A. Sheth Baylor College of Medicine
Joel M. Stein
Joel M. Stein University of Pennsylvania
Kim J. Burchiel
Kim J. Burchiel Oregon Health & Science University
Ashwini Sharan
Ashwini Sharan Thomas Jefferson University
Krishna V. Shenoy
Krishna V. Shenoy Stanford University
Michael J. Kahana
Michael J. Kahana University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan P. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles