World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jaimie M. Henderson

Jaimie M. Henderson

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
21966
World Ranking
2839
National Ranking
1319

Jaimie M. Henderson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaimie M. Henderson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 163 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jaimie M. Henderson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaimie M. Henderson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jaimie M. Henderson is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist's research topics encompass EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, Muscle Activation and Electromyography Studies, Neurological Disorders and Treatments, Advanced Memory and Neural Computing, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology.

Recent papers by Jaimie M. Henderson include:

  • High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting (2021, Nature)
  • A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis (2023, Nature)
  • Deep posteromedial cortical rhythm in dissociation (2020, Nature)
  • Hand Knob Area of Premotor Cortex Represents the Whole Body in a Compositional Way (2020, Cell)
  • Home Use of a Percutaneous Wireless Intracortical Brain-Computer Interface by Individuals With Tetraplegia (2021, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Henderson include Leigh R. Hochberg, Francis R. Willett, Donald T. Avansino, Krishna V. Shenoy, and Foram Kamdar.

Regular publication venues for their research are diverse and include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature, Journal of Neural Engineering, Cell, and Nature Medicine.

Best Publications

  • Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy

    Robert Fisher;Vicenta Salanova;Thomas Witt;Robert Worth

  • Optical Deconstruction of Parkinsonian Neural Circuitry

    Viviana Gradinaru;Murtaza Mogri;Kimberly R. Thompson;Jaimie M. Henderson

  • Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease: An Expert Consensus and Review of Key Issues

    Jeff M. Bronstein;Michele Tagliati;Ron L. Alterman;Andres M. Lozano

  • Long-term efficacy and safety of thalamic stimulation for drug-resistant partial epilepsy

    Vicenta Salanova;Thomas Witt;Robert Worth;Thomas R. Henry

  • High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting

    Francis R. Willett;Francis R. Willett;Donald T. Avansino;Leigh R. Hochberg;Jaimie M. Henderson

  • Inferring single-trial neural population dynamics using sequential auto-encoders.

    Chethan Pandarinath;Daniel J. O’Shea;Jasmine Collins;Rafal Jozefowicz;Rafal Jozefowicz

  • AAV2-GAD gene therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, sham-surgery controlled, randomised trial

    Peter A LeWitt;Ali R Rezai;Maureen A Leehey;Steven G Ojemann

  • Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation

    Christopher R. Butson;Scott E. Cooper;Jaimie M. Henderson;Cameron C. McIntyre

  • High performance communication by people with paralysis using an intracortical brain-computer interface

    Chethan Pandarinath;Paul Nuyujukian;Christine H Blabe;Brittany L Sorice

  • Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial

    Paul E. Holtzheimer;Mustafa M. Husain;Mustafa M. Husain;Sarah H. Lisanby;Stephan F. Taylor

  • A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis

    Unknown

  • Clinical translation of a high-performance neural prosthesis

    Vikash Gilja;Chethan Pandarinath;Christine H Blabe;Paul Nuyujukian

  • Virtual typing by people with tetraplegia using a self-calibrating intracortical brain-computer interface

    Beata Jarosiewicz;Beata Jarosiewicz;Anish A. Sarma;Anish A. Sarma;Daniel Bacher;Nicolas Y. Masse

  • Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson's disease: case report.

    Jaimie M. Henderson;Jean Tkach;Michael Phillips;Kenneth Baker

  • The correction of stereotactic inaccuracy caused by brain shift using an intraoperative ultrasound device

    Richard D. Buchholz;David D. Yeh;Jason Trobaugh;Jason Trobaugh;Leslie L. McDurmont

  • Advanced neurotechnologies for chronic neural interfaces: new horizons and clinical opportunities.

    Daryl R. Kipke;William Shain;György Buzsáki;E. Fetz

  • The STN beta-band profile in Parkinson's disease is stationary and shows prolonged attenuation after deep brain stimulation.

    Helen Bronte-Stewart;Crista Barberini;Mandy Miller Koop;Bruce C. Hill

  • Gene delivery of neurturin to putamen and substantia nigra in Parkinson disease: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

    C. Warren Olanow;Raymond T. Bartus;Tiffany L. Baumann;Stewart Factor

  • Deep posteromedial cortical rhythm in dissociation.

    Sam Vesuna;Isaac V. Kauvar;Ethan Richman;Felicity Gore

  • Instrument guidance for stereotactic surgery

    Joel I. Franck;Frederick C. Haer;Ronald J. Franklin;Kevin J. Frank

  • High frequency deep brain stimulation attenuates subthalamic and cortical rhythms in Parkinson's disease

    Diane Whitmer;Camille de Solages;Bruce C Hill;Hong Yu

  • Method and device for displaying predicted volume of influence

    Cameron C. McIntyre;Christopher R. Butson;John D. Hall;Jaimie M. Henderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Leigh R. Hochberg
Leigh R. Hochberg Harvard University
Krishna V. Shenoy
Krishna V. Shenoy Stanford University
Jonathan P. Miller
Jonathan P. Miller Case Western Reserve University
Helen Bronte-Stewart
Helen Bronte-Stewart Stanford University
Ali R. Rezai
Ali R. Rezai West Virginia University
Christopher R. Butson
Christopher R. Butson University of Utah
Cameron C. McIntyre
Cameron C. McIntyre Duke University
Emad N. Eskandar
Emad N. Eskandar Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Casey H. Halpern
Casey H. Halpern University of Pennsylvania
Karl Deisseroth
Karl Deisseroth Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens diverse career options in research, therapy, healthcare, and more. Many students explore related fields for greater flexibility and specialization, and online programs make these pathways increasingly accessible.

For those considering psychology, the cheapest psychology degree online options can help you earn a respected credential without incurring heavy debt. If your interests lean toward social services or community work, an msw degree online (Master of Social Work) can be a practical next step, with programs designed for various academic backgrounds.

If your goal is to practice clinical psychology, accredited doctoral programs such as online psyd programs apa accredited are essential for state licensure and advanced practice. Alternatively, for careers in therapy and counseling, you might want to consider accelerated mft programs online (Marriage and Family Therapy), which offer a faster route into the profession.

By exploring these online degree options, students can tailor their educational journey and professional future to best fit their interests in neuroscience and its closely allied disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Jaimie M. Henderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles