World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
15725
World Ranking
15399
National Ranking
6427

David D. Pollock publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David D. Pollock sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 137 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David D. Pollock D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David D. Pollock sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David D. Pollock is affiliated with the University of Colorado Denver in the United States and focuses on research within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their scientific contributions span subfields such as molecular biology, genetics, parasitology, ecology, and infectious diseases.

Their work centers around multiple main topics, including:

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure
  • RNA and Protein Synthesis Mechanisms

They have coauthored with several frequent collaborators, indicating ongoing partnerships in their research. These collaborators include:

  • Todd A. Castoe
  • Elizabeth J. Carlton
  • Kristen J. Wade
  • Zachary L. Nikolakis
  • Blair W. Perry

Publication venues commonly featuring their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • UNC Libraries
  • Mobile DNA

Examples of recent published papers authored or coauthored by David D. Pollock are as follows:

  • "Amalgamated cross-species transcriptomes reveal organ-specific propensity in gene expression evolution," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Finding and extending ancient simple sequence repeat-derived regions in the human genome," 2020, Mobile DNA
  • "Detecting macroevolutionary genotype-phenotype associations using error-corrected rates of protein convergence," 2023, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "Viral CpG Deficiency Provides No Evidence That Dogs Were Intermediate Hosts for SARS-CoV-2," 2020, Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • "Population genomic analyses of schistosome parasites highlight critical challenges facing endgame elimination efforts," 2021, Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Repetitive Elements May Comprise Over Two-Thirds of the Human Genome

    A. P. Jason de Koning;Wanjun Gu;Todd A. Castoe;Mark A. Batzer

  • SARS-CoV-2 evolution during treatment of chronic infection.

    Steven A. Kemp;Dami A. Collier;Dami A. Collier;Rawlings P. Datir;Isabella A. T. M. Ferreira

  • The genome of a songbird

    Wesley C. Warren;David F. Clayton;Hans Ellegren;Arthur P. Arnold

  • LAUNCHING MICROSATELLITES : A REVIEW OF MUTATION PROCESSES AND METHODS OF PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE

    D. B. Goldstein;D. D. Pollock

  • Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences

    Tarjei S. Mikkelsen;Tarjei S. Mikkelsen;Matthew J. Wakefield;Bronwen Aken;Chris T. Amemiya

  • The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals

    Jessica Alföldi;Federica Di Palma;Manfred Grabherr;Christina Williams

  • The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system

    Freek J. Vonk;Freek J. Vonk;Freek J. Vonk;Nicholas R. Casewell;Nicholas R. Casewell;Christiaan V. Henkel;Alysha M. Heimberg

  • Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference.

    David D. Pollock;Derrick J. Zwickl;Jimmy A. McGuire;David M. Hillis

  • Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference

    David M. Hillis;David D. Pollock;Jimmy A. McGuire;Derrick J. Zwickl

  • Three crocodilian genomes reveal ancestral patterns of evolution among archosaurs

    Richard E. Green;Edward L. Braun;Joel Armstrong;Dent Earl

  • The western painted turtle genome, a model for the evolution of extreme physiological adaptations in a slowly evolving lineage

    H. Bradley Shaffer;Patrick Minx;Daniel E. Warren;Andrew M. Shedlock;Andrew M. Shedlock

  • Evidence for an ancient adaptive episode of convergent molecular evolution.

    Todd A. Castoe;A. P Jason De Koning;Hyun Min Kim;Wanjun Gu;Wanjun Gu

  • The Burmese python genome reveals the molecular basis for extreme adaptation in snakes

    Todd A. Castoe;Todd A. Castoe;A. P. Jason de Koning;A. P. Jason de Koning;Kathryn T. Hall;Daren C. Card

  • Rapid microsatellite identification from illumina paired-end genomic sequencing in two birds and a snake

    Todd A. Castoe;Alexander W. Poole;A. P. Jason de Koning;Kenneth L. Jones

  • The beetle gut: a hyperdiverse source of novel yeasts.

    Sung-Oui Suh;Joseph V. McHugh;David D. Pollock;Meredith Blackwell

  • Coevolving Protein Residues: Maximum Likelihood Identification and Relationship to Structure

    David D. Pollock;William R. Taylor;Nick Goldman

  • Gene-specific RNA polymerase II phosphorylation and the CTD code.

    Hyunmin Kim;Benjamin Erickson;Weifei Luo;Weifei Luo;David Seward

  • The interface of protein structure, protein biophysics, and molecular evolution.

    David A Liberles;Sarah A Teichmann;Ivet Bahar;Ugo Bastolla

  • Rapid identification of thousands of copperhead snake (Agkistrodon contortrix) microsatellite loci from modest amounts of 454 shotgun genome sequence

    Todd A. Castoe;Alexander W. Poole;Wanjun Gu;A. P. Jason de Koning

  • Assessing the accuracy of ancestral protein reconstruction methods.

    Paul D Williams;David D Pollock;Benjamin P Blackburne;Richard A Goldstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Todd A. Castoe
Todd A. Castoe The University of Texas at Arlington
Richard A. Goldstein
Richard A. Goldstein University College London
David A. Ray
David A. Ray Texas Tech University
Cédric Feschotte
Cédric Feschotte Cornell University
Scott V. Edwards
Scott V. Edwards Harvard University
David Goldstein
David Goldstein University of New South Wales
Wesley C. Warren
Wesley C. Warren University of Missouri
Chris P. Ponting
Chris P. Ponting University of Edinburgh
Matthew Breen
Matthew Breen North Carolina State University
Mark A. Batzer
Mark A. Batzer Louisiana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are passionate about Biology or Biochemistry, a range of related online degree programs and career paths are available in the USA. These flexible online degrees allow students to expand their expertise while staying up-to-date with industry trends and workplace needs.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, best online dha programs can pave the way to executive roles in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations. If you are drawn to pharmaceuticals, exploring pharm d online programs is a great way to qualify as a licensed pharmacist or pharmaceutical researcher.

Beyond health sciences, online programs also cover fitness and movement science. With fitness degrees online, students can pursue careers as wellness coaches, personal trainers, or exercise physiologists. In addition, the best online kinesiology degree programs prepare graduates for work in sports medicine, rehabilitation, and human performance.

Altogether, these online pathways provide Biology and Biochemistry students with a diverse choice of specializations that lead to meaningful and rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing David D. Pollock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles