World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
6369
World Ranking
12480
National Ranking
32

Lech Polkowski publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lech Polkowski sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 228 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lech Polkowski D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lech Polkowski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lech Polkowski is affiliated with the Polish-Japanese Academy of Information Technology in Poland. Their research primarily spans the domain of computer science, with a strong emphasis on artificial intelligence and computational theory. The work conducted engages deeply with logical and mathematical foundations as well as applied areas within AI.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

The subfields of study cover a range of specialized areas:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Information Systems
  • Software

Their research topics reflect a focus on logical structures and reasoning, as well as foundational and applied computational logic:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Advanced Algebra and Logic
  • Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Lech Polkowski has authored several papers, notable among them are:

  • On the Compactness Property of Mereological Spaces, 2020, Fundamenta Informaticae
  • On rough mereology and VC-dimension in treatment of decision prediction for open world decision systems, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Machine Learning via rough mereology, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Two monographs published by Springer Nature contribute to their academic record:

  • Logics for Computer and Data Sciences, and Artificial Intelligence, 2022
  • Logic: Reference Book for Computer Scientists, 2023

Regarding venues where their work frequently appears, the main outlets include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Fundamenta Informaticae

Best Publications

  • Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery 2

    Lech Polkowski;Andrzej Skowron

  • Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery 2: Applications, Case Studies, and Software Systems

    Lech Polkowski;J. Kacprzyk;A. Skowron

  • Rough mereology: A new paradigm for approximate reasoning

    Lech Polkowski;Andrzej Skowron

  • Rough Sets: Mathematical Foundations

    Lech Polkowski

  • Rough Set Methods and Applications

    Lech Polkowski;Shusaku Tsumoto;Tsau Y. Lin

  • Methodology and applications

    Lech Polkowski;Andrzej Skowron

  • Rough set methods and applications: new developments in knowledge discovery in information systems

    Lech Polkowski;Shusaku Tsumoto;Tsau Young Lin

  • Rough Sets

    Unknown

  • Rough-Neuro-Computing: Techniques for Computing with Words

    Lech Polkowski;Sankar K. Pal;Andrzej Skowron

  • Towards adaptive calculus of granules

    L. Polkowski;A. Skowron

  • Rough Sets

    Lech Polkowski

  • Rough-Neural Computing

    Sankar K. Pal;Lech Polkowski;Andrzej Skowron

  • Rough Set Theory

    Zdzisław Pawlak;Lech Polkowski;Andrzej Skowron

  • Rough Mereology

    Lech Polkowski;Andrzej Skowron

  • Rough sets and current trends in computing : first international conference, RSCTC '98, Warsaw, Poland, June 22-26, 1998 : proceedings

    Rsctc;Lech Polkowski;Andrzej Skowron

  • Rough Mereological Calculi of Granules: A Rough Set Approach to Computation

    Lech Polkowski;Andrzej Skowron

  • Rough sets perspective on data and knowledge

    Andrzej Skowron;Jan Komorowski;Zdzislaw Pawlak;Lech Polkowski

  • Transactions on Rough Sets II

    James F. Peters;Andrzej Skowron;Didier Dubois;Jerzy W. Grzymała-Busse

  • Transactions on Rough Sets VI

    James F. Peters;Andrzej Skowron;Ivo Düntsch;Jerzy Grzymała-Busse

  • Approximate Reasoning by Parts

    Lech Polkowski

  • Approximate Reasoning by Parts: An Introduction to Rough Mereology

    Lech Polkowski

  • Rough mereological foundations for design, analysis, synthesis, and control in distributed systems

    Andrzej Skowron;Lech Polkowski

  • Formal granular calculi based on rough inclusions

    L. Polkowski

  • Rough sets and current trends in computing: proceedings of the 8th international conference

    J. Yao;Y. Yang;R. Slowinski;Salvatore Greco

  • Rough sets for data mining and knowledge discovery

    Jan Komorowski;Lech Polkowski;Andrzej Skowron

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrzej Skowron
Andrzej Skowron University of Warsaw
Shusaku Tsumoto
Shusaku Tsumoto Shimane University
James F. Peters
James F. Peters University of Manitoba
Tsau Young Lin
Tsau Young Lin San Jose State University
Sankar K. Pal
Sankar K. Pal Indian Statistical Institute
Yiyu Yao
Yiyu Yao University of Regina
Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse
Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse University of Kansas
Yuefeng Li
Yuefeng Li Queensland University of Technology
Masahiro Inuiguchi
Masahiro Inuiguchi Osaka University
Salvatore Greco
Salvatore Greco University of Portsmouth

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and career options. Students interested in expanding their expertise beyond CS often consider related fields. For example, those passionate about foundational sciences may look into online physics degrees to deepen their analytical and problem-solving skills.

The demand for tech professionals continues to grow, and specializations can boost your prospects. Many opt for data science degrees to focus on areas such as machine learning, AI, and big data. Others may pursue an online master’s in electrical engineering degree, which pairs well with CS skills for careers in hardware and embedded systems.

Not everyone has the time for a full degree. If you’re looking for a quicker way to enter the workforce or upskill, consider easy certifications to get online. These options can help you adapt to the fast-changing tech sector, often resulting in well-paying roles with minimal investment of time.

Best Scientists Citing Lech Polkowski

Trending Scientists