World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 42 7692 7097 413 397 193 6253

Luisa Chiapparini publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Luisa Chiapparini between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Luisa Chiapparini published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2021. 13 of the 221 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2021. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 2 publications
1995 2025

221 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Luisa Chiapparini: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 2
2001 0
2002 2
2003 6
2004 5
2005 3
2006 6
2007 3
2008 8
2009 6
2010 5
2011 9
2012 8
2013 6
2014 12
2015 7
2016 6
2017 12
2018 9
2019 15
2020 13
2021 25
2022 21
2023 15
2024 11
2025 2
Total 221
Download as CSV

Luisa Chiapparini publications per year - data summary

  • Luisa Chiapparini, a Neuroscience scholar from Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, has 221 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 25 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1995 and 1998, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 31 years in the span carry no publications at all (1996, 1997 and 2001).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.9 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 74 publications, 33% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2005: 22 publications (2.0 per year); 2006-2016: 76 publications (6.9 per year); 2017-2025: 123 publications (13.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Luisa Chiapparini publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luisa Chiapparini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 193 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302 193
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Luisa Chiapparini publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 38–47 to 887+ publications.
  • Luisa Chiapparini, a Neuroscience scholar from Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, records 193 publications - the 60th percentile of the discipline.
  • 60% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Luisa Chiapparini, and about 40% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 158–167 publications range, and Luisa Chiapparini ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 98–107 publications, holding 539 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 76% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 248–257 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 887 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Luisa Chiapparini D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luisa Chiapparini sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 42
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Luisa Chiapparini D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 68 ranges running from 30–31 to 163+ D-Index.
  • Luisa Chiapparini, a Neuroscience scholar from Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, records 42 D-Index - the 22nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 22% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Luisa Chiapparini, and about 78% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 54–55 D-Index range, and Luisa Chiapparini ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 46–47 D-Index, holding 512 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 65% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 62–63 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Luisa Chiapparini is affiliated with the Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta in Italy. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine, particularly focusing on neurology and related molecular and genetic fields. The body of work includes 167 publications in Medicine and 54 in Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with additional specialization in subfields such as Neurology, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The key topics covered in Chiapparini's research are diverse and include glioma diagnosis and treatment, migraine and headache studies, trigeminal neuralgia and treatments, fetal and pediatric neurological disorders, spinal dysraphism and malformations, cancer genomics and diagnostics, and RNA regulation and disease.

Frequent coauthors include Alessandra Erbetta, Maria Grazia Bruzzone, Maura Massimino, Marco Moscatelli, and Bianca Pollo, highlighting a collaborative research network.

The principal venues where Chiapparini's work has been published reflect specialization in neurological and oncological sciences. These venues include Neurological Sciences, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Neuro-Oncology, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, and The Lancet Oncology.

Recent notable publications include:

  • Diagnosis and treatment of Chiari malformation and syringomyelia in adults: international consensus document (2021, Neurological Sciences)
  • Response assessment in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group (2020, The Lancet Oncology)
  • Diagnosis and treatment of Chiari malformation type 1 in children: the International Consensus Document (2021, Neurological Sciences)
  • Second series by the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of children and adolescents with intracranial ependymoma: an integrated molecular and clinical characterization with a long-term follow-up (2020, Neuro-Oncology)
  • Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group (2022, The Lancet Oncology)

Best Publications

  • Age-related iron deposition in the basal ganglia: Quantitative analysis in healthy subjects

    Domenico Aquino;Alberto Bizzi;Marina Grisoli;Barbara Garavaglia

  • Anti-amyloid β autoantibodies in cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation: implications for amyloid-modifying therapies.

    Fabrizio Piazza;Steven M. Greenberg;Mario Savoiardo;Margherita Gardinetti

  • Exome Sequence Reveals Mutations in CoA Synthase as a Cause of Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation

    Sabrina Dusi;Lorella Valletta;Tobias B. Haack;Yugo Tsuchiya

  • Diagnostic imaging in 13 cases of Rasmussen's encephalitis: can early MRI suggest the diagnosis?

    L. Chiapparini;T. Granata;L. Farina;E. Ciceri

  • Stimulation of the globus pallidus internus for childhood-onset dystonia.

    Giovanna Zorzi;Carlo Marras;Nardo Nardocci;Angelo Franzini

  • Overlapping phenotypes in complex spastic paraplegias SPG11, SPG15, SPG35 and SPG48

    Viviana Pensato;Barbara Castellotti;Cinzia Gellera;Davide Pareyson

  • Rasmussen’s encephalitis Early characteristics allow diagnosis

    Tiziana Granata;G. Gobbi;R. Spreafico;F. Vigevano

  • Periventricular nodular heterotopia: Classification, epileptic history, and genesis of epileptic discharges

    Giorgio Battaglia;Luisa Chiapparini;Silvana Franceschetti;Elena Freri

  • Iron‐related MRI images in patients with pantothenate kinase–associated neurodegeneration (PKAN) treated with deferiprone: Results of a phase II pilot trial

    Giovanna Zorzi;Federica Zibordi;Luisa Chiapparini;Enrico Bertini

  • Spinal radiological findings in nine patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension

    L Chiapparini;L Farina;L D'Incerti;A Erbetta

  • Spontaneous intracranial hypotension syndrome: a novel speculative physiopathological hypothesis and a novel patch method in a series of 28 consecutive patients.

    Angelo Franzini;Giuseppe Messina;Vittoria Nazzi;Eliana Mea

  • MR Findings in Leigh Syndrome with COX Deficiency and SURF-1 Mutations

    Laura Farina;Luisa Chiapparini;Graziella Uziel;Marianna Bugiani

  • Can MR imaging diagnose adult-onset Alexander disease?

    L. Farina;D. Pareyson;L. Minati;I. Ceccherini

  • Spontaneous intracranial hypotension with deep brain swelling

    Mario Savoiardo;Ludovico Minati;Laura Farina;Tiziana De Simone

  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging Shows Different Topographic Involvement of the Thalamus in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Degeneration

    Alessandra Erbetta;M. L. Mandelli;M. Savoiardo;M. Grisoli

  • Response assessment in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group

    Tabitha M Cooney;Kenneth J Cohen;Carolina V Guimaraes;Girish Dhall

  • Pain processing in medication overuse headache: a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study.

    Stefania Ferraro;Licia Grazzi;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Domenico Aquino

  • Dural sinus thrombosis in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: Hypotheses on possible mechanisms.

    Mario Savoiardo;Silvia Armenise;Pantaleo Spagnolo;Tiziana De Simone

  • Headache and intracranial hypotension: neuroradiological findings.

    L. Chiapparini;E. Ciceri;S. Nappini;M. R. Castellani

  • Iatrogenic intracranial pseudoaneurysms: Neuroradiological and therapeutical considerations, including endovascular options

    E. F. M. Ciceri;C. Regna-Gladin;A. Erbetta;L. Chiapparini

Frequent Co-Authors

Tiziana Granata
Tiziana Granata Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Silvana Franceschetti
Silvana Franceschetti Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Enrico Bertini
Enrico Bertini Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital
Maria Luisa Mandelli
Maria Luisa Mandelli University of California, San Francisco
Pierangelo Veggiotti
Pierangelo Veggiotti University of Milan
Valeria Tiranti
Valeria Tiranti Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Giuseppe Lauria
Giuseppe Lauria University of Milan
Fabrizio Tagliavini
Fabrizio Tagliavini Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Franco Taroni
Franco Taroni University of Milan
Flavio Villani
Flavio Villani Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in neuroscience opens doors to various interdisciplinary careers. Many students look for flexible online programs to complement or diversify their education. Specialized options such as affordable msw programs online allow you to explore social work—a field closely linked to neurodevelopment and mental health.

If you are interested in applied behavioral science, consider bcba masters programs online. Board Certified Behavior Analysts play critical roles in supporting individuals with behavioral and neurological challenges.

Accelerated education is another popular option for those eager to enter the workforce quickly. Both online social work programs and accelerated bachelor's degree psychology programs offer fast-tracked pathways to careers intersecting with neuroscience, such as counseling, clinical research, and therapy.

These online degrees can expand your expertise while providing the flexibility needed for working professionals or non-traditional students. Exploring related fields helps build a diverse and adaptable career profile in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Luisa Chiapparini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles