World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
6253
World Ranking
7692
National Ranking
412

Luisa Chiapparini publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luisa Chiapparini sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 193 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Luisa Chiapparini D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luisa Chiapparini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luisa Chiapparini is affiliated with the Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta in Italy. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine, particularly focusing on neurology and related molecular and genetic fields. The body of work includes 167 publications in Medicine and 54 in Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with additional specialization in subfields such as Neurology, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The key topics covered in Chiapparini's research are diverse and include glioma diagnosis and treatment, migraine and headache studies, trigeminal neuralgia and treatments, fetal and pediatric neurological disorders, spinal dysraphism and malformations, cancer genomics and diagnostics, and RNA regulation and disease.

Frequent coauthors include Alessandra Erbetta, Maria Grazia Bruzzone, Maura Massimino, Marco Moscatelli, and Bianca Pollo, highlighting a collaborative research network.

The principal venues where Chiapparini's work has been published reflect specialization in neurological and oncological sciences. These venues include Neurological Sciences, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Neuro-Oncology, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, and The Lancet Oncology.

Recent notable publications include:

  • Diagnosis and treatment of Chiari malformation and syringomyelia in adults: international consensus document (2021, Neurological Sciences)
  • Response assessment in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group (2020, The Lancet Oncology)
  • Diagnosis and treatment of Chiari malformation type 1 in children: the International Consensus Document (2021, Neurological Sciences)
  • Second series by the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology of children and adolescents with intracranial ependymoma: an integrated molecular and clinical characterization with a long-term follow-up (2020, Neuro-Oncology)
  • Response assessment in paediatric intracranial ependymoma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group (2022, The Lancet Oncology)

Best Publications

  • Age-related iron deposition in the basal ganglia: Quantitative analysis in healthy subjects

    Domenico Aquino;Alberto Bizzi;Marina Grisoli;Barbara Garavaglia

  • Anti-amyloid β autoantibodies in cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation: implications for amyloid-modifying therapies.

    Fabrizio Piazza;Steven M. Greenberg;Mario Savoiardo;Margherita Gardinetti

  • Exome Sequence Reveals Mutations in CoA Synthase as a Cause of Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation

    Sabrina Dusi;Lorella Valletta;Tobias B. Haack;Yugo Tsuchiya

  • Diagnostic imaging in 13 cases of Rasmussen's encephalitis: can early MRI suggest the diagnosis?

    L. Chiapparini;T. Granata;L. Farina;E. Ciceri

  • Stimulation of the globus pallidus internus for childhood-onset dystonia.

    Giovanna Zorzi;Carlo Marras;Nardo Nardocci;Angelo Franzini

  • Overlapping phenotypes in complex spastic paraplegias SPG11, SPG15, SPG35 and SPG48

    Viviana Pensato;Barbara Castellotti;Cinzia Gellera;Davide Pareyson

  • Rasmussen’s encephalitis Early characteristics allow diagnosis

    Tiziana Granata;G. Gobbi;R. Spreafico;F. Vigevano

  • Periventricular nodular heterotopia: Classification, epileptic history, and genesis of epileptic discharges

    Giorgio Battaglia;Luisa Chiapparini;Silvana Franceschetti;Elena Freri

  • Iron‐related MRI images in patients with pantothenate kinase–associated neurodegeneration (PKAN) treated with deferiprone: Results of a phase II pilot trial

    Giovanna Zorzi;Federica Zibordi;Luisa Chiapparini;Enrico Bertini

  • Spinal radiological findings in nine patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension

    L Chiapparini;L Farina;L D'Incerti;A Erbetta

  • Spontaneous intracranial hypotension syndrome: a novel speculative physiopathological hypothesis and a novel patch method in a series of 28 consecutive patients.

    Angelo Franzini;Giuseppe Messina;Vittoria Nazzi;Eliana Mea

  • MR Findings in Leigh Syndrome with COX Deficiency and SURF-1 Mutations

    Laura Farina;Luisa Chiapparini;Graziella Uziel;Marianna Bugiani

  • Can MR imaging diagnose adult-onset Alexander disease?

    L. Farina;D. Pareyson;L. Minati;I. Ceccherini

  • Diagnosis and treatment of Chiari malformation and syringomyelia in adults: international consensus document

    Palma Ciaramitaro;Luca Massimi;Alessandro Bertuccio;Alessandra Solari

  • Spontaneous intracranial hypotension with deep brain swelling

    Mario Savoiardo;Ludovico Minati;Laura Farina;Tiziana De Simone

  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging Shows Different Topographic Involvement of the Thalamus in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Degeneration

    Alessandra Erbetta;M. L. Mandelli;M. Savoiardo;M. Grisoli

  • Response assessment in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group

    Tabitha M Cooney;Kenneth J Cohen;Carolina V Guimaraes;Girish Dhall

  • Pain processing in medication overuse headache: a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study.

    Stefania Ferraro;Licia Grazzi;Maria Luisa Mandelli;Domenico Aquino

  • Dural sinus thrombosis in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: Hypotheses on possible mechanisms.

    Mario Savoiardo;Silvia Armenise;Pantaleo Spagnolo;Tiziana De Simone

  • Headache and intracranial hypotension: neuroradiological findings.

    L. Chiapparini;E. Ciceri;S. Nappini;M. R. Castellani

  • Iatrogenic intracranial pseudoaneurysms: Neuroradiological and therapeutical considerations, including endovascular options

    E. F. M. Ciceri;C. Regna-Gladin;A. Erbetta;L. Chiapparini

Frequent Co-Authors

Tiziana Granata
Tiziana Granata Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Silvana Franceschetti
Silvana Franceschetti Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Maria Luisa Mandelli
Maria Luisa Mandelli University of California, San Francisco
Franco Taroni
Franco Taroni University of Milan
Pierangelo Veggiotti
Pierangelo Veggiotti University of Milan
Valeria Tiranti
Valeria Tiranti Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Giuseppe Lauria
Giuseppe Lauria University of Milan
Paolo Vitali
Paolo Vitali McGill University
Roberto Spreafico
Roberto Spreafico Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Flavio Villani
Flavio Villani Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in neuroscience opens doors to various interdisciplinary careers. Many students look for flexible online programs to complement or diversify their education. Specialized options such as affordable msw programs online allow you to explore social work—a field closely linked to neurodevelopment and mental health.

If you are interested in applied behavioral science, consider bcba masters programs online. Board Certified Behavior Analysts play critical roles in supporting individuals with behavioral and neurological challenges.

Accelerated education is another popular option for those eager to enter the workforce quickly. Both online social work programs and accelerated bachelor's degree psychology programs offer fast-tracked pathways to careers intersecting with neuroscience, such as counseling, clinical research, and therapy.

These online degrees can expand your expertise while providing the flexibility needed for working professionals or non-traditional students. Exploring related fields helps build a diverse and adaptable career profile in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Luisa Chiapparini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles