World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10201 9574 404 391 380 26857

Henk J. Stam publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henk J. Stam between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henk J. Stam published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2008. 2 of the 386 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2008. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 9 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 38 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1987 2025

386 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henk J. Stam: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 2
1992 3
1993 1
1994 9
1995 6
1996 6
1997 3
1998 9
1999 4
2000 10
2001 9
2002 10
2003 9
2004 18
2005 9
2006 24
2007 23
2008 38
2009 25
2010 32
2011 11
2012 14
2013 14
2014 16
2015 22
2016 8
2017 10
2018 11
2019 7
2020 8
2021 6
2022 2
2023 2
2024 0
2025 2
Total 386
Download as CSV

Henk J. Stam publications per year - data summary

  • Henk J. Stam, a Medicine scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, has 386 publications recorded across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1987 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2008, with 38 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1987, 1988, 1990 and 1993, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 39 years in the span carry no publications at all (1989 and 2024).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.4 per year counting only the 37 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 12 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1987-1999: 46 publications (3.5 per year); 2000-2012: 232 publications (17.8 per year); 2013-2025: 108 publications (8.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Henk J. Stam publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk J. Stam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 380 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 380
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Henk J. Stam publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Henk J. Stam, a Medicine scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, records 380 publications - the 34th percentile of the discipline.
  • 34% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Henk J. Stam, and about 66% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Henk J. Stam ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Henk J. Stam D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk J. Stam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Henk J. Stam D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Henk J. Stam, a Medicine scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, records 95 D-Index - the 51st percentile of the discipline.
  • 51% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Henk J. Stam, and about 49% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Henk J. Stam falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Henk J. Stam is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a notable concentration on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, psychiatry and mental health, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, neurology, and complementary and alternative medicine.

Their scholarly work covers several main topics including:

  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Cardiovascular and Exercise Physiology
  • Neonatal and Fetal Brain Pathology
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation

Henk J. Stam has contributed to a series of research articles published in various journals. Among the recent papers are:

  • Epidemiology of Cerebral Palsy in Adulthood: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Most Frequently Studied Outcomes, 2020, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Does Body Mass Index Matter?, 2021, Physical Therapy
  • Effects of a Dedicated Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Patients With Obesity on Body Weight, Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Fitness: The OPTICARE XL Randomized Controlled Trial, 2023, Physical Therapy
  • Cardiac rehabilitation designed for patients with obesity: OPTICARE XL RCT results on health-related quality of life and psychosocial well-being, 2022, Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Blood pressure in adults with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data, 2021, Journal of Hypertension

Their work has been disseminated notably in the following publication venues:

  • Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Physical Therapy
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of Hypertension

Frequent collaborations feature several coauthors including:

  • Rita J. G. van den Berg-Emons (6 publications)
  • Iris den Uijl (5 publications)
  • Madoka Sunamura (5 publications)
  • Nienke ter Hoeve (5 publications)
  • Mattie Lenzen (4 publications)

The research output of Henk J. Stam spans multiple disciplines within medicine, emphasizing interdisciplinary approaches to cardiac, neurological, and rehabilitative health. They have contributed to advancing knowledge in both clinical and epidemiological studies, with a particular interest in patient outcomes related to cardiac rehabilitation, obesity, cerebral palsy, and blood pressure management in affected populations.

Best Publications

  • Mirror Therapy Improves Hand Function in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Gunes Yavuzer;Ruud Selles;Nebahat Sezer;Serap Sütbeyaz

  • Determinants of the Sit-to-Stand Movement: A Review

    Wim G M Janssen;Hans B J Bussmann;Henk J Stam

  • Motor Recovery and Cortical Reorganization After Mirror Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial

    Marian E. Michielsen;Ruud W. Selles;Jos N. van der Geest;Martine Eckhardt

  • The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints.

    Jan M. A. Mens;Andry Vleeming;Chris J. Snijders;Henk J. Stam

  • Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy.

    Jan M. A. Mens;Andry Vleeming;Chris J. Snijders;Bart W. Koes

  • Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: The Activity Monitor

    J. B. J. Bussmann;W. L. J. Martens;J. H. M. Tulen;F. C. Schasfoort

  • ''Playstation eyetoy games'' improve upper extremity-related motor functioning in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

    Yavuzer G;Senel A;Atay Mb;Stam Hj

  • Understanding peripartum pelvic pain. Implications of a patient survey.

    Jan M. A. Mens;Andry Vleeming;Rob Stoeckart;Henk J. Stam

  • Covid-19 and Post Intensive Care Syndrome: A Call for Action.

    Henk J. Stam;Gerold Stucki;Jerome Bickenbach

  • The effects of balance training on gait late after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

    Gunes Yavuzer;Filiz Eser;Dilek Karakus;Belgin Karaoglan

  • The mechanical effect of a pelvic belt in patients with pregnancy-related pelvic pain.

    Jan M.A. Mens;Léonie Damen;Chris J. Snijders;Henk J. Stam

  • Physical capacity in wheelchair-dependent persons with a spinal cord injury: a critical review of the literature.

    J A Haisma;L H V van der Woude;H J Stam;M P Bergen

  • Validity of the active straight leg raise test for measuring disease severity in patients with posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy.

    Jan M A Mens;Andry Vleeming;Chris J Snijders;Bart W Koes

  • Determinants of functioning of adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy

    Mireille Donkervoort;Marij Roebroeck;Diana Wiegerink;Helene van der Heijden-Maessen

  • Mirror-induced visual illusion of hand movements: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Koen Matthys;Marion Smits;Jos N. Van der Geest;Aad Van der Lugt

  • A Prospective Study on Physical Activity Levels After Spinal Cord Injury During Inpatient Rehabilitation and the Year After Discharge

    Rita J. van den Berg-Emons;Johannes B. Bussmann;Janneke A. Haisma;Tebbe A. Sluis

  • The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy: an fMRI study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke

    Marian E Michielsen;Marion Smits;Gerard M Ribbers;Henk J Stam

  • Perceived barriers to and facilitators of physical activity in young adults with childhood-onset physical disabilities.

    Laurien M Buffart;Tessa Westendorp;Rita J van den Berg-Emons;Henk J Stam

  • Physical training and fatigue, fitness, and quality of life in Guillain-Barré syndrome and CIDP.

    M. P.J. Garssen;J. B.J. Bussmann;P. I.M. Schmitz;A. Zandbergen

  • Barriers to and facilitators of everyday physical activity in persons with a spinal cord injury after discharge from the rehabilitation centre

    Maaike Vissers;Rita van den Berg-Emons;Tebbe Sluis;Michael Bergen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ron T. van Domburg
Ron T. van Domburg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marcel W M Post
Marcel W M Post University Medical Center Groningen
Jos W. R. Twisk
Jos W. R. Twisk Amsterdam UMC
Jan A.N. Verhaar
Jan A.N. Verhaar Erasmus University Rotterdam
Don Poldermans
Don Poldermans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Henk C. Hoogsteden
Henk C. Hoogsteden Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eric Boersma
Eric Boersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Theo Stijnen
Theo Stijnen Leiden University Medical Center
Paul G.H. Mulder
Paul G.H. Mulder Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens the door to several related online degree options and career pathways. Aside from the traditional MD route, students can specialize in areas supporting the broader healthcare system. For those interested in nutrition and dietetics, look into the best online nutrition degree programs to kickstart a career in health promotion and dietary science.

Leadership roles in healthcare are in high demand. Prospective administrators can choose from many online healthcare administration programs, but make sure to review which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? for quality assurance and increased job options.

Nurses aiming to advance their credentials may appreciate flexible, accelerated options. Some schools offer rn to bsn online without clinicals, providing a streamlined path to leadership and higher earning potential.

For those seeking top-tier leadership roles in nursing, the dnp online programs can be completed in a reduced timeframe via online study, expanding advanced practice and administrative opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Henk J. Stam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles