World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
26857
World Ranking
10202
National Ranking
404

Henk J. Stam publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk J. Stam sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 380 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Henk J. Stam D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk J. Stam sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Henk J. Stam is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a notable concentration on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, psychiatry and mental health, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, neurology, and complementary and alternative medicine.

Their scholarly work covers several main topics including:

  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Cardiovascular and Exercise Physiology
  • Neonatal and Fetal Brain Pathology
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation

Henk J. Stam has contributed to a series of research articles published in various journals. Among the recent papers are:

  • Epidemiology of Cerebral Palsy in Adulthood: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Most Frequently Studied Outcomes, 2020, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Does Body Mass Index Matter?, 2021, Physical Therapy
  • Effects of a Dedicated Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Patients With Obesity on Body Weight, Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Fitness: The OPTICARE XL Randomized Controlled Trial, 2023, Physical Therapy
  • Cardiac rehabilitation designed for patients with obesity: OPTICARE XL RCT results on health-related quality of life and psychosocial well-being, 2022, Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Blood pressure in adults with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data, 2021, Journal of Hypertension

Their work has been disseminated notably in the following publication venues:

  • Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Physical Therapy
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of Hypertension

Frequent collaborations feature several coauthors including:

  • Rita J. G. van den Berg-Emons (6 publications)
  • Iris den Uijl (5 publications)
  • Madoka Sunamura (5 publications)
  • Nienke ter Hoeve (5 publications)
  • Mattie Lenzen (4 publications)

The research output of Henk J. Stam spans multiple disciplines within medicine, emphasizing interdisciplinary approaches to cardiac, neurological, and rehabilitative health. They have contributed to advancing knowledge in both clinical and epidemiological studies, with a particular interest in patient outcomes related to cardiac rehabilitation, obesity, cerebral palsy, and blood pressure management in affected populations.

Best Publications

  • Mirror Therapy Improves Hand Function in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Gunes Yavuzer;Ruud Selles;Nebahat Sezer;Serap Sütbeyaz

  • Determinants of the Sit-to-Stand Movement: A Review

    Wim G M Janssen;Hans B J Bussmann;Henk J Stam

  • Motor Recovery and Cortical Reorganization After Mirror Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial

    Marian E. Michielsen;Ruud W. Selles;Jos N. van der Geest;Martine Eckhardt

  • The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints.

    Jan M. A. Mens;Andry Vleeming;Chris J. Snijders;Henk J. Stam

  • Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy.

    Jan M. A. Mens;Andry Vleeming;Chris J. Snijders;Bart W. Koes

  • Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: The Activity Monitor

    J. B. J. Bussmann;W. L. J. Martens;J. H. M. Tulen;F. C. Schasfoort

  • ''Playstation eyetoy games'' improve upper extremity-related motor functioning in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

    Yavuzer G;Senel A;Atay Mb;Stam Hj

  • Understanding peripartum pelvic pain. Implications of a patient survey.

    Jan M. A. Mens;Andry Vleeming;Rob Stoeckart;Henk J. Stam

  • Covid-19 and Post Intensive Care Syndrome: A Call for Action.

    Henk J. Stam;Gerold Stucki;Jerome Bickenbach

  • The effects of balance training on gait late after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

    Gunes Yavuzer;Filiz Eser;Dilek Karakus;Belgin Karaoglan

  • The mechanical effect of a pelvic belt in patients with pregnancy-related pelvic pain.

    Jan M.A. Mens;Léonie Damen;Chris J. Snijders;Henk J. Stam

  • Physical capacity in wheelchair-dependent persons with a spinal cord injury: a critical review of the literature.

    J A Haisma;L H V van der Woude;H J Stam;M P Bergen

  • Validity of the active straight leg raise test for measuring disease severity in patients with posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy.

    Jan M A Mens;Andry Vleeming;Chris J Snijders;Bart W Koes

  • Determinants of functioning of adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy

    Mireille Donkervoort;Marij Roebroeck;Diana Wiegerink;Helene van der Heijden-Maessen

  • Mirror-induced visual illusion of hand movements: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Koen Matthys;Marion Smits;Jos N. Van der Geest;Aad Van der Lugt

  • A Prospective Study on Physical Activity Levels After Spinal Cord Injury During Inpatient Rehabilitation and the Year After Discharge

    Rita J. van den Berg-Emons;Johannes B. Bussmann;Janneke A. Haisma;Tebbe A. Sluis

  • The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy: an fMRI study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke

    Marian E Michielsen;Marion Smits;Gerard M Ribbers;Henk J Stam

  • Perceived barriers to and facilitators of physical activity in young adults with childhood-onset physical disabilities.

    Laurien M Buffart;Tessa Westendorp;Rita J van den Berg-Emons;Henk J Stam

  • Physical training and fatigue, fitness, and quality of life in Guillain-Barré syndrome and CIDP.

    M. P.J. Garssen;J. B.J. Bussmann;P. I.M. Schmitz;A. Zandbergen

  • Barriers to and facilitators of everyday physical activity in persons with a spinal cord injury after discharge from the rehabilitation centre

    Maaike Vissers;Rita van den Berg-Emons;Tebbe Sluis;Michael Bergen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ron T. van Domburg
Ron T. van Domburg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marcel W M Post
Marcel W M Post University Medical Center Groningen
Jos W. R. Twisk
Jos W. R. Twisk Amsterdam UMC
Jan A.N. Verhaar
Jan A.N. Verhaar Erasmus University Rotterdam
Don Poldermans
Don Poldermans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Henk C. Hoogsteden
Henk C. Hoogsteden Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eric Boersma
Eric Boersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Theo Stijnen
Theo Stijnen Leiden University Medical Center
Paul G.H. Mulder
Paul G.H. Mulder Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens the door to several related online degree options and career pathways. Aside from the traditional MD route, students can specialize in areas supporting the broader healthcare system. For those interested in nutrition and dietetics, look into the best online nutrition degree programs to kickstart a career in health promotion and dietary science.

Leadership roles in healthcare are in high demand. Prospective administrators can choose from many online healthcare administration programs, but make sure to review which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? for quality assurance and increased job options.

Nurses aiming to advance their credentials may appreciate flexible, accelerated options. Some schools offer rn to bsn online without clinicals, providing a streamlined path to leadership and higher earning potential.

For those seeking top-tier leadership roles in nursing, the dnp online programs can be completed in a reduced timeframe via online study, expanding advanced practice and administrative opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Henk J. Stam

Trending Scientists