World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
23961
World Ranking
15190
National Ranking
7666

Ronglih Liao publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronglih Liao sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 265 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ronglih Liao D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronglih Liao sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronglih Liao is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research primarily intersects molecular biology with cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, nephrology, physiology, and health-related toxicology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
  • Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts

Ronglih Liao has published in multiple peer-reviewed venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Circulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Circulation Research
  • JACC Heart Failure

Significant recent publications include:

  • "Outcomes in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis Undergoing Heart Transplantation" (2020), JACC Heart Failure
  • "Improved Quantification of Cardiac Amyloid Burden in Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis" (2020), JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • "Large and Small Animal Models of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction" (2022), Circulation Research
  • "Natural Compound Library Screening Identifies New Molecules for the Treatment of Cardiac Fibrosis and Diastolic Dysfunction" (2020), Circulation
  • "Modeling Secondary Iron Overload Cardiomyopathy with Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes" (2020), Cell Reports

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Sarah Cuddy
  • Rodney H. Falk
  • Marie Foley Kijewski
  • Frederick L. Ruberg
  • Sharmila Dorbala

Ronglih Liao's publications indicate a sustained focus on cardiac pathology related to amyloidosis and heart failure, as well as the application of molecular and cellular models to cardiovascular diseases. Their work integrates clinical research with advanced imaging and experimental models to address complex cardiovascular and systemic conditions.

Best Publications

  • Telomere dysfunction induces metabolic and mitochondrial compromise

    Ergiin Sahin;Simona Colla;Marc Liesa;Javid Moslehi

  • Disruption of coordinated cardiac hypertrophy and angiogenesis contributes to the transition to heart failure

    Ichiro Shiojima;Kaori Sato;Yasuhiro Izumiya;Stephan Schiekofer

  • CD31− but Not CD31+ Cardiac Side Population Cells Exhibit Functional Cardiomyogenic Differentiation

    Otmar Pfister;Frédéric Mouquet;Mohit Jain;Ross Summer

  • Ly-6Chigh Monocytes Depend on Nr4a1 to Balance both Inflammatory and Reparative Phases in the Infarcted Myocardium

    Ingo Hilgendorf;Louisa M.S. Gerhardt;Timothy C. Tan;Carla Winter

  • AL (Light-Chain) Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Review of Diagnosis and Therapy.

    Rodney H. Falk;Kevin M. Alexander;Ronglih Liao;Sharmila Dorbala

  • Human amyloidogenic light chains directly impair cardiomyocyte function through an increase in cellular oxidant stress.

    Daniel A. Brenner;Mohit Jain;David R. Pimentel;Bo Wang

  • Phenotypic Spectrum Caused by Transgenic Overexpression of Activated Akt in the Heart

    Takashi Matsui;Ling Li;Justina C. Wu;Stuart Cook

  • Cell Therapy Attenuates Deleterious Ventricular Remodeling and Improves Cardiac Performance After Myocardial Infarction

    Mohit Jain;Harout DerSimonian;Daniel A. Brenner;Soeun Ngoy

  • Guidelines for experimental models of myocardial ischemia and infarction.

    Merry L. Lindsey;Merry L. Lindsey;Roberto Bolli;John M. Canty;Xiao Jun Du

  • Evidence for Human Lung Stem Cells

    Jan Kajstura;Marcello Rota;Sean R Hall;Toru Hosoda

  • Loss of Cardiac microRNA-Mediated Regulation Leads to Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure

    Prakash K. Rao;Yumiko Toyama;H. Rosaria Chiang;Sumeet Gupta

  • mir-17-92 cluster is required for and sufficient to induce cardiomyocyte proliferation in postnatal and adult hearts.

    Jinghai Chen;Zhan Peng Huang;Hee Young Seok;Jian Ding

  • Cardiac macrophages promote diastolic dysfunction.

    Maarten Hulsmans;Hendrik B. Sager;Jason D. Roh;María Valero-Muñoz

  • Cardiac-Specific Overexpression of GLUT1 Prevents the Development of Heart Failure Attributable to Pressure Overload in Mice

    Ronglih Liao;Mohit Jain;Lei Cui;Jessica D’Agostino

  • Aldosterone impairs vascular reactivity by decreasing glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity

    Jane A Leopold;Aamir Dam;Aamir Dam;Bradley A Maron;Bradley A Maron;Bradley A Maron;Anne W Scribner;Anne W Scribner

  • Amyloidogenic light chains induce cardiomyocyte contractile dysfunction and apoptosis via a non-canonical p38α MAPK pathway

    Jianru Shi;Jian Guan;Bingbing Jiang;Daniel A. Brenner

  • Anthracyclines induce calpain-dependent titin proteolysis and necrosis in cardiomyocytes.

    Chee Chew Lim;Christian Zuppinger;Xinxin Guo;Gabriela M. Kuster

  • Infusion of Light Chains From Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis Causes Diastolic Dysfunction in Isolated Mouse Hearts

    Ronglih Liao;Mohit Jain;Paige Teller;Lawreen H. Connors

  • Restoration of Cardiac Progenitor Cells After Myocardial Infarction by Self-Proliferation and Selective Homing of Bone Marrow–Derived Stem Cells

    Frédéric Mouquet;Otmar Pfister;Mohit Jain;Angelos Oikonomopoulos

  • Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Modulates Cytosolic Redox Status and Contractile Phenotype in Adult Cardiomyocytes

    Mohit Jain;Daniel A. Brenner;Lei Cui;Chee Chew Lim

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohit Jain
Mohit Jain University of California, San Diego
Michael Bauer
Michael Bauer TU Dresden
Douglas B. Sawyer
Douglas B. Sawyer Maine Medical Center
Wilson S. Colucci
Wilson S. Colucci Boston University
Ali Khademhosseini
Ali Khademhosseini Terasaki Foundation
Roger J. Hajjar
Roger J. Hajjar Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Joseph Loscalzo
Joseph Loscalzo Harvard Medical School
David C. Seldin
David C. Seldin Boston University
Rodney H. Falk
Rodney H. Falk Brigham and Women's Hospital
Susan Cheng
Susan Cheng Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine or nursing in the USA offers diverse options for both new and experienced professionals. If you're looking to advance your nursing credentials, you may consider programs such as the rn to bsn without clinicals, which allows registered nurses to earn their BSN degree with flexible coursework and minimal on-site requirements.

For those seeking rapid advancement, options like lpn accelerated program or accelerated msn to dnp programs make it possible to move quickly into higher nursing roles. These fast-track programs are designed for motivated learners ready to take on more responsibility in clinical leadership or advanced practice.

Cost can also be a significant factor. Exploring cheapest dnp programs is a practical way to manage expenses while earning a top-tier credential. Whether you are starting as an LPN, upgrading to a BSN, or aiming for a DNP, online study in the USA offers flexible, reputable, and efficient pathways to advance your medical career.

Best Scientists Citing Ronglih Liao

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles