World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
11558
World Ranking
6332
National Ranking
3434

Jennifer K. Bosson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer K. Bosson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jennifer K. Bosson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer K. Bosson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jennifer K. Bosson is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with specific focus on gender studies, sociology and political science, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and demography.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics that include social and intergroup psychology, gender roles and identity studies, gender diversity and inequality, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, work-family balance challenges, LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, as well as cultural differences and values.

Frequent publication venues for Bosson's research include Social Psychological and Personality Science, Archives of Sexual Behavior, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, and the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.

Among notable recent publications are:

  • "Psychometric Properties and Correlates of Precarious Manhood Beliefs in 62 Nations" (2021, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology)
  • "Country-level and individual-level predictors of men's support for gender equality in 42 countries" (2020, European Journal of Social Psychology)
  • "Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations" (2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science)
  • "Gendered Self-Views Across 62 Countries: A Test of Competing Models" (2022, Social Psychological and Personality Science)
  • "Harder Won and Easier Lost? Testing the Double Standard in Gender Rules in 62 Countries" (2022, Sex Roles)

Bosson has collaborated extensively with several researchers, including Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka, Joseph A. Vandello, Paweł Jurek, Tomasz Besta, and Deborah L. Best.

Their research contributions reflect an interdisciplinary approach bridging social sciences and psychology, with significant attention to gender and identity issues across diverse cultural contexts. The scientist has contributed to the understanding of gender norms, equality attitudes, and social psychological dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as large-scale cross-national studies encompassing multiple countries.

Best Publications

  • Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: the blind men and the elephant revisited?

    Jennifer K. Bosson;William B. Swann Jr.;James W. Pennebaker

  • Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood.

    Joseph A. Vandello;Jennifer K. Bosson

  • Precarious manhood.

    Unknown

  • Self-Enhancement Tendencies Among People With High Explicit Self-Esteem: The Moderating Role of Implicit Self-Esteem

    Jennifer K. Bosson;Ryan P. Brown;Virgil Zeigler-Hill;William B. Swann Jr.

  • When saying and doing diverge: The effects of stereotype threat on self-reported versus non-verbal anxiety☆

    Jennifer K Bosson;Ethan L Haymovitz;Elizabeth C Pinel

  • Precarious Manhood and Displays of Physical Aggression

    Jennifer K. Bosson;Joseph A. Vandello;Rochelle Milne Burnaford;Jonathan M. Weaver

  • Untangling the links between narcissism and self‐esteem: A theoretical and empirical review.

    Jennifer K. Bosson;Chad E. Lakey;W. Keith Campbell;Virgil Zeigler-Hill

  • Precarious Manhood and Its Links to Action and Aggression

    Jennifer K. Bosson;Joseph A. Vandello

  • When Equal Isn't Really Equal: The Masculine Dilemma of Seeking Work Flexibility

    Joseph A. Vandello;Vanessa E. Hettinger;Jennifer K. Bosson;Jasmine Siddiqi

  • Do Narcissists Dislike Themselves “Deep Down Inside”?

    W. Keith Campbell;Jennifer K. Bosson;Thomas W. Goheen;Chad E. Lakey

  • Role rigidity: a problem of identity misclassification?

    Jennifer K. Bosson;Jennifer L. Prewitt-Freilino;Jennifer N. Taylor

  • Third Places and the Social Life of Streets

    Vikas Mehta;Jennifer K. Bosson

  • Identity Negotiation at Work

    William B. Swann;Russell E. Johnson;Jennifer K. Bosson

  • Identity negotiation: A theory of self and social interaction

    William B. Swann Jr.;Jennifer K. Bosson

  • Interpersonal chemistry through negativity: Bonding by sharing negative attitudes about others

    Jennifer K. Bosson;Amber B. Johnson;Kate Niederhoffer;William B. Swann Jr.

  • Attachment-Style Differences in Attitudes toward and Reactions to Feedback from Romantic Partners: An Exploration of the Relational Bases of Self-Esteem

    Kelly A. Brennan;Jennifer K. Bosson

  • Gender role violations and identity misclassification: The roles of audience and actor variables.

    Jennifer K. Bosson;Jenel N. Taylor;Jennifer L. Prewitt-Freilino

  • Different Partners, Different Selves: Strategic Verification of Circumscribed Identities

    William B. Swann;Jennifer K. Bosson;Brett W. Pelham

  • Hostile and Benevolent Sexism and College Women’s STEM Outcomes:

    Sophie L. Kuchynka;Kristen Salomon;Jennifer K. Bosson;Mona El-Hout

  • Gender dichotomization at the level of ingroup identity: What it is, and why men use it more than women.

    Jennifer K. Bosson;Kenneth S. Michniewicz

  • Romantic involvement, self‐discrepancy, and psychological well‐being: A preliminary investigation

    W. Keith Campbell;Constantine Sedikides;Jennifer K. Bosson

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph A. Vandello
Joseph A. Vandello University of South Florida
William B. Swann
William B. Swann The University of Texas at Austin
W. Keith Campbell
W. Keith Campbell University of Georgia
Michael H. Kernis
Michael H. Kernis University of Georgia
J. Kevin Thompson
J. Kevin Thompson University of South Florida
Suzanne C. Swan
Suzanne C. Swan University of South Carolina
Vincent Yzerbyt
Vincent Yzerbyt Université Catholique de Louvain
Ángel Gómez
Ángel Gómez National University of Distance Education
Michelle K. Ryan
Michelle K. Ryan University of Exeter
Dominic J. Parrott
Dominic J. Parrott Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options and unique career paths, especially for those interested in counseling and therapy. One of the most in-demand roles is that of a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Requirements to become an MFT can vary significantly by location, so it’s crucial to understand the steps for your specific area.

For example, if you are considering starting your practice in Missouri, learn more about mft requirements in Kansas City. In Texas, those interested in the field should pay special attention to mft requirements in Laredo.

The path to licensure may involve earning a relevant online psychology degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing licensing exams. For those heading to Nevada, be sure to explore Las Vegas mft certification requirements. Interested applicants in Kentucky can follow the steps outlined in how to become an mft in Lexington.

With the flexibility of online degrees and careful planning, you can build a pathway toward a meaningful career in mental health and counseling, no matter where you want to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer K. Bosson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles