World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
21473
World Ranking
4621
National Ranking
318

Katja Frieler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katja Frieler sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 155 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Katja Frieler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katja Frieler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katja Frieler is a researcher affiliated with the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. Their work primarily focuses on environmental science, with particular emphasis on global and planetary change. The scientist's contributions span various subfields, including atmospheric science, sociology and political science, oceanography, and soil science.

Their research topics cover several key areas such as flood risk assessment and management, tropical and extratropical cyclones research, climate variability and models, disaster management and resilience, hydrology and watershed management studies, hydrology and drought analysis, and atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics.

Frieler has co-authored extensively with several researchers, including Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, Christian Otto, Stefan Lange, and Christopher Reyer, reflecting significant collaborative engagement in the climate impacts domain.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • "Intergenerational inequities in exposure to climate extremes" (2021, Science)
  • "Projecting Exposure to Extreme Climate Impact Events Across Six Event Categories and Three Spatial Scales" (2020, Earth s Future)
  • "ATTRICI v1.1 - counterfactual climate for impact attribution" (2021, Geoscientific model development)
  • "A framework for ensemble modelling of climate change impacts on lakes worldwide: the ISIMIP Lake Sector" (2022, Geoscientific model development)
  • "Contribution of climate change to the spatial expansion of West Nile virus in Europe" (2024, Nature Communications)

Katja Frieler frequently publishes in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Nature Communications, Geoscientific model development, Environmental Research Letters, and Earth system science data.

Best Publications

  • Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C

    Malte Meinshausen;Nicolai Meinshausen;William Hare;Sarah C. B. Raper

  • Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change

    Jacob Schewe;Jens Heinke;Jens Heinke;Dieter Gerten;Ingjerd Haddeland

  • The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP): project framework.

    Lila Warszawski;Katja Frieler;Veronika Huber;Franziska Piontek

  • A trend-preserving bias correction – The ISI-MIP approach

    S. Hempel;K. Frieler;L. Warszawski;J. Schewe

  • Constraints and potentials of future irrigation water availability on agricultural production under climate change

    Joshua Elliott;Delphine Deryng;Christoph Müller;Katja Frieler

  • Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal

    Carl Friedrich Schleussner;Joeri Rogelj;Joeri Rogelj;Michiel Schaeffer;Tabea Lissner

  • The effects of climate extremes on global agricultural yields

    Elisabeth Vogel;Markus G. Donat;Markus G. Donat;Lisa Victoria Alexander;Malte Meinshausen;Malte Meinshausen

  • Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global warming: the case of 1.5 °C and 2 °C

    Carl-Friedrich Schleussner;Tabea Katharina Lissner;Erich M. Fischer;Jan Wohland

  • Increased human and economic losses from river flooding with anthropogenic warming

    Francesco Dottori;Wojciech Szewczyk;Juan Carlos Ciscar;Fang Zhao

  • Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming - simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b)

    Katja Frieler;Stefan Lange;Franziska Piontek;Christopher P. O. Reyer

  • Limiting global warming to 2 °C is unlikely to save most coral reefs

    K. Frieler;M. Meinshausen;M. Meinshausen;A. Golly;M. Mengel

  • Consistent negative response of US crops to high temperatures in observations and crop models

    Bernhard Schauberger;Sotirios Archontoulis;Almut Arneth;Juraj Balkovic

  • Increased record-breaking precipitation events under global warming

    Jascha Lehmann;Jascha Lehmann;Dim Coumou;Katja Frieler

  • Intergenerational inequities in exposure to climate extremes

    Wim Thiery;Stefan Lange;Joeri Rogelj;Carl Friedrich Schleussner

  • State-of-the-art global models underestimate impacts from climate extremes

    Jacob Schewe;Simon N. Gosling;Christopher Reyer;Fang Zhao

  • Future sea level rise constrained by observations and long-term commitment

    Matthias Mengel;Matthias Mengel;Anders Levermann;Anders Levermann;Anders Levermann;Katja Frieler;Alexander James Robinson;Alexander James Robinson

  • Estimating the near-surface permafrost-carbon feedback on global warming

    T. Schneider von Deimling;M. Meinshausen;M. Meinshausen;A. Levermann;A. Levermann;V. Huber

  • Consistent increase in Indian monsoon rainfall and its variability across CMIP-5 models

    A. Menon;A. Menon;A. Levermann;A. Levermann;J. Schewe;J. Lehmann;J. Lehmann

  • Turn down the heat : Why a 4°c warmer world must be avoided

    H.J. Schellnhuber;W. Hare;O. Serdeczny;S. Adams

  • Multisectoral climate impact hotspots in a warming world

    Franziska Piontek;Christoph Müller;Thomas A.M. Pugh;Douglas B. Clark

  • Turn down the heat: climate extremes, regional impacts, and the case for resilience.

    H. J. Schellnhuber;B. Hare;O. Serdeczny;M. Schaeffer

Frequent Co-Authors

Anders Levermann
Anders Levermann Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Malte Meinshausen
Malte Meinshausen University of Melbourne
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
Hans Joachim Schellnhuber Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Markus Rex
Markus Rex Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Joshua Elliott
Joshua Elliott University of Chicago
Dim Coumou
Dim Coumou Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Simon N. Gosling
Simon N. Gosling University of Nottingham
Ricarda Winkelmann
Ricarda Winkelmann University of Potsdam
Michiel Schaeffer
Michiel Schaeffer Wageningen University & Research
Christian Folberth
Christian Folberth International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens diverse career routes across research, policy, and management. Many students seek flexible online options that complement their schedules without compromising quality. For those interested in broadening their perspective, accredited online bachelors in sociology programs provide valuable insights into human-environment interactions and social dynamics shaping ecological policies.

Graduate-level education offers further specialization, and some professionals seek programs that fit around their careers. Online doctoral programs online no dissertation requirements are becoming more popular, allowing candidates to focus on applied research and professional skills rather than extensive dissertations. This flexibility makes it easier to advance without putting life on hold.

For educators aiming to impact environmental education, transitioning through the best eds to edd programs online can enhance leadership and instructional expertise. These pathways often bridge the gap between master's-level education and doctoral leadership roles in academic or community settings.

Additionally, for those inclined towards social work in environmental justice or community health, the cheapest dsw program options online offer affordable routes to advanced practice. These degrees bolster the ability to advocate for sustainable practices within vulnerable populations and promote holistic environmental well-being.

Exploring these related online degree options can expand career possibilities while maintaining a commitment to environmental stewardship.

accredited online bachelors in sociology
doctoral programs online no dissertation
best eds to edd programs
cheapest dsw program

Best Scientists Citing Katja Frieler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles