World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
20470
World Ranking
2803
National Ranking
1620

Daniel W. King publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel W. King sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 163 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel W. King D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel W. King sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel W. King is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. This association situates them within an academic environment known for its diverse research activities and scholarly output.

There is no available data on recent papers published by Daniel W. King, nor are there records of frequent co-authors, book publications, or recognized awards. Similarly, specific fields of study, subfields, and main research topics related to their work have not been documented in the accessible sources.

Without publications or detailed research areas on record, it is not possible to provide further specifics regarding their academic contributions, collaborations, or areas of focus.

Best Publications

  • Relationships of Job and Family Involvement, Family Social Support, and Work–Family Conflict with Job and Life Satisfaction

    Gary A. Adams;Lynda A. King;Daniel W. King

  • Resilience-recovery factors in post-traumatic stress disorder among female and male Vietnam veterans: hardiness, postwar social support, and additional stressful life events.

    Lynda A. King;Daniel W. King;John A. Fairbank;Terence M. Keane

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale: Evidence for the Dimensionality of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

    Daniel W. King;Gregory A. Leskin;Lynda A. King;Frank W. Weathers

  • Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory: A Collection of Measures for Studying Deployment-Related Experiences of Military Personnel and Veterans

    Lynda A. King;Daniel W. King;Dawne S. Vogt;Jeffrey Knight

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder in a national sample of female and male Vietnam veterans: risk factors, war-zone stressors, and resilience-recovery variables.

    Daniel W. King;Linda A. King;David W. Foy;Terence M. Keane

  • Exposure to Hurricane-Related Stressors and Mental Illness After Hurricane Katrina

    Sandro Galea;Chris R. Brewin;Michael Gruber;Russell T. Jones

  • Focus groups in psychological assessment: enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population.

    Dawne S. Vogt;Daniel W. King;Lynda A. King

  • Male war-zone veterans' perceived relationships with their children: the importance of emotional numbing.

    Ayelet Meron Ruscio;Frank W. Weathers;Lynda A. King;Lynda A. King;Daniel W. King;Daniel W. King

  • Relationship Between Acute Morphine and the Course of PTSD in Children With Burns

    Glenn Saxe;Frederick Stoddard;Diane Courtney;Kelly Cunningham

  • Validation of Scales From the Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory in a Sample of Operation Iraqi Freedom Veterans

    Dawne S. Vogt;Susan P. Proctor;Daniel W. King;Lynda A. King

  • Deployment stressors, gender, and mental health outcomes among Gulf War I veterans.

    Dawne S. Vogt;Anica P. Pless;Lynda A. King;Lynda A. King;Daniel W. King;Daniel W. King

  • Deployment risk and resilience inventory-2 (DRRI-2): an updated tool for assessing psychosocial risk and resilience factors among service members and veterans.

    Dawne Vogt;Dawne Vogt;Brian N. Smith;Brian N. Smith;Lynda A. King;Lynda A. King;Daniel W. King;Daniel W. King

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, physiological reactivity, alcohol problems, and aggression among military veterans.

    Casey T. Taft;Danny G. Kaloupek;Jeremiah A. Schumm;Amy D. Marshall

  • Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity: A Critical Assessment of Construct Validity

    Lynda A. King;Daniel W. King

  • Course and predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder among Gulf War veterans: a prospective analysis.

    Jessica Wolfe;Darin J. Erickson;Erica J. Sharkansky;Daniel W. King

  • Alternative Representations of War Zone Stressors: Relationships to Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Male and Female Vietnam Veterans.

    Daniel W. King;Lynda A. King;David M. Gudanowski;Dawn L. Vreven

  • PTSD Symptom Increases in Iraq-Deployed Soldiers: Comparison With Nondeployed Soldiers and Associations With Baseline Symptoms, Deployment Experiences, and Postdeployment Stress

    Jennifer J. Vasterling;Susan P. Proctor;Matthew J. Friedman;Charles W. Hoge

  • Prewar Factors in Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Structural Equation Modeling with a National Sample of Female and Male Vietnam Veterans.

    Daniel W. King;Lynda A. King;David W. Foy;David M. Gudanowski

  • Directionality of the Association Between Social Support and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Longitudinal Investigation

    Daniel W. King;Casey Taft;Lynda A. King;Charity Hammond

  • Process and treatment adherence factors in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner violent men.

    Casey T. Taft;Christopher M. Murphy;Daniel W. King;Peter H. Musser

Frequent Co-Authors

Dawne Vogt
Dawne Vogt Boston University
Casey T. Taft
Casey T. Taft Boston University
Avron Spiro
Avron Spiro Boston University
Brett T. Litz
Brett T. Litz Boston University
Jennifer J. Vasterling
Jennifer J. Vasterling Boston University
Jillian C. Shipherd
Jillian C. Shipherd Boston University
Jessica Wolfe
Jessica Wolfe Boston University
Crystal L. Park
Crystal L. Park University of Connecticut
Michael K. Suvak
Michael K. Suvak Suffolk University
Terence M. Keane
Terence M. Keane Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology studies in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and professional avenues. Many students seek apa accredited online psyd programs to ensure a quality education and eligibility for licensure. Accreditation is critical, so researching program credentials is essential for long-term career growth.

For those interested in behavioral therapy or clinical interventions, consider aba doctorate programs. These specializations prepare graduates to work with diverse populations, focusing on evidence-based solutions for behavior change and support.

Psychology is also highly valued in organizational settings. Wondering what can you do with a psychology degree in business? Skills in psychology can lead to roles in human resources, management, consulting, or marketing, blending mental health insights with strategic decision-making.

Affordability remains a concern for many learners. Prospective students looking to balance cost and quality should explore cheap psyd online programs accredited. These programs make advanced education more accessible while upholding professional standards.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel W. King

Trending Scientists