World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
48
Citations
9635
World Ranking
4199
National Ranking
462

Zoe G. Davies publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoe G. Davies sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 112 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Zoe G. Davies D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoe G. Davies sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Zoe G. Davies is affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their research primarily focuses on topics related to urban green spaces, conservation, biodiversity, and ecosystem services.

Their most recent publication record includes papers published between 2020 and 2023, addressing various environmental and ecological themes. Selected works include:

  • Perceived biodiversity, sound, naturalness and safety enhance the restorative quality and wellbeing benefits of green and blue space in a neotropical city (2020) - The Science of The Total Environment
  • What motivates the masses: Understanding why people contribute to conservation citizen science projects (2020) - Biological Conservation
  • A global horizon scan of the future impacts of robotics and autonomous systems on urban ecosystems (2021) - Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Meeting sustainable development goals via robotics and autonomous systems (2022) - Nature Communications
  • How do different types and characteristics of green space impact mental health? A scoping review (2023) - People and Nature

Their frequent co-authors highlight a collaborative approach within the academic community. Key collaborators include:

  • Martin Dallimer
  • Katherine N. Irvine
  • Matthew J. Struebig
  • Jessica C. Fisher
  • Jake E. Bicknell

Davies publishes in a range of scientific journals, with multiple contributions to:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • People and Nature
  • Conservation Letters
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Biological Conservation

Their scholarly output covers several subfields, notably:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Social Psychology

Main research topics of Davies include:

  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Their publication record includes 99 papers categorized under Environmental Science, reflecting a sustained focus on this field. This interdisciplinary focus integrates ecological, social, and technological perspectives relevant to sustainability challenges and human wellbeing.

Best Publications

  • Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins

    Chris D. Thomas;E.J. Bodsworth;Robert J. Wilson;A.D. Simmons

  • Biodiversity and the Feel-Good Factor: Understanding Associations between Self-Reported Human Well-being and Species Richness

    Martin Dallimer;Martin Dallimer;Katherine N. Irvine;Andrew M. J. Skinner;Zoe G. Davies

  • Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above‐ground carbon storage at a city‐wide scale

    Zoe G. Davies;Zoe G. Davies;Jill L. Edmondson;Andreas Heinemeyer;Jonathan R. Leake

  • A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens

    Zoe G. Davies;Richard A. Fuller;Alison Loram;Katherine N. Irvine

  • Are hedgerows effective corridors between fragments of woodland habitat? An evidence-based approach

    Zoe G. Davies;Andrew S. Pullin

  • Organic carbon hidden in urban ecosystems

    Jill L. Edmondson;Zoe G. Davies;Nicola McHugh;Kevin J. Gaston

  • Temporal changes in greenspace in a highly urbanized region

    Martin Dallimer;Zhiyao Tang;Zhiyao Tang;Peter R. Bibby;Paul J Brindley

  • Understanding biodiversity-ecosystem service relationships in urban areas: A comprehensive literature review

    Nina Schwarz;Nina Schwarz;Marco Moretti;Miguel N. Bugalho;Miguel N. Bugalho;Zoe G. Davies

  • Changing habitat associations of a thermally constrained species, the silver-spotted skipper butterfly, in response to climate warming.

    Zoe G. Davies;Robert J. Wilson;Sophie Coles;Chris D. Thomas

  • Land-cover effects on soil organic carbon stocks in a European city

    Jill L. Edmondson;Zoe G. Davies;Sarah A. McCormack;Kevin J. Gaston

  • Soil surface temperatures reveal moderation of the urban heat island effect by trees and shrubs.

    Jill L Edmondson;Iain Stott;Zoe G Davies;Kevin J Gaston

  • Perceived biodiversity, sound, naturalness and safety enhance the restorative quality and wellbeing benefits of green and blue space in a neotropical city

    Jessica Claris Fisher;Katherine Nesbitt Irvine;Jake Emmerson Bicknell;William Michael Hayes

  • Are current management recommendations for saproxylic invertebrates effective? A systematic review

    Zoe G. Davies;Zoe G. Davies;Claire Tyler;Gavin B. Stewart;Gavin B. Stewart;Andrew S. Pullin;Andrew S. Pullin

  • Urban cultivation in allotments maintains soil qualities adversely affected by conventional agriculture.

    Jill L. Edmondson;Zoe G. Davies;Kevin J. Gaston;Jonathan R. Leake

  • Quantifying the impacts of defaunation on natural forest regeneration in a global meta-analysis.

    Charlie J. Gardner;Jake E. Bicknell;William Baldwin-Cantello;Matthew J. Struebig

  • Improved timber harvest techniques maintain biodiversity in tropical forests

    Jake E. Bicknell;Matthew J. Struebig;David P. Edwards;Zoe G. Davies

  • Management costs for small protected areas and economies of scale in habitat conservation

    Paul R. Armsworth;Paul R. Armsworth;Lisette Cantú-Salazar;Mark Parnell;Zoe G. Davies

  • Unpacking the People–Biodiversity Paradox: A Conceptual Framework

    Tristan J. Pett;Assaf Shwartz;Katherine N. Irvine;Martin Dallimer

  • What Personal and Environmental Factors Determine Frequency of Urban Greenspace Use

    Martin Dallimer;Zoe G. Davies;Katherine N. Irvine;Lorraine L. Maltby

  • Wetlands for wellbeing: piloting a nature-based health intervention for the management of anxiety and depression

    Phoebe R. Maund;Phoebe R. Maund;Katherine N. Irvine;Jonathan Reeves;Emily Strong

  • The re-expansion and improving status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain: a metapopulation success story

    Zoe G. Davies;Robert J. Wilson;Tom M. Brereton;Chris D. Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin J. Gaston
Kevin J. Gaston University of Exeter
Matthew J. Struebig
Matthew J. Struebig University of Kent
Martin Dallimer
Martin Dallimer University of Leeds
Paul R. Armsworth
Paul R. Armsworth University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Jonathan R. Leake
Jonathan R. Leake University of Sheffield
Chris D. Thomas
Chris D. Thomas University of York
Robert J. Wilson
Robert J. Wilson University of St Andrews
Robert J. Smith
Robert J. Smith University of Kent
Andrew S. Pullin
Andrew S. Pullin Bangor University
Henry Bernard
Henry Bernard Universiti of Malaysia Sabah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open new doors for those interested in Ecology and Evolution. With the rise of flexible education, many students consider advancing their careers through online programs that connect closely to health and environmental sciences. For example, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online can provide pathways for career shifters seeking quick entry into healthcare, often with interdisciplinary environmental overlaps.

Choosing the right online program matters. Comparing program formats such as capella vs wgu rn to bsn helps you evaluate cost, flexibility, and accreditation—crucial for roles where sciences and health converge. For those already holding certain degrees, online bsn to msn programs offer clear, affordable bridges into advanced roles, supporting career growth and specialization.

Always ensure your chosen institution is reputable. Opting for non profit colleges can help guarantee academic quality and recognition, which are essential for future job prospects, research opportunities, or graduate studies in Ecology, Evolution, and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Zoe G. Davies

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles