World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dariusz Chruściński

Dariusz Chruściński

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
36
Citations
6152
World Ranking
2625
National Ranking
15

Dariusz Chruściński publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dariusz Chruściński sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 202 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Dariusz Chruściński D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dariusz Chruściński sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dariusz Chruściński is affiliated with Nicolaus Copernicus University in Poland. Their research spans several fields including Computer Science, Physics and Astronomy, and Mathematics, with a focus on various specialized subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mathematical Physics, and Algebra and Number Theory.

The primary topics of their scientific work include Quantum Information and Cryptography, Quantum Mechanics and Applications, Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture, Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies, Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, Advanced Topics in Algebra, and Matrix Theory and Algorithms.

Among the recent papers attributed to Dariusz Chruściński are:

  • "Dynamical maps beyond Markovian regime" (2022), published in Physics Reports
  • "Random generators of Markovian evolution: A quantum-classical transition by superdecoherence" (2021), published in Physical review. E
  • "Family of multipartite separability criteria based on a correlation tensor" (2020), published in Physical review. A/Physical review, A
  • "Mirrored entanglement witnesses" (2020), published in npj Quantum Information
  • "Probability representation of quantum dynamics using pseudostochastic maps" (2020), published in Physical review. A/Physical review, A

Frequent collaborators contributing to the body of research alongside Dariusz Chruściński include:

  • Anindita Bera
  • Gen Kimura
  • Gniewomir Sarbicki
  • Davide Lonigro
  • Hiromichi Ohno

The venues where Dariusz Chruściński most frequently publishes include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Physical review. A/Physical review, A
  • Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical
  • Scientific Reports
  • Open Systems & Information Dynamics

The research career of Dariusz Chruściński is characterized by sustained contributions to multiple interconnected disciplines in science, often intersecting quantum theory and computational methods.

Best Publications

  • Degree of non-Markovianity of quantum evolution.

    Dariusz Chruściński;Sabrina Maniscalco

  • Non-Markovianity and reservoir memory of quantum channels: a quantum information theory perspective

    B. Bylicka;D. Chruściński;S. Maniscalco

  • Geometric Phases in Classical and Quantum Mechanics

    Dariusz Chruściński;Andrzej Jamiołkowski

  • Measures of non-Markovianity: Divisibility versus backflow of information

    Dariusz Chruściński;Andrzej Kossakowski;Ángel Rivas;Ángel Rivas

  • Non-Markovian quantum dynamics: local versus nonlocal.

    Dariusz Chruściński;Andrzej Kossakowski

  • A Brief History of the GKLS Equation

    Dariusz Chruściński;Saverio Pascazio

  • Entanglement witnesses: construction, analysis and classification

    Dariusz Chruściński;Gniewomir Sarbicki

  • Comparative study of non-Markovianity measures in exactly solvable one- and two-qubit models

    Carole Addis;Bogna Bylicka;Dariusz Chruściński;Sabrina Maniscalco

  • Universal Spectra of Random Lindblad Operators.

    Sergey Denisov;Tetyana Laptyeva;Wojciech Tarnowski;Dariusz Chruściński

  • Non-Markovian random unitary qubit dynamics

    Dariusz Chruściński;Filip A. Wudarski

  • On the Structure of Entanglement Witnesses and New Class of Positive Indecomposable Maps

    Dariusz Chruściński;Andrzej Kossakowski

  • Non-Markovianity degree for random unitary evolution

    Dariusz Chruściński;Filip A. Wudarski

  • Spectral Conditions for Positive Maps

    Dariusz Chruściński;Andrzej Kossakowski

  • Eternal non-Markovianity: from random unitary to Markov chain realisations.

    Nina Megier;Dariusz Chruściński;Jyrki Piilo;Walter T. Strunz

  • Detecting Non-Markovianity of Quantum Evolution via Spectra of Dynamical Maps.

    Dariusz Chruściński;Chiara Macchiavello;Sabrina Maniscalco;Sabrina Maniscalco

  • Long-time memory in non-Markovian evolutions

    Dariusz Chruściński;Andrzej Kossakowski;Saverio Pascazio

  • Sufficient conditions for a memory-kernel master equation

    Dariusz Chruściński;Andrzej Kossakowski

  • Markovianity criteria for quantum evolution

    Dariusz Chruściński;Andrzej Kossakowski

  • Divisibility and Information Flow Notions of Quantum Markovianity for Noninvertible Dynamical Maps.

    Dariusz Chruściński;Ángel Rivas;Ángel Rivas;Erling Størmer

  • Circulant states with positive partial transpose

    Dariusz Chruściński;Andrzej Kossakowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Giuseppe Marmo
Giuseppe Marmo University of Naples Federico II
Masanori Ohya
Masanori Ohya Tokyo University of Science
Karol Życzkowski
Karol Życzkowski Jagiellonian University
Chiara Macchiavello
Chiara Macchiavello University of Pavia
Luigi Accardi
Luigi Accardi University of Rome Tor Vergata
E. C. G. Sudarshan
E. C. G. Sudarshan The University of Texas at Austin
Maciej Lewenstein
Maciej Lewenstein Institute of Photonic Sciences
Erling Størmer
Erling Størmer University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring complementary online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many graduates consider pursuing advanced business degrees to enhance their analytical and leadership skills. For those interested, programs like the easiest MBA to get into offer accessible entry points without compromising quality.

Additionally, professionals seeking a quicker route to career advancement might explore the easiest and fastest online MBA programs. These programs balance pace and comprehensive learning, ideal for those working alongside their studies.

For those inclined toward leadership roles in business administration, a specialized degree such as the 1 year DBA program online provides an intensive, practical path to doctoral credentials without lengthy time commitments.

Finance is another strong avenue where math skills shine. Pursuing an online masters in finance programs can equip graduates with financial modeling and risk management knowledge, expanding their potential career sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Dariusz Chruściński

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles