World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
José Manuel García-Aznar

José Manuel García-Aznar

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
45
Citations
6800
World Ranking
5589
National Ranking
132

José Manuel García-Aznar publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José Manuel García-Aznar sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 134 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 117 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 59 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 205 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

José Manuel García-Aznar D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José Manuel García-Aznar sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 128 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 349 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 425 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 94 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 24 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission.

    Raimon Sunyer;Vito Conte;Jorge Escribano;Alberto Elosegui-Artola

  • Force loading explains spatial sensing of ligands by cells

    Roger Oria;Tina Wiegand;Tina Wiegand;Jorge Escribano;Alberto Elosegui-Artola

  • Influence of fracture gap size on the pattern of long bone healing: a computational study.

    M.J. Gómez-Benito;J.M. García-Aznar;J.H. Kuiper;M. Doblaré

  • On scaffold designing for bone regeneration: A computational multiscale approach.

    J A Sanz-Herrera;J M García-Aznar;M Doblaré

  • A bone remodelling model coupling microdamage growth and repair by 3D BMU-activity

    J. M. García-Aznar;T. Rueberg;M. Doblare

  • Computational simulation of fracture healing: Influence of interfragmentary movement on the callus growth

    J.M. García-Aznar;J.H. Kuiper;M.J. Gómez-Benito;M. Doblaré

  • Permeability evaluation of 45S5 Bioglass-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

    Ignacio Ochoa;José A. Sanz-Herrera;José M. García-Aznar;Manuel Doblaré

  • Characterization of three-dimensional cancer cell migration in mixed collagen-Matrigel scaffolds using microfluidics and image analysis.

    María Anguiano;Carlos Castilla;Martin Maška;Cristina Ederra

  • Characterization of Fibrin and Collagen Gels for Engineering Wound Healing Models

    Oihana Moreno-Arotzena;Johann G. Meier;Cristina del Amo;José Manuel García-Aznar

  • Modeling mechanosensing and its effect on the migration and proliferation of adherent cells.

    Pedro Moreo;José Manuel García-Aznar;Manuel Doblaré

  • Numerical estimation of bone density and elastic constants distribution in a human mandible

    J.M. Reina;J.M. García-Aznar;J. Domínguez;M. Doblaré

  • On the effect of substrate curvature on cell mechanics

    José A. Sanz-Herrera;José A. Sanz-Herrera;Pedro Moreo;José M. García-Aznar;Manuel Doblaré

  • A mathematical model for bone tissue regeneration inside a specific type of scaffold.

    J. A. Sanz-Herrera;J. M. Garcia-Aznar;M. Doblare

  • Numerical modeling of a mechano-chemical theory for wound contraction analysis

    E. Javierre;P. Moreo;M. Doblaré;J.M. García-Aznar

  • Mechano-sensing and cell migration: a 3D model approach

    C Borau;C Borau;R D Kamm;J M García-Aznar

  • Load transfer mechanism for different metatarsal geometries: a finite element study.

    J. M. García-Aznar;J. Bayod;A. Rosas;R. Larrainzar

  • Combined experimental and computational characterization of crosslinked collagen-based hydrogels.

    Clara Valero;Hippolyte Amaveda;Mario Mora;Jose Manuel García-Aznar

  • Appearance and location of secondary ossification centres may be explained by a reaction-diffusion mechanism

    D. A. Garzón-Alvarado;J. M. García-Aznar;M. Doblaré

  • Dynamic mechanisms of cell rigidity sensing: insights from a computational model of actomyosin networks.

    Carlos Borau;Taeyoon Kim;Tamara Bidone;José Manuel García-Aznar

  • Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 1: Mathematical model.

    Pedro Moreo;José Manuel García-Aznar;Manuel Doblaré

  • Micro–macro numerical modelling of bone regeneration in tissue engineering

    J.A. Sanz-Herrera;J.M. García-Aznar;M. Doblaré

  • Polymer scaffolds with interconnected spherical pores and controlled architecture for tissue engineering: Fabrication, mechanical properties, and finite element modeling

    Raúl Brígido Diego;Jorge Más Estellés;José Antonio Sanz;José Manuel García-Aznar

  • A reaction–diffusion model for long bones growth

    Diego Alexander Garzón-Alvarado;Diego Alexander Garzón-Alvarado;J M Garcia-Aznar;M Doblare

  • Finite Element Prediction of Proximal Femoral Fracture Patterns Under Different Loads

    M. J. Gómez-Benito;J. M. Garcı́a-Aznar;M. Doblaré

Frequent Co-Authors

Manuel Doblaré
Manuel Doblaré University of Zaragoza
Andreas Menzel
Andreas Menzel TU Dortmund University
Vivek B. Shenoy
Vivek B. Shenoy University of Pennsylvania
Nico Verdonschot
Nico Verdonschot Radboud University
Ben Fabry
Ben Fabry University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Matthew D. Welch
Matthew D. Welch University of California, Berkeley
Miguel Vicente-Manzanares
Miguel Vicente-Manzanares University of Salamanca
Julie A. Theriot
Julie A. Theriot University of Washington
S. van der Zwaag
S. van der Zwaag Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens the door to a wide variety of related online degrees and fast-track career pathways. Many students today seek flexible options to quickly gain skills and credentials. Fortunately, there are 4-6 week certification programs available, offering pathways for quick upskilling and rapid entry to technical roles.

For those interested in combining technology with business skills, you might consider accelerated finance degree programs. These programs are designed to help students develop strong financial acumen alongside an understanding of engineering and tech principles.

If your goals include leadership positions, pursuing accelerated MBA programs online can help you fast-track your advancement, equipping you with crucial management and strategic thinking skills.

Diverse career tracks are also available, such as legal technology roles. For a fast entry into this field, consider fast track paralegal programs—ideal for students interested in combining engineering, law, and technology.

Best Scientists Citing José Manuel García-Aznar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles