World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Ireland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
78
Citations
17578
World Ranking
623
National Ranking
3

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
78
Citations
17476
World Ranking
4639
National Ranking
24

Daniel J. Kelly publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Kelly sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 134 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 117 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 59 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 283 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Daniel J. Kelly D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Kelly sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 128 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 349 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 425 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 94 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 24 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Ireland Leader Award

Overview

Daniel J. Kelly is affiliated with Trinity College Dublin in Ireland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Engineering, with a particular focus on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Rheumatology, Biomaterials, and Automotive Engineering.

The scientist's work covers various topics in biomedical and engineering disciplines. These include Bone Tissue Engineering Materials, 3D Printing in Biomedical Research, Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms, Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies, Knee Injuries and Reconstruction Techniques, Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications.

Kelly has contributed to a number of recent research papers across high-impact journals. Selected publications include:

  • "Cancer therapy shapes the fitness landscape of clonal hematopoiesis" (2020) published in Nature Genetics
  • "Nano-particle mediated M2 macrophage polarization enhances bone formation and MSC osteogenesis in an IL-10 dependent manner" (2020) published in Biomaterials
  • "3D extrusion bioprinting" (2021) published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • "Ovarian cancer mutational processes drive site-specific immune evasion" (2022) published in Nature
  • "3D bioprinting spatiotemporally defined patterns of growth factors to tightly control tissue regeneration" (2020) published in Science Advances

Their frequent co-authors include Ross Burdis, Fiona E. Freeman, David C. Browe, Kian F. Eichholz, and Orquidea Garcia. Kelly's research outputs are often published in specific venues such as SSRN Electronic Journal, Acta Biomaterialia, Biofabrication, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Advanced Healthcare Materials.

Best Publications

  • Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: A review and suggested design principles

    Rukmani Sridharan;Rukmani Sridharan;Andrew R. Cameron;Andrew R. Cameron;Daniel J. Kelly;Cathal J. Kearney

  • Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering.

    Damien P. Byrne;Damien Lacroix;Josep A. Planell;Daniel J. Kelly

  • A comparison of different bioinks for 3D bioprinting of fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage

    Andrew C Daly;Susan E Critchley;Susan E Critchley;Emily M Rencsok;Daniel J Kelly

  • Material stiffness influences the polarization state, function and migration mode of macrophages.

    Rukmani Sridharan;Brenton Cavanagh;Andrew R. Cameron;Andrew R. Cameron;Daniel J. Kelly;Daniel J. Kelly

  • Nano-particle mediated M2 macrophage polarization enhances bone formation and MSC osteogenesis in an IL-10 dependent manner.

    Olwyn R. Mahon;David C. Browe;Tomas Gonzalez-Fernandez;Pierluca Pitacco

  • Tuning Alginate Bioink Stiffness and Composition for Controlled Growth Factor Delivery and to Spatially Direct MSC Fate within Bioprinted Tissues

    Fiona E. Freeman;Daniel J. Kelly

  • 3D extrusion bioprinting

    Yu Shrike Zhang;Ghazaleh Haghiashtiani;Tania Hübscher;Daniel J. Kelly

  • 3D Bioprinting for Cartilage and Osteochondral Tissue Engineering

    Andrew C. Daly;Andrew C. Daly;Fiona E. Freeman;Fiona E. Freeman;Tomas Gonzalez-Fernandez;Tomas Gonzalez-Fernandez;Susan E. Critchley;Susan E. Critchley

  • The role of mechanical signals in regulating chondrogenesis and osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells.

    Daniel J. Kelly;Christopher R. Jacobs

  • Mechanical regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation

    Andrew J. Steward;Andrew J. Steward;Daniel J. Kelly

  • 3D Bioprinting of Developmentally Inspired Templates for Whole Bone Organ Engineering

    Andrew C. Daly;Gráinne M. Cunniffe;Binulal N. Sathy;Oju Jeon

  • Mechano-regulation of stem cell differentiation and tissue regeneration in osteochondral defects.

    Daniel Kelly;Patrick John Prendergast

  • The response of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to dynamic compression following TGF-beta3 induced chondrogenic differentiation.

    Stephen D. Thorpe;Conor T. Buckley;Tatiana Vinardell;Fergal J. O’Brien;Fergal J. O’Brien

  • The shape and size of hydroxyapatite particles dictate inflammatory responses following implantation.

    Filipa Lebre;Rukmani Sridharan;Michael J Sawkins;Michael J Sawkins;Daniel J Kelly;Daniel J Kelly

  • 3D printed microchannel networks to direct vascularisation during endochondral bone repair.

    Andrew C. Daly;Pierluca Pitacco;Jessica Nulty;Gráinne M. Cunniffe

  • The influence of plaque composition on underlying arterial wall stress during stent expansion: The case for lesion-specific stents

    Ian Pericevic;Caitríona Lally;Deborah Toner;Daniel John Kelly

  • A comparison of the functionality and in vivo phenotypic stability of cartilaginous tissues engineered from different stem cell sources.

    Tatiana Vinardell;Eamon J. Sheehy;Conor T. Buckley;Daniel J. Kelly

  • Recapitulating bone development through engineered mesenchymal condensations and mechanical cues for tissue regeneration

    Anna M. McDermott;Anna M. McDermott;Anna M. McDermott;Samuel Herberg;Devon E. Mason;Devon E. Mason;Joseph M. Collins;Joseph M. Collins

  • 3D bioprinting spatiotemporally defined patterns of growth factors to tightly control tissue regeneration.

    Fiona E. Freeman;Pierluca Pitacco;Lieke H. A. van Dommelen;Jessica Nulty

  • Oxygen tension regulates the osteogenic, chondrogenic and endochondral phenotype of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells.

    Eamon J. Sheehy;Conor T. Buckley;Daniel J. Kelly

  • Prediction of the optimal mechanical properties for a scaffold used in osteochondral defect repair.

    Daniel Kelly;Patrick John Prendergast

  • Simulation of a balloon expandable stent in a realistic coronary artery—Determination of the optimum modelling strategy

    Houman Zahedmanesh;Daniel John Kelly;Caitríona Lally;Caitríona Lally

Frequent Co-Authors

Fergal J. O'Brien
Fergal J. O'Brien Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Patrick J. Prendergast
Patrick J. Prendergast Trinity College Dublin
Eben Alsberg
Eben Alsberg University of Illinois at Chicago
Valeria Nicolosi
Valeria Nicolosi Trinity College Dublin
Kurt D. Hankenson
Kurt D. Hankenson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Katja Schenke-Layland
Katja Schenke-Layland University of Tübingen
William L. Murphy
William L. Murphy University of Wisconsin–Madison
Damien Lacroix
Damien Lacroix University of Sheffield
Ketul C. Popat
Ketul C. Popat Colorado State University
C. Ross Ethier
C. Ross Ethier Georgia Institute of Technology

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to many dynamic career paths. Today, online degrees offer extra flexibility and accessibility for working professionals and international students alike.

For those interested in optimizing systems and processes, consider an online mba in operations management. This program combines technical expertise with business leadership, preparing graduates for roles in manufacturing, logistics, or tech-driven industries.

Many accredited universities now offer mba programs online no gmat required, making advanced business education more accessible than ever before. Cost also matters—students can explore an mba under 25k to receive a quality education without heavy financial strain.

Additionally, in a tech-driven world, digital communication skills are essential. Graduates looking to merge technology and creativity may be interested in colleges offering degrees in social media marketing. For more options, view top social media marketing colleges online.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Kelly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles