World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
7969
World Ranking
5508
National Ranking
1886

Kathryn E. Stoner publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn E. Stoner sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 101 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Kathryn E. Stoner D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn E. Stoner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kathryn E. Stoner is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including environmental science, social sciences, and agricultural and biological sciences. The scientist's work intersects key subfields such as ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, political science and international relations, ecology, global and planetary change, and ecological modeling.

The primary topics of Stoner's research include bat biology and ecology studies, species distribution and climate change, European and Russian geopolitical military strategies, wildlife ecology and conservation, post-Soviet geopolitical dynamics, primate behavior and ecology, and forest management and policy.

Stoner has authored and contributed to several recent publications. Notable papers include:

  • The War in Ukraine: How Putin's War in Ukraine Has Ruined Russia, 2022, Journal of democracy
  • Flower consumption, ambient temperature and rainfall modulate drinking behavior in a folivorous-frugivorous arboreal mammal, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Building a systems framework to facilitate adaptive organizational change in state fish and wildlife agencies, 2021, Conservation Science and Practice
  • Reenvisioning the university education needs of wildlife conservation professionals in the United States, 2022, Conservation Science and Practice
  • The Putin Myth, 2023, Journal of democracy

Stoner frequently collaborates with other researchers. Common coauthors include Theresa M. Laverty, Óscar M. Chaves, Vanessa Barbisan Fortes, Gabriela Pacheco Hass, and Renata Bocorny de Azevedo.

Their research has appeared prominently in the following publication venues:

  • Journal of democracy
  • Conservation Science and Practice
  • PLoS ONE
  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad

Best Publications

  • Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas

    William F. Laurance;William F. Laurance;D. Carolina Useche;Julio Rendeiro;Margareta Kalka

  • Research priorities for neotropical dry forests

    G. Arturo Sánchez-Azofeifa;Mauricio Quesada;Jon Paul Rodríguez;Jafet M. Nassar

  • Succession and management of tropical dry forests in the Americas: review and new perspectives.

    Mauricio Quesada;G. Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa;Mariana Alvarez-Añorve;Kathryn E. Stoner

  • Research Priorities for Neotropical Dry Forests1: Research Priorities for Neotropical Dry Forests

    G. Arturo Sánchez-Azofeifa;Mauricio Quesada;Jon Paul Rodríguez;Jafet M. Nassar

  • The Plight of Large Animals in Tropical Forests and the Consequences for Plant Regeneration

    S. Joseph Wright;Kathryn E. Stoner;Noelle G. Beckman;Richard T. Corlett

  • Hunting and plant community dynamics in tropical forests: A synthesis and future directions

    Kathryn E. Stoner;Kevina Vulinec;S. Joseph Wright;Carlos A. Peres

  • The role of mammals in creating and modifying seedshadows in tropical forests and some possible consequences of their elimination

    Kathryn E. Stoner;Pablo Riba-Hernández;Kevina Vulinec;Joanna E. Lambert

  • Factors affecting phenological patterns of bombacaceous trees in seasonal forests in Costa Rica and Mexico.

    Jorge A. Lobo;Mauricio Quesada;Kathryn E. Stoner;Eric J. Fuchs

  • EVOLUTION AND FUNCTION OF ROUTINE TRICHROMATIC VISION IN PRIMATES

    Peter W. Lucas;Nathaniel J. Dominy;Pablo Riba-Hernandez;Kathryn E. Stoner

  • Landscape and patch attributes impacting medium- and large-sized terrestrial mammals in a fragmented rain forest

    Adriana Garmendia;Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez;Alejandro Estrada;Eduardo J. Naranjo

  • Diet of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) in Mesoamerica: current knowledge and future directions.

    Arturo González-Zamora;Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez;Óscar M. Chaves;Sonia Sánchez-López

  • Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Pollinator Activity and Consequences for Plant Reproductive Success and Mating Patterns in Bat‐pollinated Bombacaceous Trees1

    Mauricio Quesada;Kathryn E. Stoner;Jorge A. Lobo;Yvonne Herrerias‐Diego

  • Effects of habitat disruption on the activity of nectarivorous bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in a dry tropical forest: implications for the reproductive success of the neotropical tree Ceiba grandiflora.

    Mauricio Quesada;Kathryn E. Stoner;Víctor Rosas-Guerrero;Carolina Palacios-Guevara

  • Differences in Diet Between Spider Monkey Groups Living in Forest Fragments and Continuous Forest in Mexico

    Óscar M. Chaves;Kathryn E. Stoner;Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez

  • Prevalence and Intensity of Intestinal Parasites in Mantled Howling Monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in Northeastern Costa Rica: Implications for Conservation Biology

    Kathryn E. Stoner

  • Changes in composition and structure of a tropical dry forest following intermittent cattle grazing.

    Margaret Stern;Mauricio Quesada;Kathryn E Stoner

  • Accounting for detectability improves estimates of species richness in tropical bat surveys

    Christoph F. J. Meyer;Christoph F. J. Meyer;Ludmilla M. S. Aguiar;Luis F. Aguirre;Julio Baumgarten

  • Local and Landscape Factors Determining Occurrence of Phyllostomid Bats in Tropical Secondary Forests

    Luis Daniel Avila-Cabadilla;Gerardo Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa;Kathryn Elizabeth Stoner;Mariana Yolotl Alvarez-Añorve

  • Why are young leaves red

    Nathaniel J. Dominy;Peter W. Lucas;Lawrence W. Ramsden;Pablo Riba-Hernandez

  • Population dynamics, reproduction, and diet of the lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris curasoae) in Jalisco, Mexico: implications for conservation

    Kathryn E. Stoner;Karla A. O.-Salazar;Roxana C. R.-Fernández;Mauricio Quesada

  • 21. THREATS TO THE CONSERVATION OF TROPICAL DRY FOREST IN COSTA RICA

    Mauricio Quesada;Kathryn E. Stoner

Frequent Co-Authors

Mauricio Quesada
Mauricio Quesada National Autonomous University of Mexico
Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez
Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez National Autonomous University of Mexico
Peter W. Lucas
Peter W. Lucas George Washington University
Elisabeth K. V. Kalko
Elisabeth K. V. Kalko University of Ulm
Nathaniel J. Dominy
Nathaniel J. Dominy Dartmouth College
Christoph F. J. Meyer
Christoph F. J. Meyer University of Salford
Alejandro Estrada
Alejandro Estrada National Autonomous University of Mexico
Colin A. Chapman
Colin A. Chapman Vancouver Island University
John A. Gamon
John A. Gamon University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Robert M. Timm
Robert M. Timm University of Kansas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a range of exciting career options, both in research and applied sciences. For individuals interested in combining environmental studies with healthcare, online nursing degrees offer a flexible way to diversify your skill set or pivot your career.

Many professionals choose bridge programs to advance in the health sector. Those looking for a streamlined route from an associate degree might consider asn to fnp programs, which prepare nurses for advanced family practice roles. If you hold a bachelor’s degree in another field, the option to enroll in direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online enables a faster transition into nursing.

Cost and value are key factors when considering online education. Comparing the best value nursing education online wgu options can help students make informed decisions. Additionally, current RNs with a BSN can further their qualifications affordably through the bsn to msn online pathways.

These flexible options allow learners from various backgrounds to align their career goals with evolving opportunities in healthcare, science, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Kathryn E. Stoner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles