What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Ecology, Phylogenetic tree, Dytiscidae, Biological dispersal and Endemism.
His study connects Morphology and Ecology.
His Phylogenetic tree study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Taxon, Phylogenetics, Adephaga and Cave.
His work deals with themes such as Zoology and Molecular phylogenetics, which intersect with Taxon.
His work in Dytiscidae addresses issues such as Monophyly, which are connected to fields such as Evolutionary biology, Spatial ecology, DNA barcoding, Interspecific competition and Intraspecific competition.
As a member of one scientific family, Ignacio Ribera mostly works in the field of Endemism, focusing on Biogeography and, on occasion, Hydraenidae, IUCN Red List, Conservation status, Habitat destruction and Endangered species.
His most cited work include:
- A Comprehensive Phylogeny of Beetles Reveals the Evolutionary Origins of a Superradiation (614 citations)
- Effect of land disturbance and stress on species traits of ground beetle assemblages (327 citations)
- The Effect of Geographical Scale of Sampling on DNA Barcoding (284 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Ecology, Zoology, Dytiscidae, Genus and Range.
His biological study deals with issues like Phylogenetic tree, which deal with fields such as Phylogenetics.
His study in Zoology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Taxon, Clade, Monophyly and Molecular phylogenetics.
As a part of the same scientific study, Ignacio Ribera usually deals with the Monophyly, concentrating on Adephaga and frequently concerns with Genetics.
The various areas that Ignacio Ribera examines in his Dytiscidae study include Paraphyly, Molecular clock and Noteridae.
As part of the same scientific family, he usually focuses on Range, concentrating on Endemism and intersecting with Biogeography.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (55.16%)
- Zoology (32.29%)
- Dytiscidae (22.42%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Ecology (55.16%)
- Zoology (32.29%)
- Dytiscidae (22.42%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Ecology, Zoology, Dytiscidae, Genus and Hydraenidae are his primary areas of study.
His Ecology research includes themes of Biological dispersal and Lineage.
In his work, Synonym and Taxon is strongly intertwined with Global biodiversity, which is a subfield of Zoology.
His Dytiscidae study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Archaeology, Meladema, Monophyly and Type species.
His research in Genus intersects with topics in Rensch's rule and Molecular phylogenetics, Phylogenetic tree.
His study in the fields of Ochthebius under the domain of Hydraenidae overlaps with other disciplines such as Humanities.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Phylogenetic niche conservatism explains an inverse latitudinal diversity gradient in freshwater arthropods (30 citations)
- A global database for metacommunity ecology, integrating species, traits, environment and space (28 citations)
- Thermal niche estimators and the capability of poor dispersal species to cope with climate change. (25 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary areas of study are Ecology, Dytiscidae, Biological dispersal, Lineage and Molecular phylogenetics.
His study in Phylogenetics extends to Ecology with its themes.
His research in Phylogenetics focuses on subjects like Seawater, which are connected to Habitat.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Interspecific competition and Phylogenetic tree.
His Lineage research focuses on Salinity and how it relates to Desiccation tolerance, Resistance, Aridification, Desiccation and Water beetle.
Ignacio Ribera has researched Molecular phylogenetics in several fields, including Cosmopolitan distribution, Hydraenidae, Tribe and Systematic Entomology.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
