World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
39590
World Ranking
8536
National Ranking
337

Emile E. Voest publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emile E. Voest sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 464 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Emile E. Voest D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emile E. Voest sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emile E. Voest is affiliated with Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital in the Netherlands and has made significant contributions to medical research, particularly in oncology and related molecular biology fields. Their scholarly output spans publications focused on cancer research, immunology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The primary fields of study for Emile E. Voest include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Specific subfields of their work emphasize Oncology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Immunology.

Key topics addressed in their research cover Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies, Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations, Genetic Factors in Colorectal Cancer, CAR-T Cell Therapy Research, and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging.

Frequent publication venues for Emile E. Voest include:

  • Annals of Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Nature Medicine
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Cancer Cell

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several peers, including Hans Gelderblom, Paul Roepman, Laurien J. Zeverijn, Henk M.W. Verheul, and Louisa R. Hoes.

Notable recent papers by Emile E. Voest include:

  • Neoadjuvant immunotherapy leads to pathological responses in MMR-proficient and MMR-deficient early-stage colon cancers, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • Caring for patients with cancer in the COVID-19 era, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • Delivering precision oncology to patients with cancer, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • Tumor organoids: Opportunities and challenges to guide precision medicine, 2021, Cancer Cell
  • Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colon Cancer, 2024, New England Journal of Medicine

Best Publications

  • Chemotherapy, Bevacizumab, and Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

    Jolien Tol;Miriam Koopman;Annemieke Cats;Cees J Rodenburg

  • A Living Biobank of Breast Cancer Organoids Captures Disease Heterogeneity

    Norman Sachs;Joep de Ligt;Oded Kopper;Ewa Gogola

  • Neoadjuvant immunotherapy leads to pathological responses in MMR-proficient and MMR-deficient early-stage colon cancers.

    Myriam Chalabi;Lorenzo F Fanchi;Krijn K Dijkstra;José G Van den Berg

  • Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review.

    Saskia C.C.M. Teunissen;Wendy Wesker;Cas Kruitwagen;Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes

  • Long-term expanding human airway organoids for disease modeling

    Norman Sachs;Angelos Papaspyropoulos;Domenique D. Zomer-van Ommen;Inha Heo

  • Generation of Tumor-Reactive T Cells by Co-culture of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes and Tumor Organoids

    Krijn K Dijkstra;Chiara M Cattaneo;Fleur Weeber;Myriam Chalabi

  • Inhibition of Angiogenesis In Vivo by Interleukin 12

    Emile E. Voest;Bärbel M. Kenyon;Michael S. O'Reilly;Gary Truitt

  • Pan-cancer whole-genome analyses of metastatic solid tumours

    Peter Priestley;Jonathan Baber;Martijn P. Lolkema;Neeltje Steeghs

  • Shared and separate functions of polo-like kinases and aurora kinases in cancer

    Susanne M. A. Lens;Emile E. Voest;René H. Medema

  • Low and variable tumor reactivity of the intratumoral TCR repertoire in human cancers

    Wouter Scheper;Sander Kelderman;Lorenzo F. Fanchi;Carsten Linnemann

  • Patient-derived organoids can predict response to chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

    Salo N. Ooft;Fleur Weeber;Krijn K. Dijkstra;Chelsea M. McLean

  • A model of angiogenesis in the mouse cornea.

    B M Kenyon;E E Voest;C C Chen;E Flynn

  • Reactive oxygen intermediates increase vascular endothelial growth factor expression in vitro and in vivo.

    Masatoshi Kuroki;Emile E. Voest;Emile E. Voest;Shiro Amano;Shiro Amano;Laurens V. Beerepoot;Laurens V. Beerepoot

  • Rapid Chemotherapy-Induced Acute Endothelial Progenitor Cell Mobilization: Implications for Antiangiogenic Drugs as Chemosensitizing Agents

    Yuval Shaked;Erik Henke;Jeanine M.L. Roodhart;Patrizia Mancuso

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Perspective: Raising the Bar for Clinical Trials by Defining Clinically Meaningful Outcomes

    Lee M. Ellis;David S. Bernstein;Emile E. Voest;Jordan D. Berlin

  • Tumor Organoids as a Pre-clinical Cancer Model for Drug Discovery.

    Fleur Weeber;Salo N. Ooft;Krijn K. Dijkstra;Emile E. Voest

  • Preserved genetic diversity in organoids cultured from biopsies of human colorectal cancer metastases

    Fleur Weeber;Marc van de Wetering;Marlous Hoogstraat;Krijn K Dijkstra

  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells Induce Resistance to Chemotherapy through the Release of Platinum-Induced Fatty Acids

    Jeanine M.L. Roodhart;Laura G.M. Daenen;Edwin C.A. Stigter;Henk Jan Prins

  • Limitations and possibilities of small RNA digital gene expression profiling.

    Sam E V Linsen;Elzo de Wit;Georges Janssens;Sheila Heater

  • Plasticity between Epithelial and Mesenchymal States Unlinks EMT from Metastasis-Enhancing Stem Cell Capacity

    Evelyne Beerling;Daniëlle Seinstra;Elzo de Wit;Elzo de Wit;Lennart Kester

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan H.M. Schellens
Jan H.M. Schellens Utrecht University
Edwin Cuppen
Edwin Cuppen Utrecht University
Stefan Sleijfer
Stefan Sleijfer Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jos H. Beijnen
Jos H. Beijnen Utrecht University
Rachel H. Giles
Rachel H. Giles Utrecht University
Henk M.W. Verheul
Henk M.W. Verheul Radboud University
Lodewyk F. A. Wessels
Lodewyk F. A. Wessels Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Onno Kranenburg
Onno Kranenburg Utrecht University
Haiko J. Bloemendal
Haiko J. Bloemendal Radboud University
John B. A. G. Haanen
John B. A. G. Haanen Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers beyond a traditional MD program, several affordable online degree options are available nationwide. These programs offer flexible pathways for students looking to enter in-demand fields within medicine and health services.

Students curious about health informatics may consider exploring online schools for health information management. These degrees prepare graduates to manage patient data, electronic health records, and crucial health information systems—skills that are increasingly vital in modern healthcare.

Those looking for a quick entry point into healthcare might explore a low cost medical coding and billing online program. This pathway helps students learn essential coding systems and billing procedures, opening doors to administrative roles in clinics, hospitals, and private practices.

For nurses seeking advanced roles, programs such as affordable np programs and accredited online nursing programs provide flexible options to earn higher degrees and credentials. These online pathways can lead to expanded career opportunities and increased earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Emile E. Voest

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles