World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
67
Citations
18145
World Ranking
8132
National Ranking
214

Rachel H. Giles publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel H. Giles sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 176 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Rachel H. Giles D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel H. Giles sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rachel H. Giles is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and has a research portfolio focused on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work extensively covers pulmonary and respiratory medicine, molecular biology, oncology, cancer research, and economics and econometrics.

Their main research topics include:

  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Economic and financial impacts of cancer
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Cancer genomics and diagnostics
  • Cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers
  • Genomics and rare diseases
  • Cancer, hypoxia, and metabolism

Rachel H. Giles has published frequently in the following scientific venues:

  • European Urology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • European Urology Open Science
  • Annals of Oncology
  • Cancer

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Updated European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib Joins Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Combination Therapies for Treatment-naïve Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, 2020, European Urology
  • Limitations of Available Studies Prevent Reliable Comparison Between Tumour Ablation and Partial Nephrectomy for Patients with Localised Renal Masses: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Renal Cell Cancer Guideline Panel, 2020, European Urology Oncology
  • Axitinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitor: evidence- and expert-based consensus recommendation for treatment optimisation and management of related adverse events, 2020, British Journal of Cancer
  • 2021 Updated European Association of Urology Guidelines on the Use of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab for Renal Cell Carcinoma, 2021, European Urology
  • CIViCdb 2022: evolution of an open-access cancer variant interpretation knowledgebase, 2022, Nucleic Acids Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Giles include:

  • Axel Bex
  • Laurence Albigès
  • Lorenzo Marconi
  • Saeed Dabestani
  • Börje Ljungberg

Best Publications

  • Caught up in a Wnt storm: Wnt signaling in cancer.

    Rachel H. Giles;Johan H. van Es;Hans Clevers

  • Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome caused by mutations in the transcriptional co-activator CBP

    Fred Petrif;Rachel H. Giles;Hans G. Dauwerse;Jasper J. Saris

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update.

    Börje Ljungberg;Laurance Albiges;Yasmin Abu-Ghanem;Karim Bensalah

  • Mutations in the APC tumour suppressor gene cause chromosomal instability

    Riccardo Fodde;Jeroen Kuipers;Jeroen Kuipers;Carla Rosenberg;Ron Smits

  • Mapping the NPHP-JBTS-MKS Protein Network Reveals Ciliopathy Disease Genes and Pathways

    Liyun Sang;Julie J. Miller;Kevin C. Corbit;Rachel H. Giles

  • Conjunction dysfunction: CBP/p300 in human disease

    Rachel H Giles;Dorien J.M Peters;Martijn H Breuning

  • Exome Capture Reveals ZNF423 and CEP164 Mutations, Linking Renal Ciliopathies to DNA Damage Response Signaling

    Moumita Chaki;Rannar Airik;Amiya K. Ghosh;Rachel H. Giles

  • Candidate exome capture identifies mutation of SDCCAG8 as the cause of a retinal-renal ciliopathy

    Edgar A Otto;Toby W Hurd;Rannar Airik;Moumita Chaki

  • Genetic analysis of von Hippel-Lindau disease.

    Morgan Nordstrom-O'Brien;Rob B. van der Luijt;Ellen van Rooijen;Ans M. van den Ouweland

  • Genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors involved in CAKUT

    Nayia Nicolaou;Kirsten Y Renkema;Ernie M H F Bongers;Rachel H Giles

  • FAN1 mutations cause karyomegalic interstitial nephritis, linking chronic kidney failure to defective DNA damage repair

    Weibin Zhou;Edgar A Otto;Andrew Cluckey;Rannar Airik

  • Updated European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma : Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Is the New Backbone in First-line Treatment of Metastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

    Laurence Albiges;Tom Powles;Michael Staehler;Karim Bensalah

  • An siRNA-based functional genomics screen for the identification of regulators of ciliogenesis and ciliopathy genes

    Gabrielle Wheway;Miriam Schmidts;Dorus A. Mans;Katarzyna Szymanska

  • Human Embryonic Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Conditioned Medium Rescues Kidney Function in Rats with Established Chronic Kidney Disease

    Arianne van Koppen;Jaap A. Joles;Bas W. M. van Balkom;Sai Kiang Lim

  • An organelle-specific protein landscape identifies novel diseases and molecular mechanisms

    Boldt K;van Reeuwijk J;Lu Q;Koutroumpas K

  • Functional aspects of primary cilia in signaling, cell cycle and tumorigenesis

    Sander G Basten;Rachel H Giles

  • The SYSCILIA gold standard (SCGSv1) of known ciliary components and its applications within a systems biology consortium

    Teunis Jp van Dam;Gabrielle Wheway;Gisela G Slaats;Martijn A Huynen

  • Updated European Association of Urology Guidelines: Recommendations for the Treatment of First-line Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cancer

    Thomas Powles;Laurence Albiges;Michael Staehler;Karim Bensalah

  • The many faces of the tumor suppressor gene APC.

    Johan H. van Es;Rachel H. Giles;Hans C. Clevers

  • Von Hippel-Lindau Disease: Genetics and Role of Genetic Counseling in a Multiple Neoplasia Syndrome

    Sarah M Nielsen;Lindsay Rhodes;Ignacio Guillermo Blanco;Wendy K Chung

Frequent Co-Authors

Emile E. Voest
Emile E. Voest Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Nine V.A.M. Knoers
Nine V.A.M. Knoers University Medical Center Groningen
Thomas Powles
Thomas Powles Queen Mary University of London
Ronald Roepman
Ronald Roepman Radboud University
Börje Ljungberg
Börje Ljungberg Umeå University
Laurence Albiges
Laurence Albiges Institut Gustave Roussy
Friedhelm Hildebrandt
Friedhelm Hildebrandt Boston Children's Hospital
Colin A. Johnson
Colin A. Johnson University of Leeds
marius ueffing
marius ueffing University of Tübingen
Martijn H. Breuning
Martijn H. Breuning Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to diverse, in-demand healthcare careers. Many students choose to specialize further with online degrees, allowing for greater flexibility and accessibility. For example, those interested in medical imaging may pursue options through ultrasound tech school online programs, which teach essential diagnostic skills in a digital format.

Individuals looking for rapid entry into the medical field might consider accelerated radiology tech programs online, combining science fundamentals with practical, hands-on experience. For those drawn to nutrition and patient care, registered dietitian masters programs can build upon a Biochemistry background, preparing graduates for licensure and advanced roles.

Additionally, aspiring healthcare professionals in Michigan and beyond can start their journey with medical assistant programs online michigan, providing foundational knowledge and clinical skills for entry-level positions. Whichever direction you choose, online programs make it possible to balance education with personal and professional commitments, transforming your science education into a rewarding career path.

Best Scientists Citing Rachel H. Giles

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles