World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
10885
World Ranking
6860
National Ranking
3722

Kelsie T. Forbush publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelsie T. Forbush sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kelsie T. Forbush D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelsie T. Forbush sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kelsie T. Forbush is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States and specializes primarily in the field of Psychology, with an extensive publication record. Their work focuses in particular on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, as well as Pharmacy and Sociology and Political Science as subfields of study.

Their research interests are concentrated around various topics including:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Kelsie T. Forbush has contributed significantly to scholarly literature, publishing frequently in several key venues. Their most common publication venues include:

  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Eating Behaviors
  • Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity
  • Psychological Assessment
  • World Psychiatry

Among recent papers associated with them, notable titles are:

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum, 2020, World Psychiatry
  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum, 2021, World Psychiatry
  • Food insecurity associated with elevated eating disorder symptoms, impairment, and eating disorder diagnoses in an American University student sample before and during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Eating-disorder psychopathology in female athletes and non-athletes: A meta-analysis, 2022, International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of attentional bias toward food in individuals with overweight and obesity, 2020, Appetite

Collaboration plays a role in their research, with frequent co-authors including Kara A. Christensen, Brianne N. Richson, Danielle A. N. Chapa, Yiyang Chen, and Sarah Johnson.

Best Publications

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;Thomas M. Achenbach

  • Development and Validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI)

    Kelsie T. Forbush;Jennifer E. Wildes;Lauren O. Pollack;Danica Dunbar

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): II. Externalizing superspectrum

    Unknown

  • Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice

    Camilo J. Ruggero;Roman Kotov;Christopher J. Hopwood;Michael First

  • The core symptoms of bulimia nervosa, anxiety, and depression: A network analysis.

    Cheri A. Levinson;Stephanie Zerwas;Benjamin Calebs;Kelsie Forbush

  • Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum.

    Roman Kotov;Katherine G Jonas;William T Carpenter;Michael N Dretsch

  • The effect of pathological gambling on families, marriages, and children.

    Martha C Shaw;Kelsie T Forbush;Jessica Schlinder;Eugene Rosenman

  • Neuropsychological characteristics and personality traits in pathological gambling.

    Kelsie T. Forbush;Martha Shaw;Margarita A. Graeber;Lauren Hovick

  • Gender norms, psychometric properties, and validity for the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory.

    Kelsie T. Forbush;Jennifer E. Wildes;Tyler K. Hunt

  • Relationships between perfectionism and specific disordered eating behaviors.

    Kelsie Forbush;Todd F. Heatherton;Pamela K. Keel

  • Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP

    Thomas A. Widiger;Bo Bach;Michael Chmielewski;Lee Anna Clark

  • Application of network analysis to identify interactive systems of eating disorder psychopathology

    K. T. Forbush;C. S. Q. Siew;M. S. Vitevitch

  • The structure of common and uncommon mental disorders.

    K. T. Forbush;D. Watson

  • Bupropion in the treatment of pathological gambling: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study.

    Donald W Black;Stephan Arndt;William H Coryell;Tami Argo

  • The Clinical Utility of Personality Subtypes in Patients with Anorexia Nervosa.

    Jennifer E. Wildes;Marsha D. Marcus;Ross D. Crosby;Rebecca M. Ringham

  • Racial/Ethnic Differences in Adults in Randomized Clinical Trials of Binge Eating Disorder

    Debra L. Franko;Heather Thompson-Brenner;Douglas R. Thompson;Christina Lynn Boisseau

  • Redefining Phenotypes to Advance Psychiatric Genetics: Implications From Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology

    Monika A. Waszczuk;Nicholas R. Eaton;Robert F. Krueger;Alexander J. Shackman

  • Is "drunkorexia" an eating disorder, substance use disorder, or both?

    Tyler K. Hunt;Kelsie T. Forbush

Frequent Co-Authors

David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Nicholas R. Eaton
Nicholas R. Eaton Stony Brook University
Kristian E. Markon
Kristian E. Markon University of Iowa
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University
Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt
Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt Oklahoma State University
Christopher J. Patrick
Christopher J. Patrick Florida State University
Aidan G. C. Wright
Aidan G. C. Wright University of Pittsburgh
Ulrich Reininghaus
Ulrich Reininghaus Heidelberg University
Bo Bach
Bo Bach University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up a range of online study options and diverse career pathways. One prominent route is becoming a substance abuse counselor, a career growing in demand across the United States.

Each state and city may have unique educational and licensing requirements for these roles. For instance, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Fort Worth must meet specific academic credentials and fieldwork experience. Similarly, substance abuse counselor requirements in Fremont include tailored local regulatory steps and training.

If you’re considering a future in Fresno, Fresno substance abuse counselors education requirements may require either a bachelor's or advanced psychology degree, as well as completing supervised clinical hours. Meanwhile, those wondering how to become a substance abuse counselor in Garland will find that state-specific licensing and specialized coursework are required for practice in this rewarding field.

Choosing the right online psychology degree and understanding local career requirements can help ensure a successful journey toward a fulfilling professional future.

Best Scientists Citing Kelsie T. Forbush

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles