World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 41 462 417 255 219 150 7508

Peter K. Hatemi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter K. Hatemi between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter K. Hatemi published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 76 publications in 2019. 3 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 76. Peak 76 publications in 2019. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 76 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
2006 2025

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter K. Hatemi: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 4
2008 7
2009 9
2010 10
2011 12
2012 16
2013 11
2014 10
2015 8
2016 32
2017 8
2018 16
2019 76
2020 32
2021 2
2022 4
2023 3
2024 2
2025 1
Total 264
Download as CSV

Peter K. Hatemi publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Hatemi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 146–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 150 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44 150
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Peter K. Hatemi D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Hatemi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32 41
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter K. Hatemi is primarily affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on sociology, political science, and psychology. The main subfields of study for Hatemi include Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a diverse range of interests within these fields. Notable papers include:

  • The Role of Child Perception and Motivation in Political Socialization, 2020, British Journal of Political Science
  • Ethics in field experimentation: A call to establish new standards to protect the public from unwanted manipulation and real harms, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Narcissism in Political Participation, 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Gray's False Accusations Necessitate Establishing Standards of Evidence for Making Claims of Misconduct, 2020, PS Political Science & Politics
  • The role of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism on mask wearing and vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2022, Current Psychology

Hatemi frequently collaborates with several co-authors, indicating a strong network within their research community. Frequent collaborators include Zoltán Fazekas, Rose McDermott, Brad Verhulst, Kevin B. Smith, and Christopher Ojeda.

The scientist's work is disseminated through various academic outlets, with repeated publications in venues such as Harvard Dataverse, PS Political Science & Politics, British Journal of Political Science, Human Nature, and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Research topics covered by Hatemi include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Social Media and Politics

This profile draws upon recent documented research outputs, co-authorship patterns, and publication venues to provide a comprehensive overview of Peter K. Hatemi's academic contributions across related social sciences and psychological disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits

    Douglas R. Oxley;Kevin B. Smith;John R. Alford;Matthew V. Hibbing

  • Correlation not Causation: The Relationship between Personality Traits and Political Ideologies

    Brad Verhulst;Lindon J. Eaves;Peter K. Hatemi;Peter K. Hatemi

  • The Politics of Mate Choice

    John R. Alford;Peter K. Hatemi;John R. Hibbing;Nicholas G. Martin

  • Not by twins alone: Using the extended family design to investigate genetic influence on political beliefs

    Peter K. Hatemi;John R. Hibbing;Sarah E. Medland;Matthew C. Keller

  • The genetics of politics: discovery, challenges, and progress

    Peter K. Hatemi;Rose McDermott

  • Genetic and Environmental Transmission of Political Attitudes Over a Life Time

    Peter K. Hatemi;Carolyn L. Funk;Sarah E. Medland;Hermine M. Maes

  • A Genome-Wide Analysis of Liberal and Conservative Political Attitudes

    Peter K. Hatemi;Nathan A. Gillespie;Lindon J. Eaves;Brion S. Maher

  • Is There a “Party” in Your Genes?:

    Peter K. Hatemi;John R. Alford;John R. Hibbing;Nicholas G. Martin

  • Genetic Influences on Political Ideologies: Twin Analyses of 19 Measures of Political Ideologies from Five Democracies and Genome-Wide Findings from Three Populations

    Peter K Hatemi;Sarah E Medland;Robert Klemmensen;Sven Oskarsson

  • The genetics of voting: an Australian twin study.

    Peter K. Hatemi;Peter K. Hatemi;Sarah E. Medland;Sarah E. Medland;Katherine I. Morley;Katherine I. Morley;Andrew C. Heath

  • Intuitive Ethics and Political Orientations: Testing Moral Foundations as a Theory of Political Ideology

    Kevin B. Smith;John R. Alford;John R. Hibbing;Nicholas G. Martin

  • Fear as a Disposition and an Emotional State: A Genetic and Environmental Approach to Out‐Group Political Preferences

    Peter K. Hatemi;Rose McDermott;Lindon J. Eaves;Kenneth S. Kendler

  • Genome-wide meta-analysis of cognitive empathy: heritability, and correlates with sex, neuropsychiatric conditions and cognition

    V. Warrier;K. L. Grasby;F. Uzefovsky;F. Uzefovsky;R. Toro;R. Toro

  • A Genetic Basis for Social Trust

    Patrick Sturgis;Sanna Read;Peter K. Hatemi;Gu Zhu

  • Political Science, Biometric Theory, and Twin Studies: A Methodological Introduction

    Sarah E. Medland;Peter K. Hatemi

  • Modeling Extended Twin Family Data I: Description of the Cascade Model

    Matthew C. Keller;Sarah E. Medland;Laramie E. Duncan;Peter K. Hatemi

  • Ideology Justifies Morality: Political Beliefs Predict Moral Foundations

    Peter K. Hatemi;Charles Crabtree;Kevin B. Smith

  • The nature of the relationship between personality traits and political attitudes

    Brad Verhulst;Peter K. Hatemi;Peter K. Hatemi;Nicholas G. Martin

  • The genetics of political participation, civic duty, and political efficacy across cultures: Denmark and the United States

    Robert Klemmensen;Peter K Hatemi;Sara Binzer Hobolt;Inge Petersen

  • Biology, Ideology, and Epistemology: How Do We Know Political Attitudes Are Inherited and Why Should We Care?

    Kevin Smith;John R Alford;Peter K. Hatemi;Lindon J. Eaves

  • The Dating Preferences of Liberals and Conservatives

    Casey A. Klofstad;Rose McDermott;Peter K. Hatemi

  • Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, biology, and politics

    Peter K. Hatemi;Rose McDermott

  • Accounting for the Child in the Transmission of Party Identification

    Christopher Ojeda;Peter K. Hatemi

Frequent Co-Authors

Rose McDermott
Rose McDermott Brown University
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Sarah E. Medland
Sarah E. Medland QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
John R. Alford
John R. Alford Rice University
Kevin B. Smith
Kevin B. Smith University of Nebraska–Lincoln
John R. Hibbing
John R. Hibbing University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Simon Baron-Cohen
Simon Baron-Cohen University of Cambridge
Thomas Bourgeron
Thomas Bourgeron Université Paris Cité
Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
David A. Hinds
David A. Hinds 23andMe (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Political Science graduates have a wide range of options when it comes to advancing their education and careers online. Many choose interdisciplinary paths, enhancing their expertise and job readiness. If you’re seeking a cost-effective route, consider a cheap online interdisciplinary studies degree. These programs provide valuable skills in research, communication, and analysis—essential for careers in government, law, or business.

History is a natural complement to Political Science. Exploring online graduate history programs can deepen your understanding of political contexts and enhance your critical thinking abilities.

For those looking to upskill quickly, consider online certificate programs that pay well. These short-term credentials can open doors to roles in public policy, data analysis, and administration. If speed is your priority, research what is the fastest masters degree program to help you earn your degree and advance your career in less time.

Best Scientists Citing Peter K. Hatemi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles