World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
25613
World Ranking
6031
National Ranking
2869

Nathaniel Beck publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathaniel Beck sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 74 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Nathaniel Beck D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathaniel Beck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathaniel Beck is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, including Environmental Science, Mathematics, and Computer Science.

Their work explores a range of specialized subfields such as Environmental Engineering, Applied Mathematics, and Artificial Intelligence. These areas reflect a combination of theoretical and applied approaches to complex scientific problems.

Key topics addressed in Nathaniel Beck's research include:

  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping

Nathaniel Beck collaborates with other researchers in their field, notably frequently partnering with Ye Wang.

Best Publications

  • WHAT TO DO (AND NOT TO DO) WITH TIME-SERIES CROSS-SECTION DATA

    Nathaniel L. Beck;Jonathan N. Katz

  • Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable

    Nathaniel Beck;Jonathan N. Katz;Richard Tucker

  • Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists

    Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier;Bradford S. Jones;R. Michael Alvarez;Nathaniel L. Beck

  • TIME-SERIES–CROSS-SECTION DATA: What Have We Learned in the Past Few Years?

    Nathaniel Beck

  • Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models

    Nathaniel Beck;Jonathan N. Katz

  • Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series–Cross-Section Political Economy Data

    Nathaniel Beck;Jonathan N. Katz

  • Space Is More than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy

    Nathaniel Beck;Kristian Skrede Gleditsch;Kyle Beardsley

  • Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon

    Nathaniel Beck;Jonathan N. Katz

  • Improving Quantitative Studies of International Conflict: A Conjecture

    Nathaniel Beck;Gary King;Langche Zeng

  • Beyond linearity by default: Generalized additive models

    Nathaniel Beck;Simon Jackman

  • Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential Approval

    Nathaniel Beck

  • Time-Series-Cross-Section Issues: Dynamics, 2004

    Nathaniel Beck;Jonathan N. Katz

  • Time‐Series Cross‐Section Methods

    Nathaniel Beck

  • Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series–Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo Experiments

    Nathaniel Beck;Jonathan N. Katz

  • Parties, Administrations, and American Macroeconomic Outcomes

    Nathaniel Beck

  • Elections and the Fed: Is There a Political Monetary Cycle?*

    Nathaniel Beck

  • Presidential Influence on the Federal Reserve in the 1970’s

    Nathaniel Beck

  • Beyond Ordinary Logit: Taking Time Seriously in Binary Time-Series-Cross-Section Models

    Nathaniel Beck;Jonathan N. Katz;Richard Tucker

  • Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance: A Corrigendum

    Nathaniel Beck;Jonathan N. Katz;R. Michael Alvarez;Geoffrey Garrett

  • Time‐series–cross‐section Data

    Nathaniel Beck

  • WHAT TO DO (AND NOT TO DO) WITH TIME-SERIES

    Nathaniel Beck;Jonathan N. Katz

  • 8. Nathaniel Beck and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (September): 634–47 Cited 398 times.

    Nathaniel Beck;Jonathan N. Katz

  • Have We Learned in the Past Few Years

    Nathaniel Beck

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary King
Gary King Harvard University
R. Michael Alvarez
R. Michael Alvarez California Institute of Technology
Geoffrey Garrett
Geoffrey Garrett University of Southern California
Simon Jackman
Simon Jackman University of Sydney
Kristian Skrede Gleditsch
Kristian Skrede Gleditsch University of Essex
Kyle Beardsley
Kyle Beardsley Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse career options, especially with the rise of online education. Many students seek flexibility and affordability when choosing professional pathways in counseling, therapy, psychology, or social work.

Those interested in counseling can benefit from cacrep-accredited programs online, which meet strict standards for training and are often required for licensure. For students drawn to relationship and family issues, an online masters in marriage and family therapy offers specialized skills important for success in clinical and organizational settings.

Psychology remains a popular choice, and pursuing an online degree in psychology can lead to roles in research, mental health, or human resources. Another essential area is social work, where completing one of the msw online programs helps students serve vulnerable communities and become licensed social workers.

No matter your chosen path, online programs make it easier to balance study with other commitments while preparing for impactful careers in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Nathaniel Beck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles