World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 63 8346 7580 2409 2001 190 15706

Paul E. Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul E. Smith between 1967 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul E. Smith published across 60 years, from 1967 to 2026, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1999. 6 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1999. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 8 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 2 publications
1967 2026

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul E. Smith: publications per year, 1967 to 2026
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 4
1989 4
1990 2
1991 8
1992 6
1993 9
1994 6
1995 9
1996 1
1997 8
1998 3
1999 11
2000 8
2001 5
2002 3
2003 7
2004 5
2005 3
2006 8
2007 4
2008 9
2009 7
2010 9
2011 9
2012 3
2013 6
2014 2
2015 8
2016 2
2017 5
2018 5
2019 5
2020 4
2021 9
2022 1
2023 3
2024 2
2025 4
2026 2
Total 213
Download as CSV

Paul E. Smith publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 190 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344 190
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul E. Smith D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834 63
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul E. Smith is affiliated with Kansas State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Materials Science, particularly focusing on areas such as Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Their research involves several specialized topics including:

  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Magnetism in coordination complexes
  • Electron Spin Resonance Studies
  • Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
  • Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
  • Electrical Fault Detection and Protection

Smith has published in multiple venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Sci
  • Surveys in Geophysics

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Smith include:

  • Co-Processing of [Fe(NH2trz)3](2ns)2 and UHMWPE into Materials Combining (Spin Crossover and High Mechanical Strength, 2020, Sci
  • Co-Processing of [Fe(NH2trz)3](2ns)2 and UHMWPE into Materials Combining Spin Crossover and High Mechanical Strength, 2021, Sci
  • CCDC 2036005: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination, 2020, The Cambridge Structural Database
  • CCDC 2036002: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination, 2020, The Cambridge Structural Database
  • CCDC 2072583: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination, 2021, The Cambridge Structural Database

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • M. Zeller
  • S.R. Byrn
  • D.K. Purcell
  • K.L. Clase
  • Mercy A. Okezue

Best Publications

  • A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations

    Ilario G. Tironi;René Sperb;Paul E. Smith;Wilfred F. van Gunsteren

  • Counter-ion induced processibility of conducting polyaniline and of conducting polyblends of polyaniline in bulk polymers

    Yong Cao;Paul Smith;Alan J. Heeger

  • Binary Organic Photovoltaic Blends: A Simple Rationale for Optimum Compositions

    Christian Müller;Toby A. M. Ferenczi;Mariano Campoy-Quiles;Jarvist M. Frost

  • Counter-ion induced processibility of conducting polyaniline

    Yong Cao;Paul Smith;Alan J. Heeger

  • Multicomponent semiconducting polymer systems with low crystallization-induced percolation threshold

    Shalom Goffri;Christian Müller;Natalie Stingelin-Stutzmann;Natalie Stingelin-Stutzmann;Dag W. Breiby

  • Solution-cast films of polyaniline: Optical-quality transparent electrodes

    Yong Cao;George M. Treacy;Paul Smith;Alan J. Heeger

  • Organic thin-film electronics from vitreous solution-processed rubrene hypereutectics.

    Natalie Stingelin-Stutzmann;Natalie Stingelin-Stutzmann;Natalie Stingelin-Stutzmann;Edsger Smits;Edsger Smits;Harry Wondergem;Cristina Tanase

  • Residence Times of Water Molecules in the Hydration Sites of Myoglobin

    Vladimir A. Makarov;Vladimir A. Makarov;B. Kim Andrews;Paul E. Smith;B. Montgomery Pettitt

  • A Kirkwood−Buff Derived Force Field for Mixtures of Urea and Water

    Samantha Weerasinghe;Paul E. Smith

  • Consistent dielectric properties of the simple point charge and extended simple point charge water models at 277 and 300 K

    Paul E. Smith;Wilfred F. van Gunsteren

  • High strength in combination with high toughness in robust and sustainable polymeric materials

    Xiaojian Liao;Martin Dulle;Juliana Martins de Souza e Silva;Ralf B. Wehrspohn;Ralf B. Wehrspohn

  • Dielectric properties of trypsin inhibitor and lysozyme calculated from molecular dynamics simulations

    Paul E. Smith;Roger M. Brunne;Alan E. Mark;Wilfred F. Van Gunsteren

  • A Kirkwood–Buff derived force field for sodium chloride in water

    Samantha Weerasinghe;Paul E. Smith

  • Simulated surface tensions of common water models.

    Feng Chen;Paul E. Smith

  • Recent Applications of Kirkwood–Buff Theory to Biological Systems

    Veronica Pierce;Myungshim Kang;Mahalaxmi Aburi;Mahalaxmi Aburi;Samantha Weerasinghe;Samantha Weerasinghe

  • CONVERGENCE PROPERTIES OF FREE ENERGY CALCULATIONS : ALPHA -CYCLODEXTRIN COMPLEXES AS A CASE STUDY

    Alan E. Mark;Steven P. van Helden;Paul E. Smith;Lambert H. M. Janssen

  • The viscosity of SPC and SPC/E water at 277 and 300 K

    Paul E. Smith;Wilfred F. van Gunsteren

  • MODELING SOLVENT IN BIOMOLECULAR SYSTEMS

    Paul E. Smith;B. Montgomery Pettitt

  • Peptides in ionic solutions: A comparison of the Ewald and switching function techniques

    Paul E. Smith;B. Montgomery Pettitt

  • THE ALANINE DIPEPTIDE FREE ENERGY SURFACE IN SOLUTION

    Paul E. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

B. Montgomery Pettitt
B. Montgomery Pettitt The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Christoph Weder
Christoph Weder University of Fribourg
Cees W. M. Bastiaansen
Cees W. M. Bastiaansen Eindhoven University of Technology
Alan E. Mark
Alan E. Mark University of Queensland
Christian Müller
Christian Müller Chalmers University of Technology
Stephan Förster
Stephan Förster Forschungszentrum Jülich
Dimitri A. Ivanov
Dimitri A. Ivanov Acteurs, Ressources et Territoires dans le Développement
Anja R. A. Palmans
Anja R. A. Palmans Eindhoven University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities that often intersect with healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and forensic science. For those interested in the pharmaceutical industry, becoming a drug rep salary and career path offers a dynamic route combining science knowledge with communication skills.

If you are drawn to patient care and medication management, exploring how to become a pharmacist salary prospects can provide insight into a well-compensated career requiring advanced education and licensing.

For those passionate about forensic science, an online forensic science degree offers flexibility and a focused curriculum that supports careers in criminal investigations and laboratory analysis.

Additionally, careers such as an autopsy technician require specialized training and provide unique job opportunities. Learning more about how to become an autopsy technician includes understanding educational pathways and expected salary ranges in this field.

Exploring these related degrees and career pathways can enhance your professional options and align your Chemistry education with evolving industry demands.

Best Scientists Citing Paul E. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles