World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
65
Citations
27718
World Ranking
1735
National Ranking
143

Mike P. Austin publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike P. Austin sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mike P. Austin D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike P. Austin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mike P. Austin is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research contributions are associated primarily with this institution, reflecting involvement in scientific and industrial research activities within the country.

No specific recent publications, co-authors, or frequent publication venues are documented for Mike P. Austin in the available data. Similarly, there are no recorded book publications or detailed lists of main fields, subfields, or main topics of study.

This profile reflects the known professional association of the scientist along with the absence of detailed public information on published work, collaborative networks, or research focus areas based on the current data set.

Best Publications

  • Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems

    Nick M. Haddad;Lars A. Brudvig;Jean Clobert;Kendi F. Davies

  • Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling

    M.P Austin

  • Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions

    A. Guisan;R. Tingley;J. B. Baumgartner;I. Naujokaitis-Lewis

  • Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches

    Mike Austin

  • Continuum Concept, Ordination Methods, and Niche Theory

    M P Austin

  • Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: variable selection and scale

    Mike P. Austin;Kimberly P. Van Niel

  • Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: An appraisal

    Juli G. Pausas;Mike P. Austin

  • A new model for the continuum concept

    M. P. Austin;T. M. Smith

  • Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species

    M. P. Austin;A. O. Nicholls;C. R. Margules

  • Making better biogeographical predictions of species’ distributions

    Antoine Guisan;Anthony Lehmann;Simon Ferrier;Mike Austin

  • New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures

    M. P. Austin;R. B. Cunningham;P. M. Fleming

  • No Consistent Effect of Plant Diversity on Productivity

    M. A. Huston;L. W. Aarssen;M. P. Austin;B. S. Cade

  • Models for the analysis of species’ response to environmental gradients

    M. P. Austin

  • Searching for a Model for Use in Vegetation Analysis

    M. P. Austin

  • Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of eucalypts: implication for management of forest biodiversity

    M.P. Austin;J.A. Meyers

  • Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Biological Surveys and Data Analysis

    Unknown

  • Vegetation survey design for conservation: Gradsect sampling of forests in North-eastern New South Wales

    Mike P. Austin;P.C. Heyligers

  • COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TREE SPECIES IN NEW ZEALAND'S OLD‐GROWTH INDIGENOUS FORESTS

    J. R. Leathwick;M. P. Austin

  • On non-linear species response models in ordination

    M. P. Austin

  • Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of a β‐function

    M.P. Austin;A.O. Nicholls;M.D. Doherty;J.A. Meyers

  • Evaluation of statistical models used for predicting plant species distributions: Role of artificial data and theory

    M.P. Austin;L. Belbin;J.A. Meyers;M.D. Doherty

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Garnier
Eric Garnier University of Montpellier
Juli G. Pausas
Juli G. Pausas University of Valencia
Simon Ferrier
Simon Ferrier Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
John L. Orrock
John L. Orrock University of Wisconsin–Madison
William F. Laurance
William F. Laurance James Cook University
Lars A. Brudvig
Lars A. Brudvig Michigan State University
Kendi F. Davies
Kendi F. Davies University of Colorado Boulder
Bryan L. Foster
Bryan L. Foster University of Kansas
Antoine Guisan
Antoine Guisan University of Lausanne
Roger M. Gifford
Roger M. Gifford Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can lead to diverse and rewarding career paths, but many students are also looking for flexible options that bridge science with healthcare or teaching. For those who might consider switching fields or expanding their expertise, several online accelerated nursing programs for non nurses are now available, offering a streamlined pathway into nursing from a non-nursing background.

Understanding your potential career trajectory is also important. Factors like location and specialization can impact salary ranges. For example, if you pursue advanced nursing, knowing the dnp pmhnp salary can help with planning and decision-making.

Time is another key consideration—many wonder how long does it take to be a nurse practitioner. With the right accelerated programs, it’s possible to enter professional roles faster than traditional programs allow.

For those with an RN license, the accelerated bsn programs let you earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing in as little as six months. These pathways are ideal for students inspired by life sciences who want a quick transition into impactful, in-demand careers.

Best Scientists Citing Mike P. Austin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles