World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
7875
World Ranking
8917
National Ranking
658

Sebastian Halder publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sebastian Halder sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sebastian Halder D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sebastian Halder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sebastian Halder is a researcher affiliated with the University of Essex in the United Kingdom. Their work spans fields that primarily encompass Neuroscience and Computer Science, with a focused interest in subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their research topics reflect a strong concentration on brain-computer interfaces and neural mechanisms, including:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Frequent co-authors associated with their publications include:

  • Ana Matran-Fernandez
  • Andrea Kübler
  • Lorin Sweeney
  • Graham Healy
  • Alan F. Smeaton

Sebastian Halder's recent academic papers illustrate their contribution to contemporary neuroscience and brain-computer interface research. Notable publications include:

  • "Assessing the specificity of the relationship between brain alpha oscillations and tonic pain", 2022, published in NeuroImage
  • "Changes in measures of consciousness during anaesthesia of one hemisphere (Wada test)", 2020, published in NeuroImage
  • "Post-Adaptation Effects in a Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Online Coadaptive Paradigm", 2021, published in IEEE Access
  • "Stimulus modality influences session-to-session transfer of training effects in auditory and tactile streaming-based P300 brain-computer interfaces", 2020, published in Scientific Reports
  • "Two sides of the same coin: adaptation of BCIs to internal states with user-centered design and electrophysiological features", 2022, published in Brain-Computer Interfaces

The most frequent venues where this researcher publishes include:

  • TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • NeuroImage
  • Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Digital Access to Libraries

Best Publications

  • A P300-based brain–computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    F. Nijboer;E.W. Sellers;J. Mellinger;M.A. Jordan

  • Neurophysiological Predictor of SMR-based BCI Performance

    Benjamin Blankertz;Claudia Sannelli;Sebastian Halder;Eva M. Hammer

  • An auditory multiclass brain-computer interface with natural stimuli: Usability evaluation with healthy participants and a motor impaired end user.

    Nadine Simon;Ivo Käthner;Carolin A. Ruf;Emanuele Pasqualotto

  • An auditory oddball (P300) spelling system for brain‐computer interfaces

    A. Furdea;S. Halder;D.J. Krusienski;D. Bross

  • A Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Auditory Event-Related Potential (P300) Spelling System for Locked-In Patients

    Andrea Kübler;Andrea Kübler;Adrian Furdea;Adrian Furdea;Sebastian Halder;Eva Maria Hammer

  • Effects of mental workload and fatigue on the P300, alpha and theta band power during operation of an ERP (P300) brain-computer interface

    Ivo Käthner;Selina C. Wriessnegger;Gernot R. Müller-Putz;Andrea Kübler

  • Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain-computer interface use.

    S.C. Kleih;F. Nijboer;S. Halder;A. Kübler;A. Kübler

  • Psychological predictors of SMR-BCI performance

    Eva Maria Hammer;Sebastian Halder;Benjamin Blankertz;Claudia Sannelli

  • Design and Implementation of a P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Controlling an Internet Browser

    Emily M Mugler;Carolin A Ruf;Sebastian Halder;Michael Bensch

  • Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses

    Ander Ramos-Murguialday;Markus Schürholz;Vittorio Caggiano;Moritz Wildgruber

  • Brain Painting: First Evaluation of a New Brain–Computer Interface Application with ALS-Patients and Healthy Volunteers

    Jana I. Münßinger;Sebastian Halder;Sonja C. Kleih;Sonja C. Kleih;Adrian Furdea

  • Probing command following in patients with disorders of consciousness using a brain-computer interface.

    Dorothée Lulé;Quentin Noirhomme;Sonja C. Kleih;Sonja C. Kleih;Camille Chatelle

  • An auditory oddball brain-computer interface for binary choices

    S. Halder;M. Rea;R. Andreoni;F. Nijboer

  • Neural mechanisms of brain-computer interface control.

    Sebastian Halder;D. Agorastos;Ralf Veit;Eva M. Hammer

  • Transition from the locked in to the completely locked-in state: A physiological analysis

    A. Ramos Murguialday;J. Hill;M. Bensch;S. Martens

  • A brain-computer interface as input channel for a standard assistive technology software.

    Claudia Zickler;Angela Riccio;Francesco Leotta;Sandra Hillian-Tress

  • Brain Painting

    Claudia Zickler;Sebastian Halder;Sonja C. Kleih;Cornelia Herbert

  • Online artifact removal for brain-computer interfaces using support vector machines and blind source separation

    Sebastian Halder;Michael Bensch;Jürgen Mellinger;Martin Bogdan

  • Control of an Internet Browser Using the P300 Event- Related Potential

    Michael Bensch;Sebastian Halder;Wolfgang Rosenstiel;Andrea Kübler

  • A portable auditory P300 brain-computer interface with directional cues.

    Ivo Käthner;Carolin A. Ruf;Emanuele Pasqualotto;Christoph Braun;Christoph Braun

  • Prediction of brain-computer interface aptitude from individual brain structure

    Sebastian Halder;Balint Varkuti;Martin Bogdan;Andrea Kübler

  • Effects of training and motivation on auditory P300 brain–computer interface performance

    E. Baykara;C.A. Ruf;C. Fioravanti;I. Käthner

  • Out of the frying pan into the fire—the P300-based BCI faces real-world challenges

    Sonja C. Kleih;Tobias Kaufmann;Claudia Zickler;Sebastian Halder

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea Kübler
Andrea Kübler University of Würzburg
Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
Wolfgang Rosenstiel
Wolfgang Rosenstiel University of Tübingen
Gernot R. Müller-Putz
Gernot R. Müller-Putz Graz University of Technology
Alireza Gharabaghi
Alireza Gharabaghi University of Tübingen
Benjamin Blankertz
Benjamin Blankertz Technical University of Berlin
Klaus-Robert Müller
Klaus-Robert Müller Technical University of Berlin
Christoph Braun
Christoph Braun University of Tübingen
Boris Kotchoubey
Boris Kotchoubey University of Tübingen
Hans-Joachim Wunderlich
Hans-Joachim Wunderlich University of Stuttgart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience opens up diverse online study options in the USA. Many students are exploring accelerated bachelors programs to earn their degrees faster and start their professional journeys sooner. These flexible programs are ideal for adult learners or those wanting to balance work and study.

Neuroscience shares strong links with STEM fields, many of which are among the highest paying majors. Degrees in areas such as biomedical engineering, computer science, and data analytics can prepare you for lucrative roles that intersect with neuroscience, as shown on the highest paying majors lists.

Affordability is also an important consideration. There are a variety of online schools that accept fafsa and provide financial aid options for eligible students, helping to make neuroscience and related degrees accessible to more people.

Best Scientists Citing Sebastian Halder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles