World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 49 5812 5646 2643 2549 145 11796

Brendan Z. Allison publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brendan Z. Allison between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brendan Z. Allison published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2017. 7 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2017. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brendan Z. Allison: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 4
2004 1
2005 0
2006 2
2007 1
2008 7
2009 6
2010 13
2011 13
2012 17
2013 8
2014 16
2015 3
2016 8
2017 22
2018 11
2019 7
2020 7
2021 6
2022 4
2023 4
2024 5
2025 6
2026 1
Total 173
Download as CSV

Brendan Z. Allison publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brendan Z. Allison sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 142–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609 145
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Brendan Z. Allison D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brendan Z. Allison sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543 49
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Brendan Z. Allison is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Neuroscience, Engineering, and Medicine, with a primary focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and several related subfields.

The scientist's work notably centers on areas such as EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery. Additional topics include Muscle activation and electromyography studies, Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology, Advanced Memory and Neural Computing, and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies.

Brendan Z. Allison has contributed to a variety of peer-reviewed journals, with frequent publications in Frontiers in Neuroscience, TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology), Frontiers for Young Minds, Psychophysiology, and Nature Reviews Bioengineering.

Among the recent publications are:

  • Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients-A Feasibility Study, 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • EEG Biomarkers Related With the Functional State of Stroke Patients, 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • 30+ years of P300 brain-computer interfaces, 2020, Psychophysiology
  • Translation of neurotechnologies, 2024, Nature Reviews Bioengineering
  • Brain-computer interface treatment for gait rehabilitation in stroke patients, 2023, Frontiers in Neuroscience

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers. Their regular co-authors include Christoph Guger, Rupert Ortner, Jing Jin, Andrzej Cichocki, and Marc Sebastián-Romagosa.

Best Publications

  • The Hybrid BCI

    Gert Pfurtscheller;Brendan Z. Allison;Clemens Brunner;Gunther Bauernfeind

  • Brain–computer interface systems: progress and prospects

    Brendan Z Allison;Elizabeth Winter Wolpaw;Jonathan R Wolpaw

  • Towards an independent brain–computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials

    Brendan Z. Allison;Dennis J. McFarland;Gerwin Schalk;Shi Dong Zheng

  • P300 brain computer interface: current challenges and emerging trends

    Reza Fazel-Rezai;Brendan Z. Allison;Christoph Guger;Eric W. Sellers

  • BCI Demographics: How Many (and What Kinds of) People Can Use an SSVEP BCI?

    Brendan Allison;Thorsten Luth;Diana Valbuena;Amir Teymourian

  • Could Anyone Use a BCI

    Brendan Zachary Allison;Christa Neuper;Christa Neuper

  • Brain-Computer Interfaces: Revolutionizing Human-Computer Interaction

    Bernhard Graimann;Brendan Z. Allison;Gert Pfurtscheller

  • Brain-Computer Interfacing for Intelligent Systems

    A. Nijholt;D. Tan

  • Toward a hybrid brain-computer interface based on imagined movement and visual attention.

    Brendan Zachary Allison;Clemens Brunner;Vera Kaiser;Gernot Müller-Putz

  • Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Gentle Introduction

    Bernhard Graimann;Brendan Allison;Gert Pfurtscheller

  • An SSVEP BCI to Control a Hand Orthosis for Persons With Tetraplegia

    R Ortner;B Z Allison;G Korisek;H Gaggl

  • The effects of self-movement, observation, and imagination on /spl mu/ rhythms and readiness potentials (RP's): toward a brain-computer interface (BCI)

    J.A. Pineda;B.Z. Allison;A. Vankov

  • A survey of affective brain computer interfaces: principles, state-of-the-art, and challenges

    Christian Mühl;Brendan Allison;Anton Nijholt;Guillaume Chanel

  • ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system

    B.Z. Allison;J.A. Pineda

  • Brain-Computer Interfaces

    Bernhard Graimann;Gert Pfurtscheller;Brendan Allison

  • Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm

    Brendan Z. Allison;John Polich

  • Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for p300 brain-computer interfaces.

    Christoph Guger;Gunther Krausz;Brendan Z. Allison;Guenter Edlinger

  • How Many People Could Use an SSVEP BCI

    Christoph Guger;Brendan Z. Allison;Bernhard Großwindhager;Robert Prückl

  • BCI meeting 2005-workshop on signals and recording methods

    J.R. Wolpaw;G.E. Loeb;B.Z. Allison;E. Donchin

  • Method and system for a real time adaptive system for effecting changes in cognitive-emotive profiles

    Jaime A. Pineda;Brendan Z. Allison

  • An adaptive P300-based control system.

    Jing Jin;Brendan Zachary Allison;Eric Sellers;Clemens Brunner

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph Guger
Christoph Guger Graz University of Technology
Clemens Brunner
Clemens Brunner University of Graz
Christa Neuper
Christa Neuper University of Graz
Jing Jin
Jing Jin East China University of Science and Technology
Gernot R. Müller-Putz
Gernot R. Müller-Putz Graz University of Technology
Xingyu Wang
Xingyu Wang East China University of Science and Technology
Gert Pfurtscheller
Gert Pfurtscheller Graz University of Technology
Anton Nijholt
Anton Nijholt University of Twente
Reinhold Scherer
Reinhold Scherer University of Essex
Jaime A. Pineda
Jaime A. Pineda University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options can be a great way to advance your career in computer science or related fields. Many students are drawn to the quickest masters degree online to save time and accelerate their entry into the workforce. These programs are designed for efficiency, allowing you to graduate faster without sacrificing quality.

When considering a graduate degree, it’s important to select programs recognized for quality and career value. Check out the most worthwhile masters degrees to see which programs are in demand and offer strong job prospects. These fields can include data science, information systems, and cybersecurity.

If you’re just starting out, online associate degree programs provide a flexible entry point into tech careers. These programs can help you gain essential skills in less time and at a lower cost than traditional degrees.

For budget-conscious students, many cheap online degrees fast are available, letting you minimize student debt while opening doors to lucrative career pathways. Carefully research each option to find a program that aligns with your academic and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Brendan Z. Allison

Trending Scientists