World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
11037
World Ranking
6346
National Ranking
2764

Jaime A. Pineda publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaime A. Pineda sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 104 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jaime A. Pineda D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaime A. Pineda sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jaime A. Pineda is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans across the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Social Psychology.

Their work addresses a range of topics such as Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Tracheal and Airway Disorders, and the Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment.

Several frequent coauthors have collaborated with them, including Fiza Singh, I-Wei Shu, Eric Granholm, Keriann Van Nostrand, and Niral M. Patel.

Pineda has published in various venues, notably in Mediastinum with two publications, and others such as Brain, Schizophrenia Bulletin Open, NeuroImage Clinical, and Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist), 2020, Brain
  • A Systematic Review of the Potential Use of Neurofeedback in Patients With Schizophrenia, 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
  • Modulation of frontal gamma oscillations improves working memory in schizophrenia, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Brain-Computer Interface Training of mu EEG Rhythms in Intellectually Impaired Children with Autism: A Feasibility Case Series, 2023, Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
  • Revisiting the Potential of EEG Neurofeedback for Patients With Schizophrenia, 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin

Best Publications

  • EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders.

    Lindsay M. Oberman;Edward M. Hubbard;Joseph P. McCleery;Eric L. Altschuler;Eric L. Altschuler

  • The functional significance of mu rhythms: translating "seeing" and "hearing" into "doing".

    Jaime A. Pineda

  • The human mirror neuron system: A link between action observation and social skills

    Lindsay M. Oberman;Jaime A. Pineda;Vilayanur S. Ramachandran

  • Modulation of Mu Suppression in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders in Response to Familiar or Unfamiliar Stimuli: The Mirror Neuron Hypothesis.

    Lindsay M. Oberman;Vilayanur S. Ramachandran;Jaime A. Pineda

  • Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist)

    Tomas Ros;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert;Vadim Zotev;Kymberly D Young

  • EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots

    Lindsay M. Oberman;Joseph P. McCleery;Vilayanur S. Ramachandran;Jaime A. Pineda

  • The effects of self-movement, observation, and imagination on /spl mu/ rhythms and readiness potentials (RP's): toward a brain-computer interface (BCI)

    J.A. Pineda;B.Z. Allison;A. Vankov

  • ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system

    B.Z. Allison;J.A. Pineda

  • Recognition of point-light biological motion: Mu rhythms and mirror neuron activity

    Erlinda R. Ulloa;Jaime A. Pineda

  • Sensorimotor cortex as a critical component of an 'extended' mirror neuron system: Does it solve the development, correspondence, and control problems in mirroring?

    Jaime A Pineda

  • Learning to control brain rhythms: making a brain-computer interface possible

    J.A. Pineda;D.S. Silverman;A. Vankov;J. Hestenes

  • Effects of locus coeruleus lesions on auditory, long-latency, event- related potentials in monkey

    JA Pineda;SL Foote;HJ Neville

  • Electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of the locus coeruleus in alerting, orienting, and attending.

    S.L. Foote;C.W. Berridge;L.M. Adams;J.A. Pineda

  • Mirroring and mu rhythm involvement in social cognition: are there dissociable subcomponents of theory of mind?

    J.A. Pineda;E. Hecht

  • Atypical Cross Talk Between Mentalizing and Mirror Neuron Networks in Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Inna Fishman;Christopher L. Keown;Alan J. Lincoln;Jaime A. Pineda

  • Method and system for a real time adaptive system for effecting changes in cognitive-emotive profiles

    Jaime A. Pineda;Brendan Z. Allison

  • Positive behavioral and electrophysiological changes following neurofeedback training in children with autism

    J.A. Pineda;D. Brang;E. Hecht;L. Edwards

  • Hepatic resection in the management of complex injury to the liver.

    Patricio M Polanco;Stuart Leon;Jaime Pineda;Juan C. Puyana

  • Effects of SOA and flash pattern manipulations on ERPs, performance, and preference: implications for a BCI system.

    Brendan Z. Allison;Jaime A. Pineda

  • Communication methods based on brain computer interfaces

    Brendan Z. Allison;Jaime A. Pineda

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen L. Foote
Stephen L. Foote University of California, San Diego
Vilayanur S. Ramachandran
Vilayanur S. Ramachandran University of California, San Diego
Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli
Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli Northeastern University
Martin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Daniel Brandeis
Daniel Brandeis University of Zurich
Eric Granholm
Eric Granholm University of California, San Diego
Frank A. Russo
Frank A. Russo Toronto Metropolitan University
Alan J. Lincoln
Alan J. Lincoln Alliant International University
Ralph-Axel Müller
Ralph-Axel Müller San Diego State University
John Gruzelier
John Gruzelier Goldsmiths University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jaime A. Pineda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles