World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
7181
World Ranking
7831
National Ranking
3361

Reha S. Erzurumlu publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reha S. Erzurumlu sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 128 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Reha S. Erzurumlu D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reha S. Erzurumlu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Reha S. Erzurumlu is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with an emphasis on cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, and neurology. Additional interests include social psychology and electrical and electronic engineering.

Their main research topics include:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Neuroscience and neural engineering
  • Axon guidance and neuronal signaling
  • Advanced memory and neural computing
  • Anesthesia and neurotoxicity research

Reha S. Erzurumlu has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • How the Barrel Cortex Became a Working Model for Developmental Plasticity: A Historical Perspective, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Wireless Optogenetic Modulation of Cortical Neurons Enabled by Radioluminescent Nanoparticles, 2021, ACS Nano
  • Amyloid Deposition and Dendritic Complexity of Corticocortical Projection Cells in Five Familial Alzheimer's Disease Mouse, 2022, Neuroscience
  • Layers 3 and 4 Neurons of the Bilateral Whisker-Barrel Cortex, 2022, Neuroscience
  • In vivo voltage-sensitive dye imaging of mouse cortical activity with mesoscopic optical tomography, 2020, Neurophotonics

Frequent coauthors in Erzurumlu's collaborations include:

  • Gülgün Şengül
  • Emel Ulupınar
  • Vassiliy Tsytsarev
  • Céline Plachez
  • Shuxin Zhao

Their work is regularly published in scientific venues such as:

  • Neuroscience
  • ACS Nano
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neurophotonics
  • Methods in Molecular Biology

Best Publications

  • Cortex-restricted disruption of NMDAR1 impairs neuronal patterns in the barrel cortex

    Takuji Iwasato;Akash Datwani;Alexander M. Wolf;Hiroshi Nishiyama

  • Whisker-related neuronal patterns fail to develop in the trigeminal brainstem nuclei of NMDAR1 knockout mice

    Yuqing Li;Reha S. Erzurumlu;Chong Chen;Sonal Jhaveri

  • Development and Critical Period Plasticity of the Barrel Cortex

    Reha S. Erzurumlu;Patricia Gaspar;Patricia Gaspar

  • Mapping the face in the somatosensory brainstem

    Reha S. Erzurumlu;Yasunori Murakami;Filippo M. Rijli

  • Neural activity: sculptor of 'barrels' in the neocortex

    Reha S Erzurumlu;Peter C Kind

  • NMDA receptor-dependent refinement of somatotopic maps.

    Takuji Iwasato;Reha S Erzurumlu;Patricio T Huerta;Dong Feng Chen

  • Trigeminal projections to the superior colliculus of the rat

    Herbert P. Killackey;Reha S. Erzurumlu

  • Thalamic axons confer a blueprint of the sensory periphery onto the developing rat somatosensory cortex.

    Unknown

  • Development of order in the rat trigeminal system.

    Reha S. Erzurumlu;Reha S. Erzurumlu;Herbert P. Killackey;Herbert P. Killackey

  • NMDA receptor-dependent pattern transfer from afferents to postsynaptic cells and dendritic differentiation in the barrel cortex.

    Akash Datwani;Takuji Iwasato;Shigeyoshi Itohara;Reha S. Erzurumlu

  • A Comparison of Pattern Formation by Thalamocortical and Serotonergic Afferents in the Rat Barrel Field Cortex

    M. E. Blue;R. S. Erzurumlu;S. Jhaveri

  • Barrel construction in rodent neocortex: role of thalamic afferents versus extracellular matrix molecules.

    Sonal Jhaveri;Reha S. Erzurumlu;Kathryn Crossin

  • Differential organization of thalamic projection cells in the brain stem trigeminal complex of the rat.

    Reha S. Erzurumlu;Carolyn A. Bates;Herbert P. Killackey

  • Neuropilin 1-Sema signaling regulates crossing of cingulate pioneering axons during development of the corpus callosum.

    Michael Piper;Céline Plachez;Oressia Zalucki;Oressia Zalucki;Thomas Fothergill

  • Neurovascular coupling: in vivo optical techniques for functional brain imaging

    Lun De Liao;Vassiliy Tsytsarev;Ignacio Delgado-Martínez;Meng Lin Li

  • Efferent connections of the brainstem trigeminal complex with the facial nucleus of the rat

    Reha S. Erzurumlu;Herbert P. Killackey

  • NMDA Receptor-Dependent Regulation of Axonal and Dendritic Branching

    Li-Jen Lee;Fu-Sun Lo;Reha S. Erzurumlu

  • Emergence of connectivity in the embryonic rat parietal cortex.

    Unknown

  • Exuberant thalamocortical axon arborization in cortex-specific NMDAR1 knockout mice.

    Li-Jen Lee;Takuji Iwasato;Shigeyoshi Itohara;Reha S. Erzurumlu

  • Transient patterns of GAP-43 expression during the formation of barrels in the rat somatosensory cortex.

    Reha S. Erzurumlu;Sonal Jhaveri;Larry I. Benowitz

  • Cortical Adenylyl Cyclase 1 Is Required for Thalamocortical Synapse Maturation and Aspects of Layer IV Barrel Development

    Takuji Iwasato;Melis Inan;Hiroaki Kanki;Reha S. Erzurumlu

  • Neurotransmitter release at the thalamocortical synapse instructs barrel formation but not axon patterning in the somatosensory cortex.

    Nicolas Narboux-Nême;Alexis Evrard;Isabelle Ferezou;Reha S. Erzurumlu

  • Role of whiskers in sensorimotor development of C57BL/6 mice.

    Hiroyuki Arakawa;Reha S. Erzurumlu

Frequent Co-Authors

Filippo M. Rijli
Filippo M. Rijli Friedrich Miescher Institute
Linda J. Richards
Linda J. Richards Washington University in St. Louis
Alain Chédotal
Alain Chédotal Institut de la Vision
Mary E. Blue
Mary E. Blue Kennedy Krieger Institute
Nitish V. Thakor
Nitish V. Thakor National University of Singapore
Sergey M. Borisov
Sergey M. Borisov Graz University of Technology
Dmitri B. Papkovsky
Dmitri B. Papkovsky University College Cork
Shigeyoshi Itohara
Shigeyoshi Itohara RIKEN Center for Brain Science
Huanghao Yang
Huanghao Yang Fuzhou University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, exploring related online degrees can expand your knowledge and widen your career options. Fast-track options exist, like msw accelerated programs for students aiming for social work or clinical settings. These programs help you develop crucial counseling and care skills useful in many neuroscience-linked professions.

Psychology is another popular pathway. There are flexible options such as a 2 year psychology degree online, which can be valuable for those wishing to quickly specialize in mental health or research careers.

For those interested in counseling, consider a cacrep online masters in counseling, designed to meet strict licensure standards and boost your professional credibility. Budget-conscious students can also pursue the cheapest online master's in counseling to minimize debt while gaining essential knowledge.

These diverse online degrees support various career pathways in neuroscience, including clinical research, counseling, therapy, and community health. Carefully consider your interests, career goals, and preferred learning style when choosing the right online program.

Best Scientists Citing Reha S. Erzurumlu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles