World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
4404
World Ranking
9523
National Ranking
4022

Carol A. Bennett-Clarke publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol A. Bennett-Clarke sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Carol A. Bennett-Clarke D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol A. Bennett-Clarke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carol A. Bennett-Clarke is affiliated with the University of Toledo Medical Center in the United States. Their research profile, based on available data, shows a focus on academic and scientific inquiry within a medical or health-related institutional setting.

No specific information is available about the main fields or subfields of study, recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed topics of work connected with Carol A. Bennett-Clarke.

There are no recorded citations or awards attributed to this scientist in the accessible data, nor is there any indication of deceased status. Consequently, the professional activities and contributions are presented in the present tense.

This profile is constructed solely from verified facts and does not include speculative or unconfirmed details. It serves as an objective overview based on the current knowledge about the scientist's institutional affiliation and absence of other detailed data elements.

Best Publications

  • Distribution of somatostatin in the rat brain: Telencephalon and diencephalon

    Carol Bennett-Clarke;Maryann A. Romagnano;Shirley A. Joseph

  • Immunocytochemical localization of ACTH perikarya in nucleus tractus solitarius: evidence for a second opiocortin neuronal system.

    Shirley A. Joseph;Webster H. Pilcher;Carol Bennett-Clarke

  • Effect of serotonin depletion on vibrissa-related patterns of thalamic afferents in the rat's somatosensory cortex

    CA Bennett-Clarke;MJ Leslie;RD Lane;RW Rhoades

  • The formation of a cortical somatotopic map

    Herbert P. Killackey;Robert W. Rhoades;Carol A. Bennett-Clarke

  • Thalamic processing of vibrissal information in the rat. I. Afferent input to the medial ventral posterior and posterior nuclei.

    Nicolas L. Chiaia;Robert W. Rhoades;Carol A. Bennett-Clarke;Stephen E. Fish

  • Postnatal blockade of cortical activity by tetrodotoxin does not disrupt the formation of vibrissa-related patterns in the rat's somatosensory cortex.

    Nicolas L. Chiaia;Stephen E. Fish;William R. Bauer;Carol A. Bennett-Clarke

  • Patterning of local intracortical projections within the vibrissae representation of rat primary somatosensory cortex.

    Brian F. Hoeflinger;Carol A. Bennett-Clarke;Nicolas L. Chiaia;Herbert P. Killackey

  • Effects of 5-HT on Thalamocortical Synaptic Transmission in the Developing Rat

    R. W. Rhoades;C. A. Bennett-Clarke;Ming-Yi Shi;R. D. Mooney

  • Serotonin 1B receptors in the developing somatosensory and visual cortices are located on thalamocortical axons.

    Carol A. Bennett-Clarke;Michael J. Leslie;Nicolas L. Chiaia;Robert W. Rhoades

  • Development and lesion induced reorganization of the cortical representation of the rat's body surface as revealed by immunocytochemistry for serotonin.

    Robert W. Rhoades;Carol A. Bennett-Clarke;Nicolas L. Chiaia;Fletcher A. White

  • Immunocytochemical distribution of LHRH neurons and processes in the rat: hypothalamic and extrahypothalamic locations.

    Carol Bennett-Clarke;Shirley A. Joseph

  • Effects of serotonin on neurite outgrowth from thalamic neurons in vitro.

    V. Lieske;C.A. Bennett-Clarke;R.W. Rhoades

  • Evidence for prenatal competition among the central arbors of trigeminal primary afferent neurons

    Nicolas L. Chiaia;Carol A. Bennett-Clarke;Marcia Eck;Fletcher A. White

  • Parvalbumin and calbindin immunocytochemistry reveal functionally distinct cell groups and vibrissa-related patterns in the trigeminal brainstem complex of the adult rat.

    Carol A. Bennett-Clarke;Nicolas L. Chiaia;Mark F. Jacquin;Robert W. Rhoades

  • Thalamocortical afferents in rat transiently express high-affinity serotonin uptake sites

    Carol A Bennett-Clarke;Nicolas L Chiaia;Robert W Rhoades

  • Hypotension preferentially induces c-fos immunoreactivity in supraoptic vasopressin neurons.

    E Shen;S L Dun;C Ren;C Bennett-Clarke

  • Axon and ganglion cell injury in rabbits after percutaneous trigeminal balloon compression.

    Jeffrey A. Brown;Brian Hoeflinger;Phillip B. Long;William T. Gunning

  • Organization of the projections from the trigeminal brainstem complex to the superior colliculus in the rat and hamster: Anterograde tracing with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin and intra-axonal injection

    Robert W. Rhoades;Stephen E. Fish;Nicolas L. Chiaia;Carol Bennett‐Clarke

  • The Source of the Transient Serotoninergic Input to the Developing Visual and Somatosensory Cortices in Rat

    C.A. Bennett-Clarke;N.L. Chiaia;R.S. Crissman;R.W. Rhoades

  • Serotonin 1B receptors form a transient vibrissa-related pattern in the primary somatosensory cortex of the developing rat.

    Michael J. Leslie;Carol A. Bennett-Clarke;Robert W. Rhoades

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert W. Rhoades
Robert W. Rhoades University of Toledo Medical Center
Herbert P. Killackey
Herbert P. Killackey University of California, Irvine
Fletcher A. White
Fletcher A. White Indiana University
Miguel A. L. Nicolelis
Miguel A. L. Nicolelis Duke University
Eugene M. Johnson
Eugene M. Johnson Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in neuroscience often means exploring a range of educational and career options. Many students are drawn to interesting majors that pay well, and neuroscience is often ranked highly for those aiming for competitive salaries in the health and research sectors.

For those looking for affordable options, there are fafsa-approved online certificate programs that can provide a strong foundation in related fields like biology, psychology, and data science. These programs offer financial aid opportunities and flexible online study.

Students interested in building specialized skills can opt for certifications online in subjects such as neuroimaging, cognitive science, or medical technology. These credentials can boost employability and open doors to new roles in healthcare and research.

If you prefer a faster path to employment, there are also easy degrees to get online, which can provide access to entry-level positions in the neuroscience field or related industries. Choosing the right pathway depends on your goals, budget, and desired career outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Carol A. Bennett-Clarke

Recently Published Articles