World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
7098
World Ranking
6508
National Ranking
2823

Rick C.S. Lin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick C.S. Lin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 86 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Rick C.S. Lin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick C.S. Lin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rick C.S. Lin was affiliated with the University of Mississippi Medical Center in the United States. Their research spanned multiple fields including Medicine and Nursing, with a focus on subfields such as Dermatology and Nutrition and Dietetics.

Their main research topics concentrated on Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects, Dermatology and Skin Diseases, and Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research.

The scientist published studies primarily in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Notable recent papers included:

  • Acne vulgaris and risk of depression and anxiety: A meta-analytic review, 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Coauthors who frequently collaborated with Rick C.S. Lin were:

  • Danielle V. Samuels
  • Robert Rosenthal
  • Soham Chaudhari
  • Misaki N. Natsuaki

Best Publications

  • Sensorimotor encoding by synchronous neural ensemble activity at multiple levels of the somatosensory system

    Miguel A. L. Nicolelis;Luiz A. Baccala;Rick C. S. Lin;John K. Chapin

  • Neonatal antidepressant exposure has lasting effects on behavior and serotonin circuitry.

    Dorota Maciag;Kimberly L Simpson;David Coppinger;Yuefeng Lu

  • Adenosine A3 receptor stimulation and cerebral ischemia

    Dag K.J.E. Von Lubitz;Rick C.-S. Lin;Piotr Popik;Margaret F. Carter

  • Re-expression of the intermediate filament nestin in reactive astrocytes

    R.C.S. Lin;D.F. Matesic;M. Marvin;R.D.G. McKay

  • Induction of immediate spatiotemporal changes in thalamic networks by peripheral block of ascending cutaneous information.

    Miguel A. L. Nicolelis;Miguel A. L. Nicolelis;Rick C. S. Lin;Donald J. Woodward;John K. Chapin

  • Microtubule-associated protein 2 as an early indicator of ischemia-induced neurodegeneration in the gerbil forebrain.

    Diane F. Matesic;Rick C. S. Lin

  • Perinatal antidepressant exposure alters cortical network function in rodents

    Kimberly L. Simpson;Kristin J. Weaver;Etienne de Villers-Sidani;Jordan Y.-F. Lu

  • Recovery of functional and structural age-related changes in the rat primary auditory cortex with operant training

    Etienne de Villers-Sidani;Loai Alzghoul;Xiaoming Zhou;Kimberly L. Simpson

  • Cerebral ischemia in gerbils: effects of acute and chronic treatment with adenosine A2A receptor agonist and antagonist.

    Dag K.J.E. Von Lubitz;Rick C.S. Lin;Kenneth A. Jacobson

  • Lateralization and functional organization of the locus coeruleus projection to the trigeminal somatosensory pathway in rat.

    Kimberly L. Simpson;Daniel W. Altman;Li Wang;Michael L. Kirifides

  • Somatotopic maps within the zona incerta relay parallel GABAergic somatosensory pathways to the neocortex, superior colliculus, and brainstem

    Miguel A.L. Nicolelis;John K. Chapin;Rick C.S. Lin

  • Manipulating critical period closure across different sectors of the primary auditory cortex

    Etienne de Villers-Sidani;Kimberly L Simpson;Y-F Lu;Rick C S Lin

  • Chronic administration of selective adenosine A1 receptor agonist or antagonist in cerebral ischemia

    Dag K.J.E. Von Lubitz;R.C.-S. Lin;Neli Melman;Xiao-duo Ji

  • Dynamic and distributed properties of many-neuron ensembles in the ventral posterior medial thalamus of awake rats.

    Miguel A. L. Nicolelis;Rick C. S. Lin;Donald J. Woodward;John K. Chapin

  • Topographic organization and neurochemical identity of dorsal raphe neurons that project to the trigeminal somatosensory pathway in the rat.

    Michael L. Kirifides;Kimberly L. Simpson;Rick C.‐S. Lin;Barry D. Waterhouse

  • Internucleosomal DNA fragmentation in gerbil hippocampus following forebrain ischemia

    Yoshitatsu Sei;Dag K.J.E. Von Lubitz;Anthony S. Basile;Markus M. Borner

  • Monoamine oxidase A and A/B knockout mice display autistic-like features

    Marco Bortolato;Sean C. Godar;Loai Alzghoul;Junlin Zhang

  • The effects of adenosine A3 receptor stimulation on seizures in mice.

    Dag K.J.E. Von Lubitz;Margaret F. Carter;Stephen I. Deutsch;Rick C.-S. Lin

  • Relative sparing of GABAergic interneurons in the striatum of gerbils with ischemia-induced lesions.

    C. Gonzales;R.C.-S. Lin;M.-F. Chesselet

  • Functional organization of the dorsal raphe efferent system with special consideration of nitrergic cell groups.

    Rani K. Vasudeva;Rick C.S. Lin;Kimberly L. Simpson;Barry D. Waterhouse

Frequent Co-Authors

Miguel A. L. Nicolelis
Miguel A. L. Nicolelis Duke University
John K. Chapin
John K. Chapin State University of New York
Barry D. Waterhouse
Barry D. Waterhouse Rowan University
Yi Pang
Yi Pang University of Mississippi Medical Center
Zhengwei Cai
Zhengwei Cai University of Mississippi Medical Center
Michael M. Merzenich
Michael M. Merzenich University of California, San Francisco
Marco Bortolato
Marco Bortolato University of Florida
Donald J. Woodward
Donald J. Woodward University of North Carolina School of Medicine
Anthony S. Basile
Anthony S. Basile National Institutes of Health
Nora D. Volkow
Nora D. Volkow National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Rick C.S. Lin

Recently Published Articles