World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
7504
World Ranking
5785
National Ranking
1972

T. Scott Rupp publications per year

2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publications
2000 2021

66 publications in total across all disciplines

T. Scott Rupp publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Scott Rupp sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 66 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

T. Scott Rupp D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Scott Rupp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

T. Scott Rupp is affiliated with the University of Alaska Fairbanks in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on environmental and earth sciences with a particular emphasis on the interactions between climate dynamics and ecological systems in Arctic and sub-Arctic regions.

Their scholarly work spans several fields of study, including:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, their research delves into specific subfields such as:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • General Health Professions

The scientist's main topics of research cover:

  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Climate variability and models
  • Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Cryospheric studies and observations

Recent publications authored or co-authored by T. Scott Rupp include:

  • A Comparison of Fire Weather Indices with MODIS Fire Days for the Natural Regions of Alaska, 2020, published in Forests
  • Emerging Anthropogenic Influences on the Southcentral Alaska Temperature and Precipitation Extremes and Related Fires in 2019, 2021, published in Land
  • Co-producing knowledge: the Integrated Ecosystem Model for resource management in Arctic Alaska, 2020, published in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Their work frequently appears in the following publication venues:

  • Forests
  • Land
  • Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

T. Scott Rupp has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Robert Ziel
  • Peter A. Bieniek
  • Uma S. Bhatt
  • Heidi Strader
  • Alison York

The focus on fire effects and climate-related ecosystem responses highlights their contributions to understanding environmental change in northern latitudes. Their interdisciplinary approach incorporates ecological monitoring, climate science, and resource management strategies relevant to Arctic Alaska and similar environments.

Best Publications

  • Role of Land-Surface Changes in Arctic Summer Warming

    F. S. Chapin;M. Sturm;Mark C. Serreze;J.P. McFadden

  • Alaska's changing fire regime--implications for the vulnerability of its boreal forests

    Eric S. KasischkeE.S. Kasischke;David L. VerbylaD.L. Verbyla;T. Scott RuppT.S. Rupp;A. David McGuireA.D. McGuire

  • A classification of landscape fire succession models: spatial simulations of fire and vegetation dynamics

    Robert E Keane;Geoffrey J Cary;Ian D Davies;Michael D Flannigan

  • The Arctic freshwater system: Changes and impacts

    Daniel White;Larry Hinzman;Lilian Alessa;John Cassano

  • Disturbance Dynamics and Ecological Response: The Contribution of Long-Term Ecological Research

    Monica G. Turner;Scott L. Collins;Ariel L. Lugo;John J. Magnuson

  • Comparison of the sensitivity of landscape-fire-succession models to variation in terrain, fuel pattern, climate and weather

    Geoffrey J. Cary;Robert E. Keane;Robert H. Gardner;Sandra Lavorel

  • Increasing Wildfire in Alaska's Boreal Forest: Pathways to Potential Solutions of a Wicked Problem

    F. Stuart Chapin;Sarah F. Trainor;Orville Huntington;Amy L. Lovecraft

  • IMPACTS OF LARGE‐SCALE ATMOSPHERIC–OCEAN VARIABILITY ON ALASKAN FIRE SEASON SEVERITY

    Paul A. Duffy;John E. Walsh;Jonathan M. Graham;Daniel H. Mann

  • Response of subarctic vegetation to transient climatic change on the Seward Peninsula in north‐west Alaska

    T. Scott Rupp;F. Stuart Chapin;Anthony M. Starfield

  • Assessing fire risk in the wildland-urban interface

    Robert G. Haight;David T. Cleland;Roger B. Hammer;Volker C. Radeloff

  • MODELING THE INFLUENCE OF TOPOGRAPHIC BARRIERS ON TREELINE ADVANCE AT THE FOREST-TUNDRA ECOTONE IN NORTHWESTERN ALASKA

    T. Scott Rupp;F. Stuart Chapin;Anthony M. Starfield

  • Analysis of vegetation distribution in Interior Alaska and sensitivity to climate change using a logistic regression approach

    Monika P. Calef;A. David McGuire;Howard E. Epstein;T. Scott Rupp

  • Patterns and dynamics of treeline advance on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska

    Andrea H. Lloyd;T. Scott Rupp;Christopher L. Fastie;Anthony M. Starfield

  • Is Alaska's Boreal Forest Now Crossing a Major Ecological Threshold?

    Daniel H. Mann;T. Scott Rupp;Mark A. Olson;Paul A. Duffy

  • Modeling impacts of fire severity on successional trajectories and future fire behavior in Alaskan boreal forests

    Jill F. Johnstone;Jill F. Johnstone;T. Scott Rupp;Mark Olson;David Verbyla

  • Arctic communities perceive climate impacts on access as a critical challenge to availability of subsistence resources

    Todd J. Brinkman;Winslow D. Hansen;Winslow D. Hansen;F. Stuart Chapin;Gary Kofinas

  • Evidence and implications of recent and projected climate change in Alaska's forest ecosystems

    Jane M. Wolken;Teresa N. Hollingsworth;T. Scott Rupp;Stuart Iii Chapin

  • Planning for resilience: modeling change in human–fire interactions in the Alaskan boreal forest

    F Stuart Chapin;T Scott Rupp;Anthony M. Starfield;La-ona DeWilde

  • Resilience of Athabascan subsistence systems to interior Alaska's changing climate

    Gary P. KofinasG.P. Kofinas;F. Stuart ChapinF.S. Chapin;Shauna BurnSilverS. BurnSilver;Jennifer I. SchmidtJ.I. Schmidt

  • Analysis of Alaskan burn severity patterns using remotely sensed data

    Paul A. Duffy;Justin Epting;Jonathan M. Graham;T. Scott Rupp

Frequent Co-Authors

A. David McGuire
A. David McGuire University of Alaska Fairbanks
F. Stuart Chapin
F. Stuart Chapin University of Alaska Fairbanks
John Walsh
John Walsh University of Alaska Fairbanks
Uma S. Bhatt
Uma S. Bhatt University of Alaska Fairbanks
Eugénie S. Euskirchen
Eugénie S. Euskirchen University of Alaska Fairbanks
Philip E. Higuera
Philip E. Higuera University of Montana
Bruce K. Wylie
Bruce K. Wylie United States Geological Survey
Knut Kielland
Knut Kielland University of Alaska Fairbanks
Daniel H. Mann
Daniel H. Mann University of Alaska Fairbanks
Sandra Lavorel
Sandra Lavorel Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a wide range of impactful careers and complementary online degrees. Many students interested in these fields also consider supporting or alternative paths, such as human services, psychology, or counseling. For those seeking flexibility and affordability, some of the cheapest masters in counseling online programs provide accessible pathways to work in community outreach, environmental advocacy, and education.

If you're fascinated by behavioral research or wish to understand human interactions with nature, an online masters in clinical psychology can deepen your expertise. Alternatively, those seeking faster entry into the field might pursue an online degree in human services, ideal for roles in nonprofit, conservation, or social impact organizations.

Career changers are also welcome in related fields. For instance, if you're wondering, can a teacher become a speech pathologist, the answer is yes—demonstrating the flexibility and diversity of online degree and career pathways for those passionate about making a difference.

Best Scientists Citing T. Scott Rupp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles