World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
11158
World Ranking
9250
National Ranking
3902

Eric W. Sellers publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric W. Sellers sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Eric W. Sellers D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric W. Sellers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric W. Sellers is affiliated with East Tennessee State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and clinical applications related to brain function and behavior.

Their recent publications demonstrate a particular concentration on brain-computer interfaces, motivation, cognitive processes, and hearing science. Notable papers include:

  • The Effect of Task Based Motivation on BCI Performance: a Preliminary Outlook (2020), Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University
  • The Effects Of Motivation On Task Performance Using A Brain-Computer Interface (2020), Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University
  • Performance Monitoring and Cognitive Inhibition during a Speech-in-Noise Task in Older Listeners (2023), Seminars in Hearing
  • The cognitive tasks and event-related potentials associated childhood adversity: A systematic review (2024), Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • UTILITY OF ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND IN GASTRIC CANCER STAGING (2022), Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

The range of coauthors collaborating with Eric W. Sellers includes researchers such as David B. Ryan, Mark A. Eckert, Kim S. Schairer, Matthew T. McBee, and Elizabeth A. Ridley. These collaborations reflect an interdisciplinary approach linking neuroscience, clinical psychology, and medicine.

Sellers' work has been published primarily in venues connected with East Tennessee State University, including the Digital Commons repository, as well as in peer-reviewed journals like Seminars in Hearing, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

The main fields of study encompassing Sellers' research are Neuroscience and Medicine. Subfields of particular focus include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Surgery
  • Speech and Hearing
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Psychology

The central topics addressed in Sellers' research cover various aspects of brain and behavior sciences with emphasis on:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Child Abuse and Trauma

Best Publications

  • A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller

    Dean J Krusienski;Eric W Sellers;François Cabestaing;Sabri Bayoudh

  • A P300-based brain-computer interface: initial tests by ALS patients.

    Eric W. Sellers;Emanuel Donchin

  • Toward enhanced P300 speller performance

    D.J. Krusienski;E.W. Sellers;D.J. McFarland;T.M. Vaughan

  • A comprehensive review of EEG-based brain-computer interface paradigms.

    Reza Abiri;Soheil Borhani;Eric W Sellers;Yang Jiang

  • How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?

    Christoph Guger;Shahab Daban;Eric Sellers;Clemens Holzner

  • A P300-based brain–computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    F. Nijboer;E.W. Sellers;J. Mellinger;M.A. Jordan

  • A novel P300-based brain-computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: moving beyond rows and columns

    G. Townsend;B.K. LaPallo;C.B. Boulay;D.J. Krusienski

  • A P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance.

    Eric W. Sellers;Dean J. Krusienski;Dennis J. McFarland;Theresa M. Vaughan

  • A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use

    Eric W Sellers;Theresa M Vaughan;Jonathan R Wolpaw

  • P300 brain computer interface: current challenges and emerging trends

    Reza Fazel-Rezai;Brendan Z. Allison;Christoph Guger;Eric W. Sellers

  • The wadsworth BCI research and development program: at home with BCI

    T.M. Vaughan;D.J. McFarland;G. Schalk;W.A. Sarnacki

  • Toward A High-Throughput Auditory P300-based Brain-Computer Interface

    Daniela Klobassa;Daniela Klobassa;Theresa M. Vaughan;P. Brunner;N.E. Schwartz

  • Brain-computer interface research at the university of south Florida cognitive psychophysiology laboratory: the P300 speller

    E.W. Sellers;A. Kubler;E. Donchin

  • An adaptive P300-based control system.

    Jing Jin;Brendan Zachary Allison;Eric Sellers;Clemens Brunner

  • Independent home use of a brain-computer interface by people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Jonathan R. Wolpaw;Richard S. Bedlack;Domenic J. Reda;Robert J. Ringer

  • P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) event-related potentials (ERPs): People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) vs. age-matched controls

    Lynn M. McCane;Susan M. Heckman;Dennis J. McFarland;George Townsend

  • Predictive Spelling With a P300-Based Brain–Computer Interface: Increasing the Rate of Communication

    David B. Ryan;G. E. Frye;G. Townsend;D. R. Berry

  • A P300 brain-computer interface based on a modification of the mismatch negativity paradigm.

    Jing Jin;Eric W Sellers;Sijie Zhou;Yu Zhang

  • Noninvasive brain-computer interface enables communication after brainstem stroke

    Eric W. Sellers;David B. Ryan;Christopher K. Hauser;Christopher K. Hauser

  • Brain-computer interface (BCI) evaluation in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Lynn M. McCane;Eric W. Sellers;Dennis J. McFarland;Joseph N. Mak

  • EEG correlates of P300-based brain–computer interface (BCI) performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Joseph N Mak;Dennis J McFarland;Theresa M Vaughan;Lynn M McCane

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan R. Wolpaw
Jonathan R. Wolpaw National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies
Dean J. Krusienski
Dean J. Krusienski Old Dominion University
Dennis J. McFarland
Dennis J. McFarland Wadsworth Center
Leslie M. Collins
Leslie M. Collins Duke University
Jing Jin
Jing Jin East China University of Science and Technology
Xingyu Wang
Xingyu Wang East China University of Science and Technology
Emanuel Donchin
Emanuel Donchin University of South Florida
Andrea Kübler
Andrea Kübler University of Würzburg
Christa Neuper
Christa Neuper University of Graz
Brendan Z. Allison
Brendan Z. Allison University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider related fields and flexible learning options. Today, a range of online certifications can complement neuroscience degrees and broaden your career prospects. These credentials can boost employability in both clinical and research roles, and many can be completed in less time than traditional degrees.

If you're seeking less rigorous options that still provide value, consider browsing some of the easiest online degrees and majors. These programs are ideal for students who need flexibility or want to build foundational knowledge before specializing.

For those drawn to social and behavioral neuroscience, pursuing an online MSW (Master of Social Work) can open doors to counseling, advocacy, or therapy-related careers. Some professionals might also consider bcba certification programs online, which prepare graduates for applied behavior analysis roles—an area closely linked to neuroscience and psychology.

No matter your interests, these pathways provide affordable, flexible routes to meaningful careers, allowing you to tailor your education as you shape your future in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Eric W. Sellers

Trending Scientists