World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
11365
World Ranking
9976
National Ranking
4202

Dean J. Krusienski publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean J. Krusienski sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 125 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dean J. Krusienski D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean J. Krusienski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dean J. Krusienski is affiliated with Old Dominion University in the United States and specializes in neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, electrical and electronic engineering, and related subfields. Their research addresses various aspects of brain function and neural activity, particularly emphasizing the interface between neural signals and computational systems.

The scientist's primary areas of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Signal Processing
  • Artificial Intelligence

Dean J. Krusienski's work encompasses several main research topics as well:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception

Frequent collaborators of Dean J. Krusienski include Christian Herff, Tanja Schultz, Jerry J. Shih, Pieter Kubben, and Pedram Z. Soroush. These coauthors have contributed to multiple publications together, suggesting ongoing research partnerships within the neuroscientific community.

The following is a selection of recent papers by Dean J. Krusienski and colleagues, showing the range and focus of their published research:

  • The Potential of Stereotactic-EEG for Brain-Computer Interfaces: Current Progress and Future Directions, 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Real-time synthesis of imagined speech processes from minimally invasive recordings of neural activity, 2021, Communications Biology
  • Editorial: Brain-Computer Interfaces and Augmented/Virtual Reality, 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • The nested hierarchy of overt, mouthed, and imagined speech activity evident in intracranial recordings, 2023, NeuroImage
  • Prefrontal High Gamma in ECoG Tags Periodicity of Musical Rhythms in Perception and Imagination, 2020, eNeuro

Dean J. Krusienski has frequently published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Neuroscience, the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Brain-Computer Interfaces journal, and SLEEP. Their work reflects a multidisciplinary approach combining neuroscience, engineering, and computational methods to investigate brain-computer interfaces and neural processes.

Best Publications

  • The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems

    B. Blankertz;K.-R. Muller;D.J. Krusienski;G. Schalk

  • A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller

    Dean J Krusienski;Eric W Sellers;François Cabestaing;Sabri Bayoudh

  • Toward enhanced P300 speller performance

    D.J. Krusienski;E.W. Sellers;D.J. McFarland;T.M. Vaughan

  • Brain-Computer Interfaces in Medicine

    Jerry J. Shih;Dean J. Krusienski;Johnathan R. Wolpaw

  • A P300-based brain–computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    F. Nijboer;E.W. Sellers;J. Mellinger;M.A. Jordan

  • A novel P300-based brain-computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: moving beyond rows and columns

    G. Townsend;B.K. LaPallo;C.B. Boulay;D.J. Krusienski

  • A P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance.

    Eric W. Sellers;Dean J. Krusienski;Dennis J. McFarland;Theresa M. Vaughan

  • An auditory oddball (P300) spelling system for brain‐computer interfaces

    A. Furdea;S. Halder;D.J. Krusienski;D. Bross

  • The wadsworth BCI research and development program: at home with BCI

    T.M. Vaughan;D.J. McFarland;G. Schalk;W.A. Sarnacki

  • BCI meeting 2005-workshop on BCI signal processing: feature extraction and translation

    D.J. McFarland;C.W. Anderson;K.-R. Muller;A. Schlogl

  • Emulation of computer mouse control with a noninvasive brain-computer interface.

    Dennis J McFarland;Dean J Krusienski;William A Sarnacki;Jonathan R Wolpaw

  • Direct classification of all American English phonemes using signals from functional speech motor cortex

    Emily M Mugler;James L Patton;Robert D Flint;Zachary A Wright

  • Critical issues in state-of-the-art brain–computer interface signal processing

    Dean J Krusienski;Moritz Grosse-Wentrup;Ferran Galán;Damien Coyle

  • Speech synthesis from ECoG using densely connected 3D convolutional neural networks

    Miguel Angrick;Christian Herff;Christian Herff;Emily Mugler;Matthew C Tate

  • Biosignal-Based Spoken Communication: A Survey

    Tanja Schultz;Michael Wand;Thomas Hueber;Dean J. Krusienski

  • Discriminative Feature Extraction via Multivariate Linear Regression for SSVEP-Based BCI

    Haiqiang Wang;Yu Zhang;Nicholas R. Waytowich;Dean J. Krusienski

  • Improved signal processing approaches in an offline simulation of a hybrid brain–computer interface

    Clemens Brunner;Brendan Zachary Allison;Dean J. Krusienski;Vera Kaiser

  • Design and performance of adaptive systems based on structured stochastic optimization strategies

    D.J. Krusienski;W.K. Jenkins

  • Generating Natural, Intelligible Speech From Brain Activity in Motor, Premotor, and Inferior Frontal Cortices.

    Christian Herff;Lorenz Diener;Miguel Angrick;Emily M. Mugler

  • The Potential of Stereotactic-EEG for Brain-Computer Interfaces: Current Progress and Future Directions.

    Christian Herff;Dean J. Krusienski;Pieter Kubben

  • Brain-computer interface signal processing at the Wadsworth Center: mu and sensorimotor beta rhythms.

    Dennis J McFarland;Dean J Krusienski;Jonathan R Wolpaw

  • Particle swarm optimization for adaptive IIR filter structures

    D.J. Krusienski;W.K. Jenkins

  • A $\mu $ -Rhythm Matched Filter for Continuous Control of a Brain-Computer Interface

    D.J. Krusienski;G. Schalk;D.J. McFarland;J.R. Wolpaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Tanja Schultz
Tanja Schultz University of Bremen
Jonathan R. Wolpaw
Jonathan R. Wolpaw National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies
Dennis J. McFarland
Dennis J. McFarland Wadsworth Center
Eric W. Sellers
Eric W. Sellers East Tennessee State University
Gerwin Schalk
Gerwin Schalk Sichuan University
Brendan Z. Allison
Brendan Z. Allison University of California, San Diego
Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
Peter Brunner
Peter Brunner Washington University in St. Louis
Andrea Kübler
Andrea Kübler University of Würzburg
Daniel W. Moran
Daniel W. Moran Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related online degrees and career pathways. For those interested in data analysis and AI, a data science degree can lead to roles in government, finance, technology, or healthcare. This field is rapidly growing and offers strong salary potential.

Engineering-minded students may consider an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering. Online programs blend flexibility with the technical rigor required for careers in hardware, robotics, and communications.

For a faster track into the workforce, short certificate programs that pay well are worth considering. These certifications can prepare you for entry-level tech roles and help build specific skill sets in a matter of months.

Already have a bachelor’s degree? Consider the shortest masters degree options available online. Accelerated master’s programs let you level up your qualifications quickly and can lead to better job prospects or leadership roles in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Dean J. Krusienski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles