World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 38 9976 9692 4202 4028 125 11365

Dean J. Krusienski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dean J. Krusienski between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dean J. Krusienski published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2019. 8 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2019. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
2001 2026

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dean J. Krusienski: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 2
2004 4
2005 4
2006 10
2007 7
2008 5
2009 7
2010 5
2011 7
2012 6
2013 5
2014 5
2015 7
2016 9
2017 6
2018 7
2019 14
2020 8
2021 4
2022 10
2023 4
2024 4
2025 7
2026 1
Total 151
Download as CSV

Dean J. Krusienski publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean J. Krusienski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 122–131 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 125 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544 125
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Dean J. Krusienski D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean J. Krusienski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 38
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dean J. Krusienski is affiliated with Old Dominion University in the United States and specializes in neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, electrical and electronic engineering, and related subfields. Their research addresses various aspects of brain function and neural activity, particularly emphasizing the interface between neural signals and computational systems.

The scientist's primary areas of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Signal Processing
  • Artificial Intelligence

Dean J. Krusienski's work encompasses several main research topics as well:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception

Frequent collaborators of Dean J. Krusienski include Christian Herff, Tanja Schultz, Jerry J. Shih, Pieter Kubben, and Pedram Z. Soroush. These coauthors have contributed to multiple publications together, suggesting ongoing research partnerships within the neuroscientific community.

The following is a selection of recent papers by Dean J. Krusienski and colleagues, showing the range and focus of their published research:

  • The Potential of Stereotactic-EEG for Brain-Computer Interfaces: Current Progress and Future Directions, 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Real-time synthesis of imagined speech processes from minimally invasive recordings of neural activity, 2021, Communications Biology
  • Editorial: Brain-Computer Interfaces and Augmented/Virtual Reality, 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • The nested hierarchy of overt, mouthed, and imagined speech activity evident in intracranial recordings, 2023, NeuroImage
  • Prefrontal High Gamma in ECoG Tags Periodicity of Musical Rhythms in Perception and Imagination, 2020, eNeuro

Dean J. Krusienski has frequently published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Neuroscience, the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Brain-Computer Interfaces journal, and SLEEP. Their work reflects a multidisciplinary approach combining neuroscience, engineering, and computational methods to investigate brain-computer interfaces and neural processes.

Best Publications

  • The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems

    B. Blankertz;K.-R. Muller;D.J. Krusienski;G. Schalk

  • A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller

    Dean J Krusienski;Eric W Sellers;François Cabestaing;Sabri Bayoudh

  • Toward enhanced P300 speller performance

    D.J. Krusienski;E.W. Sellers;D.J. McFarland;T.M. Vaughan

  • Brain-Computer Interfaces in Medicine

    Jerry J. Shih;Dean J. Krusienski;Johnathan R. Wolpaw

  • A P300-based brain–computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    F. Nijboer;E.W. Sellers;J. Mellinger;M.A. Jordan

  • A novel P300-based brain-computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: moving beyond rows and columns

    G. Townsend;B.K. LaPallo;C.B. Boulay;D.J. Krusienski

  • A P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance.

    Eric W. Sellers;Dean J. Krusienski;Dennis J. McFarland;Theresa M. Vaughan

  • An auditory oddball (P300) spelling system for brain‐computer interfaces

    A. Furdea;S. Halder;D.J. Krusienski;D. Bross

  • The wadsworth BCI research and development program: at home with BCI

    T.M. Vaughan;D.J. McFarland;G. Schalk;W.A. Sarnacki

  • BCI meeting 2005-workshop on BCI signal processing: feature extraction and translation

    D.J. McFarland;C.W. Anderson;K.-R. Muller;A. Schlogl

  • Emulation of computer mouse control with a noninvasive brain-computer interface.

    Dennis J McFarland;Dean J Krusienski;William A Sarnacki;Jonathan R Wolpaw

  • Direct classification of all American English phonemes using signals from functional speech motor cortex

    Emily M Mugler;James L Patton;Robert D Flint;Zachary A Wright

  • Critical issues in state-of-the-art brain–computer interface signal processing

    Dean J Krusienski;Moritz Grosse-Wentrup;Ferran Galán;Damien Coyle

  • Speech synthesis from ECoG using densely connected 3D convolutional neural networks

    Miguel Angrick;Christian Herff;Christian Herff;Emily Mugler;Matthew C Tate

  • Biosignal-Based Spoken Communication: A Survey

    Tanja Schultz;Michael Wand;Thomas Hueber;Dean J. Krusienski

  • Discriminative Feature Extraction via Multivariate Linear Regression for SSVEP-Based BCI

    Haiqiang Wang;Yu Zhang;Nicholas R. Waytowich;Dean J. Krusienski

  • Improved signal processing approaches in an offline simulation of a hybrid brain–computer interface

    Clemens Brunner;Brendan Zachary Allison;Dean J. Krusienski;Vera Kaiser

  • Design and performance of adaptive systems based on structured stochastic optimization strategies

    D.J. Krusienski;W.K. Jenkins

  • Generating Natural, Intelligible Speech From Brain Activity in Motor, Premotor, and Inferior Frontal Cortices.

    Christian Herff;Lorenz Diener;Miguel Angrick;Emily M. Mugler

  • The Potential of Stereotactic-EEG for Brain-Computer Interfaces: Current Progress and Future Directions.

    Christian Herff;Dean J. Krusienski;Pieter Kubben

  • Brain-computer interface signal processing at the Wadsworth Center: mu and sensorimotor beta rhythms.

    Dennis J McFarland;Dean J Krusienski;Jonathan R Wolpaw

  • Particle swarm optimization for adaptive IIR filter structures

    D.J. Krusienski;W.K. Jenkins

  • A $\mu $ -Rhythm Matched Filter for Continuous Control of a Brain-Computer Interface

    D.J. Krusienski;G. Schalk;D.J. McFarland;J.R. Wolpaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Tanja Schultz
Tanja Schultz University of Bremen
Jonathan R. Wolpaw
Jonathan R. Wolpaw National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies
Dennis J. McFarland
Dennis J. McFarland Wadsworth Center
Eric W. Sellers
Eric W. Sellers East Tennessee State University
Gerwin Schalk
Gerwin Schalk Sichuan University
Brendan Z. Allison
Brendan Z. Allison University of California, San Diego
Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
Peter Brunner
Peter Brunner Washington University in St. Louis
Andrea Kübler
Andrea Kübler University of Würzburg
Daniel W. Moran
Daniel W. Moran Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related online degrees and career pathways. For those interested in data analysis and AI, a data science degree can lead to roles in government, finance, technology, or healthcare. This field is rapidly growing and offers strong salary potential.

Engineering-minded students may consider an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering. Online programs blend flexibility with the technical rigor required for careers in hardware, robotics, and communications.

For a faster track into the workforce, short certificate programs that pay well are worth considering. These certifications can prepare you for entry-level tech roles and help build specific skill sets in a matter of months.

Already have a bachelor’s degree? Consider the shortest masters degree options available online. Accelerated master’s programs let you level up your qualifications quickly and can lead to better job prospects or leadership roles in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Dean J. Krusienski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles