World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Leslie M. Collins

Leslie M. Collins

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
6688
World Ranking
9313
National Ranking
3958

Leslie M. Collins publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leslie M. Collins sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 381 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Leslie M. Collins D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leslie M. Collins sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leslie M. Collins is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within computer science, with particular attention to computer vision, artificial intelligence, biomedical engineering, and cognitive neuroscience. The scientist's publication record indicates work spanning signal processing, neural network applications, and biomedical topics.

The main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

Subfields explored by Leslie include:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Signal Processing
  • Biomedical Engineering

Frequent publication venues associated with this researcher feature a distribution across diverse scientific outlets, emphasizing both AI-focused and biomedical domains:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • Cochlear Implants International

The scientist's research topics encompass a range of technical and biomedical themes:

  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
  • Remote-Sensing Image Classification

Recent papers published by Leslie M. Collins demonstrate a focus on both biomedical engineering and remote sensing applications:

  • GridTracer: Automatic Mapping of Power Grids Using Deep Learning and Overhead Imagery, 2021, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
  • Heart Sound Analysis in Individuals Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Devices, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
  • Parameter tuning of time-frequency masking algorithms for reverberant artifact removal within the cochlear implant stimulus, 2022, Cochlear Implants International
  • Transformers For Recognition In Overhead Imagery: A Reality Check, 2023, 2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
  • Deep Learning Resolves Myovascular Dynamics in the Failing Human Heart, 2024, JACC Basic to Translational Science

Collaboration records indicate frequent co-authorship with several researchers including:

  • Boyla O. Mainsah
  • Jordan M. Malof
  • Ravi Karra
  • Xinlin J. Chen
  • Francesco Luzi

Best Publications

  • Distributed solar photovoltaic array location and extent dataset for remote sensing object identification.

    Kyle Bradbury;Raghav Saboo;Timothy L. Johnson;Jordan M. Malof

  • Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Landmine Detection in Ground-Penetrating Radar Data

    Peter A. Torrione;Kenneth D. Morton;Rayn Sakaguchi;Leslie M. Collins

  • Sensing of unexploded ordnance with magnetometer and induction data: theory and signal processing

    Yan Zhang;L. Collins;Haitao Yu;C.E. Baum

  • Automatic detection of solar photovoltaic arrays in high resolution aerial imagery

    Jordan M. Malof;Kyle Bradbury;Leslie M. Collins;Richard G. Newell

  • Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects.

    Terry A. Zwolan;Leslie M. Collins;Leslie M. Collins;Gregory H. Wakefield

  • Classification of landmine-like metal targets using wideband electromagnetic induction

    Ping Gao;L. Collins;P.M. Garber;N. Geng

  • Performance of an adaptive feature-based processor for a wideband ground penetrating radar system

    P.A. Torrione;C.S. Throckmorton;L.M. Collins

  • Financial fraud detection using vocal, linguistic and financial cues

    Chandra S. Throckmorton;William J. Mayew;Mohan Venkatachalam;Leslie M. Collins

  • Two-dimensional and three-dimensional NUFFT migration method for landmine detection using ground-penetrating Radar

    Jiayu Song;Qing Huo Liu;P. Torrione;L. Collins

  • Time-domain sensing of targets buried under a rough air-ground interface

    T. Dogaru;L. Carin

  • COMPARISON OF ELECTRODE DISCRIMINATION, PITCH RANKING, AND PITCH SCALING DATA IN POSTLINGUALLY DEAFENED ADULT COCHLEAR IMPLANT SUBJECTS

    Leslie M. Collins;Teresa A. Zwolan;Gregory H. Wakefield

  • Discrimination mode processing for EMI and GPR sensors for hand-held land mine detection

    K.C. Ho;L.M. Collins;L.G. Huettel;P.D. Gader

  • An improved Bayesian decision theoretic approach for land mine detection

    L. Collins;Ping Gao;L. Carin

  • Texture Features for Antitank Landmine Detection Using Ground Penetrating Radar

    P. Torrione;L.M. Collins

  • Application of feature extraction methods for landmine detection using the Wichmann/Niitek ground-penetrating radar

    Quan Zhu;L.M. Collins

  • Investigation of the effects of temporal and spatial interactions on speech-recognition skills in cochlear-implant subjects

    Chandra S. Throckmorton;Leslie M. Collins

  • Large-Scale Semantic Classification: Outcome of the First Year of Inria Aerial Image Labeling Benchmark

    Bohao Huang;Kangkang Lu;Nicolas Audeberr;Andrew Khalel

  • A comparison of the performance of statistical and fuzzy algorithms for unexploded ordnance detection

    L.M. Collins;Yan Zhang;Jing Li;Hua Wang

  • Automatic solar photovoltaic panel detection in satellite imagery

    Jordan M. Malof;Rui Hou;Leslie M. Collins;Kyle Bradbury

  • A comparison of algorithms for subsurface target detection and identification using time-domain electromagnetic induction data

    S.L. Tantum;L.M. Collins

  • Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy-based geochemical fingerprinting for the rapid analysis and discrimination of minerals: The example of garnet

    Daniel C. Alvey;Kenneth Morton;Russell S. Harmon;Jennifer L. Gottfried

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence Carin
Lawrence Carin Duke University
Eric W. Sellers
Eric W. Sellers East Tennessee State University
Jungsang Kim
Jungsang Kim Duke University
Russell S. Harmon
Russell S. Harmon North Carolina State University
Steven A. Cummer
Steven A. Cummer Duke University
Paul D. Gader
Paul D. Gader University of Florida
Romit Roy Choudhury
Romit Roy Choudhury University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Rebecca Willett
Rebecca Willett University of Chicago
Nan Marie Jokerst
Nan Marie Jokerst Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online options can be an excellent way to advance your education in computer science or related fields. If your academic record is a concern, finding a college with low gpa requirements may help you start your journey, offering flexible admissions and support for students from all backgrounds.

Accelerated degree programs can help you complete your studies faster and join the workforce sooner. Consider an accelerated computer science degree if you’re looking to gain technical skills efficiently. These online degrees often provide specialized tracks and practical learning experiences designed to match current industry demands.

Looking to branch out? Careers in environmental science and engineering are in demand, especially if you have a passion for sustainability and innovation. Discover what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree or pursue an environmental engineer degree online for a flexible path into an impactful career.

Choosing the right online degree can offer new career pathways, flexibility, and accessibility—making higher education more achievable than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Leslie M. Collins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles