World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
18141
World Ranking
19193
National Ranking
1008

Martin Stangel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Stangel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 425 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martin Stangel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Stangel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Stangel is affiliated with Hannover Medical School in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, focusing primarily on neurology and related subfields. They have published 144 works in the broader domain of medicine, with significant emphasis on neurology, pathology and forensic medicine, immunology, oncology, and molecular biology.

Their research concentrates on several main topics, including:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Interferon and immune responses

Martin Stangel has published in multiple prominent journals and venues, reflecting the breadth of their work. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation (5 publications)
  • Cells (4 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (4 publications)
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation (3 publications)
  • Neurological Research and Practice (3 publications)

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Martin Stangel are:

  • "Cerebrospinal fluid findings in COVID-19: a multicenter study of 150 lumbar punctures in 127 patients," 2022, Journal of Neuroinflammation
  • "Clinical implications of serum neurofilament in newly diagnosed MS patients: A longitudinal multicentre cohort study," 2020, EBioMedicine
  • "Astrocyte-oligodendrocyte interaction regulates central nervous system regeneration," 2023, Nature Communications
  • "Complete Epstein-Barr virus seropositivity in a large cohort of patients with early multiple sclerosis," 2020, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • "Sunlight exposure exerts immunomodulatory effects to reduce multiple sclerosis severity," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors who have contributed to their research output. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Thomas Skripuletz (40 collaborations)
  • Stefan Gingele (20 collaborations)
  • Kurt-Wolfram Sühs (18 collaborations)
  • Nora Möhn (17 collaborations)
  • Hayrettin Tumani (15 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: A multicentre study of 175 patients

    Sven Jarius;Klemens Ruprecht;Brigitte Wildemann;Tania Kuempfel

  • Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study

    James F Howard;Kimiaki Utsugisawa;Michael Benatar;Hiroyuki Murai

  • Neuromyelitis optica: Evaluation of 871 attacks and 1,153 treatment courses.

    Ingo Kleiter;Anna Gahlen;Nadja Borisow;Katrin Fischer

  • Astrocytes regulate myelin clearance through recruitment of microglia during cuprizone-induced demyelination

    Thomas Skripuletz;Diane Hackstette;Katharina Bauer;Viktoria Gudi

  • Glial response during cuprizone-induced de- and remyelination in the CNS: lessons learned

    Viktoria Gudi;Stefan Gingele;Thomas Skripuletz;Martin Stangel

  • Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for maintenance treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (PATH): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    Ivo N van Schaik;Vera Bril;Nan van Geloven;Hans-Peter Hartung

  • Cortical Demyelination Is Prominent in the Murine Cuprizone Model and Is Strain-Dependent

    Thomas Skripuletz;Maren Lindner;Alexandra Kotsiari;Niklas Garde

  • The utility of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in patients with multiple sclerosis

    Martin Stangel;Sten Fredrikson;Edgar Meinl;Axel Petzold;Axel Petzold

  • Regional differences between grey and white matter in cuprizone induced demyelination

    Viktoria Gudi;Darius Moharregh-Khiabani;Thomas Skripuletz;Paraskevi N. Koutsoudaki

  • De- and remyelination in the CNS white and grey matter induced by cuprizone: the old, the new, and the unexpected.

    Thomas Skripuletz;Viktoria Gudi;Diane Hackstette;Martin Stangel

  • Apheresis therapies for NMOSD attacks: A retrospective study of 207 therapeutic interventions

    Ingo Kleiter;Anna Gahlen;Nadja Borisow;Katrin Fischer

  • Sequential myelin protein expression during remyelination reveals fast and efficient repair after central nervous system demyelination

    M. Lindner;S. Heine;K. Haastert;N. Garde

  • Characterisation of microglia during de- and remyelination: can they create a repair promoting environment?

    Elke Verena Voß;Jelena Škuljec;Viktoria Gudi;Thomas Skripuletz

  • Towards the implementation of ‘no evidence of disease activity’ in multiple sclerosis treatment: the multiple sclerosis decision model

    Martin Stangel;Iris Katharina Penner;Boris A. Kallmann;Carsten Lukas

  • Remyelinating strategies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

    Martin Stangel;Hans-Peter Hartung

  • Fumaric acid and its esters: an emerging treatment for multiple sclerosis with antioxidative mechanism of action.

    R. Gold;R.A. Linker;M. Stangel

  • Longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis—it's not all neuromyelitis optica

    Corinna Trebst;Peter Raab;Elke Verena Voss;Paulus Rommer

  • Drug Insight: the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in neurology--therapeutic considerations and practical issues.

    Ralf Gold;Martin Stangel;Marinos C Dalakas

  • Fumaric Acid and its esters: an emerging treatment for multiple sclerosis.

    D Moharregh-Khiabani;R A Linker;R Gold;M Stangel

  • Chronic toxic demyelination in the central nervous system leads to axonal damage despite remyelination.

    Maren Lindner;Jantje Fokuhl;Franziska Linsmeier;Corinna Trebst

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralf Gold
Ralf Gold Ruhr University Bochum
Hayrettin Tumani
Hayrettin Tumani University of Ulm
Heinz Wiendl
Heinz Wiendl University of Münster
Frauke Zipp
Frauke Zipp Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Brigitte Wildemann
Brigitte Wildemann University Hospital Heidelberg
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann University of Tübingen
Hans-Peter Hartung
Hans-Peter Hartung Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Sven G. Meuth
Sven G. Meuth University of Münster
Bernhard Hemmer
Bernhard Hemmer Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The pathway to becoming a medical professional is evolving, with many choosing alternative or complementary healthcare degrees that offer flexibility and promising job prospects. For those interested in nursing, exploring the easiest nursing programs to get into can be a practical strategy, especially for students seeking less competitive entry requirements.

Accelerated nursing tracks—such as absn programs that don't require teas—allow career changers or those with a prior degree to transition into nursing without standardized exam hurdles. For students leaning toward non-clinical roles in the healthcare sector, administrative routes are highly accessible through online health administration programs, which are ideal for remote learners and working professionals.

Additionally, programs in medical billing and coding are increasingly popular and widely available online. Prospective students can explore financial aid for medical billing and coding to reduce tuition burden and start a healthcare career with less debt. Each of these pathways offers flexibility and diverse entry points into the expanding field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Stangel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles