World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 75 19192 18021 1009 967 425 18141

Martin Stangel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Stangel between 1989 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Stangel published across 38 years, from 1989 to 2026, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2021. 4 of the 450 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2021. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 7 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 38 publications 2021: 47 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 2 publications
1989 2026

450 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Stangel: publications per year, 1989 to 2026
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 1
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 7
1998 3
1999 3
2000 3
2001 3
2002 7
2003 6
2004 5
2005 4
2006 14
2007 6
2008 12
2009 17
2010 10
2011 19
2012 20
2013 24
2014 26
2015 30
2016 28
2017 22
2018 32
2019 30
2020 38
2021 47
2022 8
2023 10
2024 3
2025 2
2026 2
Total 450
Download as CSV

Martin Stangel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Stangel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 425 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 425
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Stangel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Stangel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574 75
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Stangel is affiliated with Hannover Medical School in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, focusing primarily on neurology and related subfields. They have published 144 works in the broader domain of medicine, with significant emphasis on neurology, pathology and forensic medicine, immunology, oncology, and molecular biology.

Their research concentrates on several main topics, including:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Interferon and immune responses

Martin Stangel has published in multiple prominent journals and venues, reflecting the breadth of their work. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation (5 publications)
  • Cells (4 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (4 publications)
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation (3 publications)
  • Neurological Research and Practice (3 publications)

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Martin Stangel are:

  • "Cerebrospinal fluid findings in COVID-19: a multicenter study of 150 lumbar punctures in 127 patients," 2022, Journal of Neuroinflammation
  • "Clinical implications of serum neurofilament in newly diagnosed MS patients: A longitudinal multicentre cohort study," 2020, EBioMedicine
  • "Astrocyte-oligodendrocyte interaction regulates central nervous system regeneration," 2023, Nature Communications
  • "Complete Epstein-Barr virus seropositivity in a large cohort of patients with early multiple sclerosis," 2020, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • "Sunlight exposure exerts immunomodulatory effects to reduce multiple sclerosis severity," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors who have contributed to their research output. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Thomas Skripuletz (40 collaborations)
  • Stefan Gingele (20 collaborations)
  • Kurt-Wolfram Sühs (18 collaborations)
  • Nora Möhn (17 collaborations)
  • Hayrettin Tumani (15 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: A multicentre study of 175 patients

    Sven Jarius;Klemens Ruprecht;Brigitte Wildemann;Tania Kuempfel

  • Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study

    James F Howard;Kimiaki Utsugisawa;Michael Benatar;Hiroyuki Murai

  • Neuromyelitis optica: Evaluation of 871 attacks and 1,153 treatment courses.

    Ingo Kleiter;Anna Gahlen;Nadja Borisow;Katrin Fischer

  • Astrocytes regulate myelin clearance through recruitment of microglia during cuprizone-induced demyelination

    Thomas Skripuletz;Diane Hackstette;Katharina Bauer;Viktoria Gudi

  • Glial response during cuprizone-induced de- and remyelination in the CNS: lessons learned

    Viktoria Gudi;Stefan Gingele;Thomas Skripuletz;Martin Stangel

  • Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for maintenance treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (PATH): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    Ivo N van Schaik;Vera Bril;Nan van Geloven;Hans-Peter Hartung

  • Cortical Demyelination Is Prominent in the Murine Cuprizone Model and Is Strain-Dependent

    Thomas Skripuletz;Maren Lindner;Alexandra Kotsiari;Niklas Garde

  • The utility of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in patients with multiple sclerosis

    Martin Stangel;Sten Fredrikson;Edgar Meinl;Axel Petzold;Axel Petzold

  • Regional differences between grey and white matter in cuprizone induced demyelination

    Viktoria Gudi;Darius Moharregh-Khiabani;Thomas Skripuletz;Paraskevi N. Koutsoudaki

  • De- and remyelination in the CNS white and grey matter induced by cuprizone: the old, the new, and the unexpected.

    Thomas Skripuletz;Viktoria Gudi;Diane Hackstette;Martin Stangel

  • Apheresis therapies for NMOSD attacks: A retrospective study of 207 therapeutic interventions

    Ingo Kleiter;Anna Gahlen;Nadja Borisow;Katrin Fischer

  • Sequential myelin protein expression during remyelination reveals fast and efficient repair after central nervous system demyelination

    M. Lindner;S. Heine;K. Haastert;N. Garde

  • Characterisation of microglia during de- and remyelination: can they create a repair promoting environment?

    Elke Verena Voß;Jelena Škuljec;Viktoria Gudi;Thomas Skripuletz

  • Towards the implementation of ‘no evidence of disease activity’ in multiple sclerosis treatment: the multiple sclerosis decision model

    Martin Stangel;Iris Katharina Penner;Boris A. Kallmann;Carsten Lukas

  • Remyelinating strategies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

    Martin Stangel;Hans-Peter Hartung

  • Fumaric acid and its esters: an emerging treatment for multiple sclerosis with antioxidative mechanism of action.

    R. Gold;R.A. Linker;M. Stangel

  • Longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis—it's not all neuromyelitis optica

    Corinna Trebst;Peter Raab;Elke Verena Voss;Paulus Rommer

  • Drug Insight: the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in neurology--therapeutic considerations and practical issues.

    Ralf Gold;Martin Stangel;Marinos C Dalakas

  • Fumaric Acid and its esters: an emerging treatment for multiple sclerosis.

    D Moharregh-Khiabani;R A Linker;R Gold;M Stangel

  • Chronic toxic demyelination in the central nervous system leads to axonal damage despite remyelination.

    Maren Lindner;Jantje Fokuhl;Franziska Linsmeier;Corinna Trebst

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralf Gold
Ralf Gold Ruhr University Bochum
Hayrettin Tumani
Hayrettin Tumani University of Ulm
Heinz Wiendl
Heinz Wiendl University of Münster
Frauke Zipp
Frauke Zipp Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Brigitte Wildemann
Brigitte Wildemann University Hospital Heidelberg
Friedemann Paul
Friedemann Paul Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann University of Tübingen
Hans-Peter Hartung
Hans-Peter Hartung Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Sven G. Meuth
Sven G. Meuth University of Münster
Bernhard Hemmer
Bernhard Hemmer Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The pathway to becoming a medical professional is evolving, with many choosing alternative or complementary healthcare degrees that offer flexibility and promising job prospects. For those interested in nursing, exploring the easiest nursing programs to get into can be a practical strategy, especially for students seeking less competitive entry requirements.

Accelerated nursing tracks—such as absn programs that don't require teas—allow career changers or those with a prior degree to transition into nursing without standardized exam hurdles. For students leaning toward non-clinical roles in the healthcare sector, administrative routes are highly accessible through online health administration programs, which are ideal for remote learners and working professionals.

Additionally, programs in medical billing and coding are increasingly popular and widely available online. Prospective students can explore financial aid for medical billing and coding to reduce tuition burden and start a healthcare career with less debt. Each of these pathways offers flexibility and diverse entry points into the expanding field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Stangel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles