World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 13332 12547 146 138 338 23667

Morten Grønbæk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Morten Grønbæk between 1988 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Morten Grønbæk published across 37 years, from 1988 to 2024, averaging 12.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2013. 6 of the 478 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2013. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 30 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 37 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 43 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications
1988 2024

478 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Morten Grønbæk: publications per year, 1988 to 2024
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 3
1995 4
1996 3
1997 5
1998 7
1999 9
2000 8
2001 11
2002 13
2003 16
2004 18
2005 24
2006 30
2007 28
2008 37
2009 25
2010 25
2011 31
2012 28
2013 43
2014 41
2015 30
2016 4
2017 8
2018 4
2019 2
2020 3
2021 5
2022 4
2023 4
2024 2
Total 478
Download as CSV

Morten Grønbæk publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morten Grønbæk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 338 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 338
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Morten Grønbæk D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morten Grønbæk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Morten Grønbæk is affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark in Denmark. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and health professions, with a significant number of publications contributing to these fields. The scientist's work spans several subfields, including general health professions, pathology and forensic medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their research covers diverse topics, with notable emphasis on alcohol consumption and health effects, COVID-19 and mental health, liver disease diagnosis and treatment, employment and welfare studies, workplace health and well-being, as well as obesity, physical activity, and diet. These topics highlight the broad scope of their investigations into health outcomes and preventive measures.

Recent publications by Morten Grønbæk include:

  • Decreasing mental well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study among Danes before and during the pandemic, 2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Cardiac rehabilitation for patients with heart failure: association with readmission and mortality risk, 2021, European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
  • A literature review of evidence for primary prevention of overweight and obesity in healthy weight children and adolescents: A report produced by a working group of the Danish Council on Health and Disease Prevention, 2023, Obesity Reviews
  • Changes in mental well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study among Danes from 2019 to 2021, 2023, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Alcohol and risk of non-traumatic bleeding events requiring hospital care in the general population: A prospective cohort study, 2020, Alcohol

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Morten Grønbæk include Lau Caspar Thygesen, Janne Schurmann Tolstrup, Ola Ekholm, Sanne Pagh Møller, and Annette Kjær Ersbøll. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications, particularly in areas intersecting public health and clinical outcomes.

The scientist's work has appeared in several publication venues repeatedly, reflecting their ongoing contributions to specific journals. These venues include:

  • Drugs and Alcohol Today
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • European Journal of Public Health
  • Obesity Reviews
  • European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes

Best Publications

  • Prediction of risk of liver disease by alcohol intake, sex, and age: A prospective population study

    Ulrik Becker;Allan Deis;Thorkild I.A. Sørensen;Morten Grønbæk

  • Mortality associated with moderate intakes of wine, beer, or spirits.

    Morten Gronbaek;Allan Deis;Thorkild I A Sorensen;Ulrik Becker

  • Type of Alcohol Consumed and Mortality from All Causes, Coronary Heart Disease, and Cancer

    Morten Grønbæk;Ulrik Becker;Ditte Johansen;Adam Gottschau

  • Wine intake and diet in a random sample of 48763 Danish men and women

    Anne Tjønneland;Morten Grønbæk;Connie Stripp;Kim Overvad

  • INTAKES OF WHOLE GRAINS, BRAN, AND GERM AND THE RISK OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE IN MEN

    Majken K Jensen;Pauline Koh-Banerjee;Frank B Hu;Mary Franz

  • Amount and type of alcohol and risk of dementia: the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

    Thomas Truelsen;Dorte Thudium;Morten Grønbæk

  • Fish consumption and coronary heart disease mortality. A systematic review of prospective cohort studies

    P Marckmann;M Grønbæk

  • Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in Men and Women The Copenhagen City Heart Study

    Kenneth J. Mukamal;Janne S. Tolstrup;Jens Friberg;Gorm Jensen

  • Drinking frequency, mediating biomarkers, and risk of myocardial infarction in women and men

    Kenneth J. Mukamal;Majken K. Jensen;Morten Grønbæk;Meir J. Stampfer

  • Perceived stress as a risk factor for changes in health behaviour and cardiac risk profile: a longitudinal study.

    Naja Hulvej Rod;M Grønbaek;P Schnohr;E Prescott

  • Intake of Beer, Wine, and Spirits and Risk of Stroke The Copenhagen City Heart Study

    Thomas Truelsen;Morten Grønbæk;Peter Schnohr;Gudrun Boysen

  • Alcoholic beverage preference, diet, and health habits in the UNC Alumni Heart Study.

    John C Barefoot;Morten Grønbæk;John R Feaganes;R Sue McPherson

  • Population based cohort study of the association between alcohol intake and cancer of the upper digestive tract

    Morten Grønbæk;Ulrik Becker;Ditte Johansen;Hanne Tønnesen

  • Alcohol drinking pattern and risk of alcoholic liver cirrhosis: A prospective cohort study

    Gro Askgaard;Gro Askgaard;Morten Grønbæk;Mette S. Kjær;Anne Tjønneland

  • Epidemiology of chronic pain in Denmark: an update.

    Per Sjøgren;Ola Ekholm;Vera Peuckmann;Morten Grønbaek

  • Influence of sex, age, body mass index, and smoking on alcohol intake and mortality

    M Gronbaek;A Deis;T I A Sorensen;U Becker

  • Alcohol Intake, Beverage Preference, and Risk of Hip Fracture in Men and Women

    Susanne Høidrup;Morten Grønbæk;Adam Gottschau;Jes Bruun Lauritzen

  • Perceived Stress and Cause-specific Mortality among Men and Women: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study

    Naja Rod Nielsen;Tage S. Kristensen;Peter Schnohr;Morten Grønbæk

  • Alcohol Consumption during Pregnancy and the Risk of Preterm Delivery

    Katrine Albertsen;Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen;Jørn Olsen;Morten Grønbaek

  • Moderate alcohol intake during pregnancy and risk of fetal death

    Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen;Per Kragh Andersen;Jørn Olsen;Morten Grønbæk

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Schnohr
Peter Schnohr University of Copenhagen
Thorkild I. A. Sørensen
Thorkild I. A. Sørensen University of Copenhagen
Anne Tjønneland
Anne Tjønneland University of Copenhagen
Gorm B. Jensen
Gorm B. Jensen Copenhagen University Hospital
Kim Overvad
Kim Overvad Aarhus University
Eva Prescott
Eva Prescott University of Copenhagen
Ola Ekholm
Ola Ekholm University of Southern Denmark
Jørn Olsen
Jørn Olsen Aarhus University
Christoffer Johansen
Christoffer Johansen Copenhagen University Hospital
Berit L. Heitmann
Berit L. Heitmann Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in a healthcare career but looking for alternative routes to a traditional MD degree, there are several flexible online programs worth considering. Online options, such as direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online, allow individuals from non-nursing backgrounds to fast-track to advanced nursing roles. These can be appealing for students who want a shorter and more flexible pathway into the field.

If you're seeking a more accessible admission process, direct admit nursing programs may offer less competitive entry requirements, making it easier to begin your nursing education.

Exploring supportive financial options is also important. Those interested in administrative healthcare roles can find financial aid for medical billing and coding programs, helping to reduce the cost of training for in-demand careers.

Additionally, some students prefer programs without extensive testing requirements. Several nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams allow applicants to bypass common entrance exams, streamlining the admissions process.

These alternatives can provide valuable opportunities for those seeking to enter healthcare professions quickly and affordably.

Best Scientists Citing Morten Grønbæk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles