World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
5461
World Ranking
8805
National Ranking
3725

William W. Sutherling publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William W. Sutherling sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 74 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

William W. Sutherling D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William W. Sutherling sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

William W. Sutherling is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their academic career is connected to this primary institution, which is known for research and education in diverse scientific fields.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues have been documented, indicating either limited publicly available recent publication data or a focus on work not captured in standard academic sources at this time.

Similarly, there are no recorded book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics listed for this scientist. This absence of detailed subject area information suggests the need for further access to comprehensive bibliographic or institutional records to outline their research specialties.

There are no awards or honors documented in the available data. This may reflect either an early stage of the career or a focus on contributions not recognized by formal accolades.

William W. Sutherling is currently living, and no further personal or career developments are noted.

Best Publications

  • Presurgical evaluation for partial epilepsy Relative contributions of chronic depth‐electrode recordings versus FDG‐PET and scalp‐sphenoidal ictal EEG

    J. Engel;T. R. Henry;M. W. Risinger;J. C. Mazziotta

  • Neuromagnetic localization of epileptiform spike activity in the human brain

    Daniel S. Barth;William Sutherling;Jerome Engel;Jackson Beatty

  • IFCN recommended standards for short latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Report of an IFCN committee

    Marc R. Nuwer;Michael Aminoff;John Desmedt;Andrew A. Eisen

  • Comparisons of MEG, EEG, and ECoG source localization in neocortical partial epilepsy in humans.

    Nobukazu Nakasatp;Michel F. Levesque;Daniel S. Barth;Christoph Baumgartner

  • Neuromagnetic Evidence of Spatially Distributed Sources Underlying Epileptiform Spikes in the Human Brain

    Daniel S. Barth;William Sutherling;Jerome Engle;Jackson Beatty

  • The magnetic and electric fields agree with intracranial localizations of somatosensory cortex.

    W. W. Sutherling;P. H. Crandall;T. M. Darcey;D. P. Becker

  • Quality of life of epilepsy surgery patients as compared with outpatients with hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and/or depressive symptoms.

    Barbara G. Vickrey;Ron D. Hays;Ron D. Hays;Rebecca Rausch;William W. Sutherling

  • Influence of magnetic source imaging for planning intracranial EEG in epilepsy

    Unknown

  • Magnetic localization of a dipolar current source implanted in a sphere and a human cranium.

    Daniel S. Barth;William Sutherling;Jill Broffman;Jackson Beatty

  • Neuromagnetic investigation of somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex.

    C. Baumgartner;A. Doppelbauer;L. Deecke;D. S. Barth

  • Interictal cerebral metabolism in partial epilepsies of neocortical origin

    T.R. Henry;W.W. Sutherling;J. Engel;M.W. Risinger

  • Surgical treatment of partial epilepsy arising from the insular cortex. Report of two cases.

    Steven N. Roper;Michel F. Levesque;William W. Sutherling;Jerome Engel

  • The magnetic field of epileptic spikes agrees with intracranial localizations in complex partial epilepsy.

    William W. Sutherling;Paul H. Crandall;Leslie D. Cahan;Daniel S. Barth

  • The magnetic field of complex partial seizures agrees with intracranial localizations

    William W. Sutherling;Paul H. Crandall;Jerome Engel;Terrance M. Darcey;Terrance M. Darcey

  • Single-unit responses selective for whole faces in the human amygdala.

    Ueli Rutishauser;Ueli Rutishauser;Oana Tudusciuc;Dirk Neumann;Adam N. Mamelak

  • Neocortical propagation in temporal lobe spike foci on magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography

    W. W. Sutherling;D. S. Barth

  • IFCN guidelines for topographic and frequency analysis of EEGs and EPs. Report of an IFCN committee

    Marc R. Nuwer;Dietrich Lehmann;Fernando Lopes da Silva;Shigeaki Matsuoka

  • Magnetoencephalography-directed surgery in patients with neocortical epilepsy

    Adam N Mamelak;Nancy Lopez;Massoud Akhtari;W William Sutherling

  • Cortical sensory representation of the human hand Size of finger regions and nonoverlapping digit somatotopy

    William W. Sutherling;Michel F. Levesque;Christoph Baumgartner

  • Magnetic source imaging localizes epileptogenic zone in children with tuberous sclerosis complex

    J. Y. Wu;W. W. Sutherling;S. Koh;N. Salamon

  • Review of the 20-year UCLA experience with surgery for epilepsy

    Leslie D. Cahan;William Sutherling;Mary Alyce McCullough;Rebecca Rausch

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel S. Barth
Daniel S. Barth University of Colorado Boulder
Christoph Baumgartner
Christoph Baumgartner Medical University of Vienna
Jerome Engel
Jerome Engel University of California, Los Angeles
Paul H. Crandall
Paul H. Crandall University of California, Los Angeles
Thomas R. Henry
Thomas R. Henry University of Minnesota
Rebecca Rausch
Rebecca Rausch University of California, Los Angeles
John C. Mazziotta
John C. Mazziotta University of California, Los Angeles
Marc R. Nuwer
Marc R. Nuwer University of California, Los Angeles
Robert H. Brook
Robert H. Brook RAND Corporation
Michael E. Phelps
Michael E. Phelps University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Neuroscience, there are several related online degrees and career paths to consider. Many students pursue advanced study in fields like counseling, psychology, or therapy, which let you work directly with individuals using your understanding of the brain and behavior.

For those interested in counseling, you may want to explore the best online cacrep counseling programs, which are accredited and designed to meet professional licensure requirements. If affordability is a top priority, finding the cheapest mental health counseling degree programs can open the door to a mental health career without a heavy financial burden.

Consider careers in therapy as well. Those drawn to supporting families and relationships might look into online mft programs accredited for quality education in marriage and family therapy. Additionally, a graduate degree can broaden your options—if you're asking how much does masters in psychology cost, many affordable online options are available.

Choosing the right online degree helps align your neuroscience background with a rewarding career in mental health, therapy, or research.

Best Scientists Citing William W. Sutherling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles