World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
7285
World Ranking
5611
National Ranking
2486

Daniel S. Barth publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Barth sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel S. Barth D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Barth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel S. Barth is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including social psychology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, cultural studies, and clinical psychology. Barth's work intersects with topics such as psychoanalysis and social critique, psychotherapy techniques and applications, psychology coaching and therapy, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, stress responses and cortisol, and epilepsy research and treatment.

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Effects of immunization with heat-killed Mycobacterium vaccae on autism spectrum disorder-like behavior and epileptogenesis in a rat model of comorbid autism and epilepsy (2020), published in Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • Sensitivity of unilateral- versus bilateral-onset spike-wave discharges to ethosuximide and carbamazepine in the fluid percussion injury rat model of traumatic brain injury (2021), published in Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Spike-wave discharges in Sprague-Dawley rats reflect precise intra- and interhemispheric synchronization of somatosensory cortex (2022), published in Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Besetzung, Neid und Eifersucht (2020), published in PSYCHE
  • Editorial (2021), published in Kinderanalyse

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Jeremy A. Taylor
  • Zachariah Z. Smith
  • Christopher A. Lowry
  • Rebecca A. Kubiak
  • Mathew R. Arnold

Barth's work appears regularly in several publication venues. The most frequent among these are:

  • Kinderanalyse
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Iggrot Ha Ari
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • PSYCHE

Best Publications

  • NeuroD-null mice are deaf due to a severe loss of the inner ear sensory neurons during development.

    Woo-Young Kim;Bernd Fritzsch;Amanda Serls;Leigh Anne Bakel

  • Neuromagnetic localization of epileptiform spike activity in the human brain

    Daniel S. Barth;William Sutherling;Jerome Engel;Jackson Beatty

  • Comparisons of MEG, EEG, and ECoG source localization in neocortical partial epilepsy in humans.

    Nobukazu Nakasatp;Michel F. Levesque;Daniel S. Barth;Christoph Baumgartner

  • Neuromagnetic Evidence of Spatially Distributed Sources Underlying Epileptiform Spikes in the Human Brain

    Daniel S. Barth;William Sutherling;Jerome Engle;Jackson Beatty

  • The magnetic and electric fields agree with intracranial localizations of somatosensory cortex.

    W. W. Sutherling;P. H. Crandall;T. M. Darcey;D. P. Becker

  • Intracellular Correlates of Fast (>200 Hz) Electrical Oscillations in Rat Somatosensory Cortex

    Michael S. Jones;Kurt D. MacDonald;ByungJu Choi;F. Edward Dudek

  • Auditory, Somatosensory, and Multisensory Insular Cortex in the Rat

    Krista M. Rodgers;Alexander M. Benison;Andrea Klein;Daniel S. Barth

  • The cortical innate immune response increases local neuronal excitability leading to seizures

    Krista M. Rodgers;Mark R. Hutchinson;Mark R. Hutchinson;Alexis Northcutt;Steven F. Maier

  • Thalamic modulation of high-frequency oscillating potentials in auditory cortex

    Daniel S. Barth;Kurt D. MacDonald

  • The spatiotemporal organization of auditory, visual, and auditory-visual evoked potentials in rat cortex

    Daniel S. Barth;Niel Goldberg;Barbara Brett;Shi Di

  • Magnetic localization of a dipolar current source implanted in a sphere and a human cranium.

    Daniel S. Barth;William Sutherling;Jill Broffman;Jackson Beatty

  • Laminar analysis of extracellular field potentials in rat vibrissa/barrel cortex.

    Shi Di;C. Baumgartner;D. S. Barth

  • Neuromagnetic investigation of somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex.

    C. Baumgartner;A. Doppelbauer;L. Deecke;D. S. Barth

  • Spatiotemporal Organization of Fast (>200 Hz) Electrical Oscillations in Rat Vibrissa/Barrel Cortex

    Michael S. Jones;Daniel S. Barth

  • Three-dimensional analysis of auditory-evoked potentials in rat neocortex.

    D. S. Barth;Shi Di

  • The magnetic field of epileptic spikes agrees with intracranial localizations in complex partial epilepsy.

    William W. Sutherling;Paul H. Crandall;Leslie D. Cahan;Daniel S. Barth

  • The magnetic field of complex partial seizures agrees with intracranial localizations

    William W. Sutherling;Paul H. Crandall;Jerome Engel;Terrance M. Darcey;Terrance M. Darcey

  • Neocortical propagation in temporal lobe spike foci on magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography

    W. W. Sutherling;D. S. Barth

  • A multisensory zone in rat parietotemporal cortex: intra- and extracellular physiology and thalamocortical connections.

    Barbara Brett-Green;Eva Fifková;David T. Larue;Jeffery A. Winer

  • Safety signals mitigate the consequences of uncontrollable stress via a circuit involving the sensory insular cortex and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis

    John P. Christianson;Joshua H. Jennings;Thomas Ragole;Johana G.N. Flyer

  • Submillisecond Synchronization of Fast Electrical Oscillations in Neocortex

    Daniel S. Barth

Frequent Co-Authors

William W. Sutherling
William W. Sutherling University of California, Los Angeles
Christoph Baumgartner
Christoph Baumgartner Medical University of Vienna
F. Edward Dudek
F. Edward Dudek University of Utah
Linda R. Watkins
Linda R. Watkins University of Colorado Boulder
Richard J. Staba
Richard J. Staba University of California, Los Angeles
Paul H. Crandall
Paul H. Crandall University of California, Los Angeles
Steven F. Maier
Steven F. Maier University of Colorado Boulder
Mark R. Hutchinson
Mark R. Hutchinson University of Adelaide
Jerome Engel
Jerome Engel University of California, Los Angeles
Jerry W. Rudy
Jerry W. Rudy University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel S. Barth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles