World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gunther Seckmeyer

Gunther Seckmeyer

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
6814
World Ranking
5628
National Ranking
379

Gunther Seckmeyer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunther Seckmeyer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 139 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Gunther Seckmeyer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gunther Seckmeyer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gunther Seckmeyer is affiliated with the University of Hannover in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their research spans multiple subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Aerospace Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Environmental Engineering.

Their work addresses various key topics such as Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Calibration and Measurement Techniques, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics, and Cryospheric studies and observations.

Seckmeyer has published research in several scientific venues. Frequent publication forums include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Measurement Science and Technology
  • Energies
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Nature Communications

Their recent papers cover a range of environmental and atmospheric topics. Notable publications are:

  • "Overview of the PALM model system 6.0" (2020) in Geoscientific model development
  • "Black carbon footprint of human presence in Antarctica" (2022) in Nature Communications
  • "Persistent extreme ultraviolet irradiance in Antarctica despite the ozone recovery onset" (2022) in Scientific Reports
  • "Warming events projected to become more frequent and last longer across Antarctica" (2021) in Scientific Reports
  • "Black carbon in the Southern Andean snowpack" (2022) in Environmental Research Letters

Collaborations have been a significant aspect of Seckmeyer's work. Frequent co-authors include Raúl R. Cordero, Sarah Féron, Alessandro Damiani, Edgardo Sepúlveda, and José Jorquera.

Best Publications

  • Overview of the PALM model system 6.0

    Björn Maronga;Björn Maronga;Sabine Banzhaf;Cornelia Burmeister;Thomas Esch

  • The Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC): history, status and perspectives

    Martine De Mazière;Anne M. Thompson;Michael J. Kurylo;Jeannette D. Wild

  • Systematic long‐term comparison of spectral UV measurements and UVSPEC modeling results

    B. Mayer;G. Seckmeyer;A. Kylling

  • Uncertainty of measurements of spectral solar UV irradiance

    G. Bernhard;G. Seckmeyer

  • Comparison of Models Used for UV Index Calculations

    Peter Koepke;Alkiviadis Bais;Dimitrios Balis;Michael Buchwitz

  • Increased ultraviolet radiation in New Zealand (45°S) relative to Germany (48°N)

    G. Seckmeyer;R. L. McKenzie;R. L. McKenzie

  • Transmittance of a cloud is wavelength‐dependent in the UV‐range

    G. Seckmeyer;R. Erb;A. Albold

  • Enhanced absorption of UV radiation due to multiple scattering in clouds: Experimental evidence and theoretical explanation

    Bernhard Mayer;A. Kylling;Sasha Madronich;G. Seckmeyer

  • Satellite retrievals of erythemal UV dose compared with ground‐based measurements at northern and southern midlatitudes

    R. L. McKenzie;G. Seckmeyer;A. F. Bais;J. B. Kerr

  • Transmittance of a cloud is wavelength‐dependent in the UV‐range: Physical interpretation

    A. Kylling;A. Albold;G. Seckmeyer

  • Variability of UV Irradiance in Europe

    Gunther Seckmeyer;Darius Pissulla;Merle Glandorf;Diamantino Henriques

  • Measurements of spectral solar UV irradiance in tropical‐Australia

    G. Bernhard;B. Mayer;G. Seckmeyer;A. Moise

  • SUSPEN intercomparison of ultraviolet spectroradiometers

    A F Bais;B G Gardiner;H Slaper;M Blumthaler

  • Geographical differences in the UV measured by intercompared spectroradiometers

    G. Seckmeyer;B. Mayer;G. Bernhard;R. L. McKenzie

  • UV‐B in Germany higher in 1993 than in 1992

    G. Seckmeyer;B. Mayer;R. Erb;G. Bernhard

  • Traveling reference spectroradiometer for routine quality assurance of spectral solar ultraviolet irradiance measurements

    Julian Gröbner;Josef Schreder;Stelios Kazadzis;Alkiviadis F. Bais

  • Variability of UV-B at four stations in Europe

    C. S. Zerefos;D. S. Balis;A. F. Bais;D. Gillotay

  • Simultaneous spectroradiometry: A study of solar UV irradiance at two altitudes

    M. Blumthaler;A. R. Webb;G. Seckmeyer;A. F. Bais

  • Cosine error correction of spectral UV-irradiances

    Gunther Seckmeyer;Germar Bernhard

  • Biological dosimetry of solar radiation for different simulated ozone column thicknesses.

    G. Horneck;P. Rettberg;E. Rabbow;W. Strauch

Frequent Co-Authors

Mario Blumthaler
Mario Blumthaler Innsbruck Medical University
Alkiviadis F. Bais
Alkiviadis F. Bais Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Richard McKenzie
Richard McKenzie National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Bernhard Mayer
Bernhard Mayer University of Calgary
Andreas Matzarakis
Andreas Matzarakis University of Freiburg
Renate Forkel
Renate Forkel Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Matthias Mauder
Matthias Mauder Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Stelios Kazadzis
Stelios Kazadzis Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos, World Radiation Center
Siegfried Raasch
Siegfried Raasch University of Hannover
Gabriele Pfister
Gabriele Pfister National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences can open doors to various interdisciplinary fields. For students interested in understanding human behavior and its impact on the environment, exploring accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide valuable insights. This foundation complements environmental studies by addressing social dynamics and policy implications.

For educators and professionals aiming to advance their qualifications, online education offers flexible options like edd no dissertation programs. These degrees emphasize practical leadership skills without the traditional dissertation, ideal for those balancing career and study.

Transitioning from a master's to a doctoral level is also attainable through accredited eds to edd programs, which streamline the pathway for education professionals seeking advanced expertise. These programs are often designed with working adults in mind, offering a blend of theoretical and applied learning.

Additionally, individuals passionate about social work and environmental advocacy might pursue fully funded dsw programs. These doctorate programs provide opportunities to influence policy and community health while minimizing financial barriers.

Best Scientists Citing Gunther Seckmeyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles