World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark R. Hutchinson

Mark R. Hutchinson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 63 3380 3092 89 82 227 15435

Mark R. Hutchinson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark R. Hutchinson between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark R. Hutchinson published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2025. 42 of the 302 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2025. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 27 publications
2002 2025

302 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark R. Hutchinson: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 0
2007 7
2008 9
2009 11
2010 12
2011 17
2012 18
2013 11
2014 20
2015 14
2016 25
2017 11
2018 17
2019 18
2020 21
2021 18
2022 8
2023 15
2024 15
2025 27
Total 302
Download as CSV

Mark R. Hutchinson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Hutchinson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 218–227 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 227 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242 227
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark R. Hutchinson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Hutchinson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260 63
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark R. Hutchinson is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia and focuses primarily on medical research. Their work covers numerous facets within the medical field, with significant contributions to physiology, molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, immunology, and pharmacology.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

The frequent publication venues for their research encompass:

  • IEEE Photonics Technology Letters
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Pain

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hutchinson include:

  • Dawn Melley
  • Kevin Lisankie
  • Jeffrey Cichocki
  • Kathleen Kramer
  • Thomas Siegert

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Hutchinson are:

  • "A Chat(GPT) about the future of scientific publishing," 2023, Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • "Small-Molecule Modulators of Toll-like Receptors," 2020, Accounts of Chemical Research
  • "The Neuroimmunology of Chronic Pain: From Rodents to Humans," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Gender inequality in publishing during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • "TLR4 biased small molecule modulators," 2021, Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Best Publications

  • Pathological pain and the neuroimmune interface

    Peter M. Grace;Mark R. Hutchinson;Steven F. Maier;Linda R. Watkins

  • Evidence that opioids may have toll-like receptor 4 and MD-2 effects

    Mark R. Hutchinson;Yingning Zhang;Mitesh Shridhar;John H. Evans

  • Morphine activates neuroinflammation in a manner parallel to endotoxin

    Xiaohui Wang;Lisa C. Loram;Khara Ramos;Armando J. de Jesus

  • Non-stereoselective reversal of neuropathic pain by naloxone and naltrexone: involvement of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)

    Mark R. Hutchinson;Yingning Zhang;Kimberley Brown;Benjamen D. Coats

  • Exploring the Neuroimmunopharmacology of Opioids: An Integrative Review of Mechanisms of Central Immune Signaling and Their Implications for Opioid Analgesia

    Mark R. Hutchinson;Yehuda Shavit;Peter M. Grace;Kenner C. Rice

  • Opioid-induced glial activation: mechanisms of activation and implications for opioid analgesia, dependence, and reward.

    Mark R. Hutchinson;Sondra T. Bland;Kirk W. Johnson;Kenner C. Rice

  • The “Toll” of Opioid-Induced Glial Activation: Improving the Clinical Efficacy of Opioids by Targeting Glia

    Linda R. Watkins;Mark R. Hutchinson;Mark R. Hutchinson;Kenner C. Rice;Steven F. Maier

  • Glia as the “bad guys”: Implications for improving clinical pain control and the clinical utility of opioids

    Linda R. Watkins;Mark R. Hutchinson;Annemarie Ledeboer;Julie Wieseler-Frank

  • Toll-like receptor 4 in CNS pathologies

    Madison M. Buchanan;Mark Hutchinson;Linda R. Watkins;Hang Yin

  • Glia: novel counter-regulators of opioid analgesia

    Linda R. Watkins;Mark R. Hutchinson;Ian N. Johnston;Steven F. Maier

  • Proinflammatory cytokines oppose opioid-induced acute and chronic analgesia

    Mark R. Hutchinson;Benjamen D. Coats;Susannah S. Lewis;Yingning Zhang

  • Toll-like receptors in chronic pain.

    Lauren Nicotra;Lisa C Loram;Linda R Watkins;Mark R Hutchinson

  • Opioid Activation of Toll-Like Receptor 4 Contributes to Drug Reinforcement

    M. R. Hutchinson;A. L. Northcutt;T. Hiranita;X. Wang

  • Reduction of opioid withdrawal and potentiation of acute opioid analgesia by systemic AV411 (ibudilast).

    Mark R. Hutchinson;Susannah S. Lewis;Benjamen D. Coats;David A. Skyba

  • DAT isn't all that: cocaine reward and reinforcement require Toll-like receptor 4 signaling.

    A L Northcutt;M R Hutchinson;X Wang;M V Baratta

  • “Listening” and “talking” to neurons: Implications of immune activation for pain control and increasing the efficacy of opioids

    Linda R. Watkins;Mark R. Hutchinson;Erin D. Milligan;Steven F. Maier

  • Evidence that intrathecal morphine-3-glucuronide may cause pain enhancement via toll-like receptor 4/MD-2 and interleukin-1β

    Susannah S. Lewis;Mark R. Hutchinson;Mark R. Hutchinson;Niloofar Rezvani;Lisa C. Loram

  • Early-Life Experience Decreases Drug-Induced Reinstatement of Morphine CPP in Adulthood via Microglial-Specific Epigenetic Programming of Anti-Inflammatory IL-10 Expression

    Jaclyn M Schwarz;Mark R Hutchinson;Staci D Bilbo

  • Minocycline suppresses morphine-induced respiratory depression, suppresses morphine-induced reward, and enhances systemic morphine-induced analgesia.

    Mark R. Hutchinson;Alexis L. Northcutt;Lindsey W. Chao;Jeffrey J. Kearney

  • Small-Molecule Modulators of Toll-like Receptors

    Yibo Wang;Shuting Zhang;Hongyuan Li;Hongshuang Wang

  • Implications of central immune signaling caused by drugs of abuse: Mechanisms, mediators and new therapeutic approaches for prediction and treatment of drug dependence

    Janet K. Coller;Mark R. Hutchinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda R. Watkins
Linda R. Watkins University of Colorado Boulder
Kenner C. Rice
Kenner C. Rice National Institutes of Health
Steven F. Maier
Steven F. Maier University of Colorado Boulder
Andrew A. Somogyi
Andrew A. Somogyi University of Adelaide
Guozhen Liu
Guozhen Liu University of New South Wales
Hang Yin
Hang Yin Tsinghua University
Sarah A. Robertson
Sarah A. Robertson University of Adelaide
John D. Hayball
John D. Hayball University of South Australia
Heike Ebendorff-Heidepriem
Heike Ebendorff-Heidepriem University of Adelaide
Sondra T. Bland
Sondra T. Bland University of Colorado Denver

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in neuroscience can open doors to diverse and rewarding careers. Many students wonder about the earning potential and which college majors that make the most money. Neuroscience is often ranked highly due to opportunities in healthcare, research, and emerging tech fields.

If you’re looking for flexible study options, there are online colleges that offer financial aid to help manage costs. These institutions make it possible to earn a respected degree without breaking the bank.

Not ready for a full degree? Consider online certification courses that focus on neuroscience or related subjects. These programs can boost your qualifications and lead to well-paying jobs in less time.

For those seeking a less intensive academic journey, some paths are considered an easy university experience while still offering valuable skills in related scientific fields. Ultimately, online education has made it easier than ever to chart your own neuroscience career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Mark R. Hutchinson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles