World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
7362
World Ranking
8833
National Ranking
3772

Chee Yap publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chee Yap sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 199 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Chee Yap D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chee Yap sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chee Yap is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research spans fields including Computer Science and Engineering, with significant contributions in several subfields such as Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The main topics covered in Chee Yap's work include:

  • Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
  • Polynomial and algebraic computation
  • Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
  • Numerical Methods and Algorithms
  • Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis

Chee Yap has authored publications in a variety of venues, with frequent publications in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Symbolic Computation
  • Computational Geometry
  • Applied Mathematics and Computation

The following papers by Chee Yap illustrate the diversity of their contributions:

  • Resolution-Exact Planner for Thick Non-Crossing 2-Link Robots, 2020, Springer proceedings in advanced robotics
  • An algorithmic approach to small limit cycles of nonlinear differential systems: The averaging method revisited, 2020, Journal of Symbolic Computation
  • Soft subdivision motion planning for complex planar robots, 2020, Computational Geometry
  • Robust parameter estimation for rational ordinary differential equations, 2025, Applied Mathematics and Computation
  • Certified Approximation Algorithms for the Fermat Point and n-Ellipses, 2021, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Hoon Hong
  • Alexey Ovchinnikov
  • Yi-Jen Chiang
  • Soo Jung Go
  • Ilia Ilmer

Best Publications

  • Parallel Computational Geometry

    Alok Aggarwal;Bernard Chazelle;Leo Guibas;Colm O'Dunlaing

  • AnO(n logn) algorithm for the voronoi diagram of a set of simple curve segments

    Chee K. Yap

  • A “retraction” method for planning the motion of a disc

    Unknown

  • Algorithmic motion planning

    Chee Yap

  • Classroom examples of robustness problems in geometric computations

    Lutz Kettner;Kurt Mehlhorn;Sylvain Pion;Stefan Schirra

  • Some consequences of non-uniform conditions on uniform classes

    Unknown

  • Retraction: A new approach to motion-planning

    Colm ó'Dúnlaing;Micha Sharir;Chee K. Yap

  • The exact computation paradigm

    Chee Yap;T Dube

  • Robust geometric computation

    Chee K. Yap

  • The Format Model: A Theory of database Organization

    Richard Hull;Chee K. Yap

  • On k-hulls and related problems

    Richard Cole;Micha Sharir;Chee K. Yap

  • On k -hulls and related problems

    Richard Cole;Micha Sharir;Chee K Yap

  • Shape From Probing

    Richard Cole;Chee K. Yap

  • A core library for robust numeric and geometric computation

    V. Karamcheti;C. Li;I. Pechtchanski;C. Yap

  • Dynamic Map Labeling

    K. Been;E. Daiches;C. Yap

  • Complete subdivision algorithms, II: Isotopic meshing of singular algebraic curves

    Michael Burr;Sung Woo Choi;Ben Galehouse;Chee K. Yap

  • Almost tight recursion tree bounds for the Descartes method

    Arno Eigenwillig;Vikram Sharma;Chee K. Yap

  • Global Identifiability of Differential Models

    Hoon Hong;Alexey Ovchinnikov;Alexey Ovchinnikov;Gleb Pogudin;Gleb Pogudin;Chee Yap

  • SIAN: software for structural identifiability analysis of ODE models.

    Hoon Hong;Alexey Ovchinnikov;Gleb Pogudin;Chee Yap

  • Computational complexity of combinatorial surfaces

    Gert Vegter;Chee K. Yap

  • Probing convex polytopes

    D. Dobkin;H. Edelsbrunner;C. K. Yap

  • Strong np-hardness of moving many discs

    Paul G. Spirakis;Chee-Keng Yap

  • Amortized Bound for Root Isolation via Sturm Sequences

    Zilin Du;Vikram Sharma;Chee K. Yap

  • Classroom Examples of Robustness Problems in Geometric Computations

    Lutz Kettner;Kurt Mehlhorn;Sylvain Pion;Stefan Schirra

Frequent Co-Authors

Gert Vegter
Gert Vegter University of Groningen
Kurt Mehlhorn
Kurt Mehlhorn Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Richard Cole
Richard Cole New York University
David G. Kirkpatrick
David G. Kirkpatrick University of British Columbia
Micha Sharir
Micha Sharir Tel Aviv University
Victor Y. Pan
Victor Y. Pan City University of New York
Bernard Chazelle
Bernard Chazelle Princeton University
David P. Dobkin
David P. Dobkin Princeton University
Leonidas J. Guibas
Leonidas J. Guibas Stanford University
Herbert Edelsbrunner
Herbert Edelsbrunner Institute of Science and Technology Austria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens many flexible online learning and career opportunities. If your goal is to quickly enter the tech workforce, consider easy licenses and certifications to get. These programs require less time than traditional degrees and offer pathways to well-paying roles such as IT support or cybersecurity technician.

For those seeking to accelerate their academic journey, several universities offer the quickest masters degree online options. Finishing your master’s in a short time helps you enter in-demand fields like data science or software engineering sooner.

When selecting a graduate program, prioritize specializations considered the most worthwhile masters degrees. Degrees in Artificial Intelligence, Analytics, and Cybersecurity are especially valued by employers.

If you’re beginning your educational journey, an associate's degree online offers a strong foundation in computer science. These affordable programs can lead to entry-level jobs or count toward a bachelor’s degree later on.

Best Scientists Citing Chee Yap

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles